blob: 52f13ba9b570f6cbaf536860dfaceba8565ed438 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this QEMU performance issue is related to user-mode or system-mode. The problem described is about running CoreMark on different versions of QEMU, specifically when using the x86_64 target on an aarch64 host. The scores show a significant drop starting from version 3 onwards.
First, I know that QEMU has two main modes: user-mode and system-mode. User-mode emulation is used for running individual applications, while system-mode is for emulating entire systems, including the OS and hardware devices.
The issue here mentions using CoreMark with different QEMU versions in a guest x86-64 to host arm64 setup. Since CoreMark is a benchmarking tool that typically runs as an application, it's likely being run in user-mode because it doesn't require emulating the entire OS stack.
Looking at the performance degradation starting from version 3, I recall that QEMU made some changes around this time. There were optimizations and architectural changes aimed at improving performance, but sometimes these can have unintended consequences. Maybe something changed in how the x86_64 instruction set is handled on aarch64 hosts.
I should check if there were any major changes in QEMU version 3 related to user-mode emulation for x86_64 targets. Perhaps there was an introduction of new translation layers or just-in-time compilation features that affected performance negatively on certain architectures. Or maybe some optimizations were added that didn't play well with the aarch64 host, leading to slower execution.
Another angle is considering whether this is specific to user-mode tools versus system-mode. If it's user-mode, then it's about how individual applications are translated and executed. System-mode issues would involve more components like device emulation or kernel interaction, which doesn't seem to be the case here since CoreMark is a single application.
I also think about whether the performance drop could be due to specific features enabled in newer QEMU versions that add overhead. For example, if certain security features or debugging tools were introduced without considering performance impact on user-mode tasks.
In conclusion, since the problem revolves around running an application benchmark and shows significant changes starting at a version where major updates occurred, it's likely related to user-mode emulation.
</think>
user
|