blob: 95ef5109f3c7f173ddff2c3d0b2519315aa8dd32 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to classify this bug report as either 'user-mode' or 'system-mode'. Let me try to understand what's going on here.
The problem is about the Sparc `fdtox` and `fqtox` instructions incorrectly selecting the destination register when it's higher than f31. The user provided a test program that uses inline assembly with these instructions. They compile it using a cross-compiler for Sparc64, run it in QEMU, and expect to print 60 but instead get 0.
The issue seems to be related to how the destination registers are handled by the assembler or emulator. The bug report mentions a specific commit in QEMU (0bba7572d4) that changed how destination registers are selected. So this is likely an issue with how QEMU's user-mode emulation handles these instructions.
User-mode typically refers to emulating the execution of applications, dealing with system calls and application-level code. Since the problem occurs in a test program running on top of QEMU without needing specific hardware or kernel interaction beyond what's normal for running such programs, it seems like this is a user-mode issue.
System-mode issues usually involve lower-level things like device drivers, hardware access, or the operating system's interaction with hardware. This doesn't seem to be the case here since the problem is about an application program using specific Sparc instructions and how they're being handled by the emulator in its user-mode environment.
So putting it all together, this bug is related to QEMU's handling of user-space applications and their use of certain Sparc floating-point instructions. Therefore, it should be classified as 'user'.
</think>
The issue pertains to how QEMU emulates application-level code execution using specific Sparc instructions without involving system-level components.
**Answer:** user
|