blob: efb289f474f3063eafdf781e01f1c1db7b606819 (
plain) (
blame)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
|
<think>
Okay, so I'm trying to figure out whether this bug in QEMU is related to user-mode or system-mode. Let's break down the problem step by step.
First, the issue described involves the `chown()` function failing when it should succeed. The test case provided uses a C program that attempts to change ownership of files and symbolic links. When run natively on a Linux/sparc64 machine, it works fine (returns 0). But when run under QEMU user mode emulation, it fails with "Operation not permitted" and returns 1.
I need to recall what distinguishes user-mode from system-mode in QEMU. User-mode emulation allows running binaries for different architectures without full virtualization. It translates syscalls from the guest architecture to the host's syscalls. This is useful for cross-compiling and testing software on different architectures without a full VM setup.
In this case, the problem occurs when using `QEMU_LD_PREFIX` and executing the binary with `qemu-sparc64`. So it's definitely related to user-mode because that's what QEMU does when you use the emulator directly like that. System-mode would involve running a full virtualized OS, which isn't mentioned here.
The error is about `chown()`, which is a system call. The fact that it works in native execution but not under QEMU suggests an issue with how QEMU handles this particular syscall or perhaps some related permission handling. Since user-mode deals with translating syscalls and managing processes, any issues in that layer could cause such problems.
Another point is the setup steps where they create a cross-compilation environment using `apt install` and set up the necessary directories for QEMU's user-mode emulation. This further indicates it's about running the program in an emulated user environment rather than a full system VM.
So putting it all together, the problem seems to be within how QEMU translates or handles certain syscalls in its user-mode emulation. Therefore, this is a user-mode related issue.
</think>
user
|