qcow2: Make qcow2_alloc_bytes() more explicit

In case of -EAGAIN returned by update_refcount(), we should discard the
cluster offset we were trying to allocate and request a new one, because
in theory that old offset might now be taken by a refcount block.

In practice, this was not the case due to update_refcount() generally
returning strictly monotonic increasing cluster offsets. However, this
behavior is not set in stone, and it is also not obvious when looking at
qcow2_alloc_bytes() alone, so we should not rely on it.

Reported-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 6 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/block/qcow2-refcount.c b/block/qcow2-refcount.c
index a49d59e71e..2110839da4 100644
--- a/block/qcow2-refcount.c
+++ b/block/qcow2-refcount.c
@@ -949,11 +949,17 @@ int64_t qcow2_alloc_bytes(BlockDriverState *bs, int size)
 
             if (!offset || ROUND_UP(offset, s->cluster_size) != new_cluster) {
                 offset = new_cluster;
+                free_in_cluster = s->cluster_size;
+            } else {
+                free_in_cluster += s->cluster_size;
             }
         }
 
         assert(offset);
         ret = update_refcount(bs, offset, size, 1, false, QCOW2_DISCARD_NEVER);
+        if (ret < 0) {
+            offset = 0;
+        }
     } while (ret == -EAGAIN);
     if (ret < 0) {
         return ret;