1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
|
<think>
Okay, so I need to figure out whether this QEMU bug is a user-mode issue or a system-mode issue. Let's start by understanding the problem.
The user is reporting that when they run their clone.c program under QEMU, it fails with an error of -1 from the clone syscall. But when they run the same executable natively, it works fine. They've tested this across different compilers (gcc, zig cc, clang) and even tried cross-compiling to riscv64, but the issue persists only in QEMU.
Looking at the code, the program uses the clone system call directly with syscall(SYS_clone, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0). The clone function is used for creating a new process, which should return the child's PID to the parent and 0 to the child. If it fails, it returns -1.
In QEMU, this is failing, but not outside of it. That suggests something about how QEMU handles system calls or processes might be different.
QEMU has two main modes: user mode emulation and system mode emulation. In user mode (like qemu-x86_64), it runs unprivileged applications without a full OS. It translates system calls from the emulated architecture to the host's system calls. In system mode, it emulates an entire system with hardware devices, etc.
In this case, the problem occurs when running under qemu-x86_64, which is user-mode emulation. So QEMU is trying to handle the clone syscall in some way. If the clone syscall isn't properly handled by QEMU's user-mode code, it could return an error like -1 even though the native system handles it correctly.
The referenced bug (https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1926996) seems to be about clone failing in user mode. So this is likely a known issue related to how QEMU's user-mode emulation handles certain syscalls, specifically clone in this case.
Since the issue occurs in user-mode and relates to handling a system call that creates a new process, it's a problem with how QEMU translates or executes these syscalls in the user space environment. Therefore, this is a 'user' mode related bug.
</think>
The bug is classified as a 'user' mode issue because it pertains to how QEMU handles system calls within its user-mode emulation.
user
|