1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
|
<think>
Okay, let's see. The user is having issues with 9p mounts in a Docker VM setup using Lima and QEMU. The problem manifests as "Timer expired" errors when listing directories, and under strace, the getdents64 system call is failing with ETIME. When using a different protocol (9p2000.L), they get "Network dropped connection on reset" errors related to lgetxattr.
The question is to classify this bug report into one of the categories: instruction, syscall, or runtime. The user mentioned that Lima suggested it might be a QEMU issue.
First, "instruction" refers to a faulty instruction in the code, like incorrect assembly or machine instructions. That doesn't seem to fit here. The problem is about system calls failing with specific errors during operation.
The errors here are happening during system calls (getdents64 and lgetxattr) which are part of the interaction between the user space and the kernel. However, the classification options are syscall for errors with a syscall. But wait, the syscall category is for errors with the syscall itself, perhaps like incorrect parameters or implementation. Alternatively, runtime errors are other issues during execution.
But the problem here is that the system calls are returning errors (ETIME and ENETRESET) due to the underlying 9p implementation in QEMU. The user is experiencing runtime issues where the syscalls fail because of how QEMU handles the 9p protocol. The errors are not due to incorrect use of syscalls from the application (like ls) but rather the QEMU's 9p implementation not handling the requests properly, leading to timeouts or connection resets.
Since the problem is related to how QEMU processes the 9p protocol during runtime, leading to these syscall errors, the root cause is likely in QEMU's handling. However, according to the classification options, if the error is directly related to a syscall failing because of a bug in the syscall's implementation (like in the kernel or QEMU's emulation), does that count as a syscall category bug? Or is it a runtime error?
The syscall category is for an error with a syscall. Since the syscall (getdents64, lgetxattr) is failing due to the underlying 9p implementation in QEMU (which is part of the system call handling), this might be considered a syscall issue. However, if the problem is that during runtime the QEMU's 9p server is not responding correctly, leading to these errors, maybe it's a runtime error.
But the error messages are generated by the system calls themselves. The user is getting ETIME from getdents64, which is a syscall error. If the QEMU's 9p implementation is causing the syscall to time out, that would be a problem with the syscall's handling. So perhaps it's a syscall category issue. However, runtime errors could be other runtime problems. The description says "syscall: An error with a syscall". Since the problem is directly related to syscalls failing with specific errors, and the root cause is in how QEMU handles the 9p protocol during these syscalls, the category would be syscall.
</think>
syscall
|