1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
|
<think>
Okay, let's see. The user is talking about SIMD instructions in QEMU. They mention that when running a guest (like using NEON, MMX, SSE, etc.), these SIMD instructions are being translated to scalar instructions on the host instead of using the host's SIMD. That sounds like a performance issue because scalar instructions are slower for these operations.
Looking at the possible categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. The problem here isn't about a faulty instruction per se. It's more about how the instructions are being translated during execution. The user is pointing out that instead of translating to the equivalent SIMD instructions on the host, it's using scalar ones. So it's an issue with the translation process, which would fall under runtime errors or maybe instruction translation. But the categories given are instruction, syscall, runtime.
The "instruction" category is for a faulty instruction being described. The problem here isn't that an instruction is wrong, but that the translation process isn't optimizing it properly. So maybe it's a runtime error? Or perhaps it's an instruction translation issue. Wait, the categories don't have a specific one for translation. The "instruction" category might be about incorrect instructions being generated, but in this case, the instructions are being translated to scalar instead of SIMD, which is a performance problem but not necessarily a correctness issue. However, the user is reporting that SIMD is not being used, which could be a runtime issue. Hmm.
The problem is that the translation from guest SIMD to host SIMD isn't happening, leading to scalar instructions. Since it's about how instructions are handled during execution, perhaps it's an "instruction" category issue if the translation is incorrect. But the user isn't saying the instructions are wrong, just that they're not optimized. Wait, the categories are a bit ambiguous. The "runtime" category is for other errors happening at runtime. But maybe the instruction translation is part of the instruction handling. The original problem is that the translation is not using SIMD, which is part of the instruction execution path. So maybe it's an "instruction" category because it's about how the instructions are translated. Alternatively, if the translation is a runtime process, maybe "runtime".
Looking at the example categories: "instruction" is for a faulty instruction described. If the issue is that the translation is generating scalar instead of SIMD instructions, that's part of the instruction translation, so maybe "instruction". But I'm not entirely sure. However, since the problem is about the translation of instructions and not a system call or a runtime error like a crash, maybe "instruction" is the best fit here. The user is pointing out that the instructions are not being translated correctly (from SIMD to SIMD), leading to performance issues. So the category would be "instruction".
</think>
instruction
|