xen/mapcache: store dma information in revmapcache entries for debugging

The Xen mapcache is able to create long term mappings, they are called
"locked" mappings. The third parameter of the xen_map_cache call
specifies if a mapping is a "locked" mapping.

>From the QEMU point of view there are two kinds of long term mappings:

[a] device memory mappings, such as option roms and video memory
[b] dma mappings, created by dma_memory_map & friends

After certain operations, ballooning a VM in particular, Xen asks QEMU
kindly to destroy all mappings. However, certainly [a] mappings are
present and cannot be removed. That's not a problem as they are not
affected by balloonning. The *real* problem is that if there are any
mappings of type [b], any outstanding dma operations could fail. This is
a known shortcoming. In other words, when Xen asks QEMU to destroy all
mappings, it is an error if any [b] mappings exist.

However today we have no way of distinguishing [a] from [b]. Because of
that, we cannot even print a decent warning.

This patch introduces a new "dma" bool field to MapCacheRev entires, to
remember if a given mapping is for dma or is a long term device memory
mapping. When xen_invalidate_map_cache is called, we print a warning if
any [b] mappings exist. We ignore [a] mappings.

Mappings created by qemu_map_ram_ptr are assumed to be [a], while
mappings created by address_space_map->qemu_ram_ptr_length are assumed
to be [b].

The goal of the patch is to make debugging and system understanding
easier.

Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Anthony PERARD <anthony.perard@citrix.com>

1 files changed, 10 insertions, 5 deletions

diff --git a/hw/i386/xen/xen-mapcache.c b/hw/i386/xen/xen-mapcache.c
index 31debdfb2c..e60156c04f 100644
--- a/hw/i386/xen/xen-mapcache.c
+++ b/hw/i386/xen/xen-mapcache.c
@@ -62,6 +62,7 @@ typedef struct MapCacheRev {
     hwaddr paddr_index;
     hwaddr size;
     QTAILQ_ENTRY(MapCacheRev) next;
+    bool dma;
 } MapCacheRev;
 
 typedef struct MapCache {
@@ -202,7 +203,7 @@ static void xen_remap_bucket(MapCacheEntry *entry,
 }
 
 static uint8_t *xen_map_cache_unlocked(hwaddr phys_addr, hwaddr size,
-                                       uint8_t lock)
+                                       uint8_t lock, bool dma)
 {
     MapCacheEntry *entry, *pentry = NULL;
     hwaddr address_index;
@@ -289,6 +290,7 @@ tryagain:
     if (lock) {
         MapCacheRev *reventry = g_malloc0(sizeof(MapCacheRev));
         entry->lock++;
+        reventry->dma = dma;
         reventry->vaddr_req = mapcache->last_entry->vaddr_base + address_offset;
         reventry->paddr_index = mapcache->last_entry->paddr_index;
         reventry->size = entry->size;
@@ -300,12 +302,12 @@ tryagain:
 }
 
 uint8_t *xen_map_cache(hwaddr phys_addr, hwaddr size,
-                       uint8_t lock)
+                       uint8_t lock, bool dma)
 {
     uint8_t *p;
 
     mapcache_lock();
-    p = xen_map_cache_unlocked(phys_addr, size, lock);
+    p = xen_map_cache_unlocked(phys_addr, size, lock, dma);
     mapcache_unlock();
     return p;
 }
@@ -426,8 +428,11 @@ void xen_invalidate_map_cache(void)
     mapcache_lock();
 
     QTAILQ_FOREACH(reventry, &mapcache->locked_entries, next) {
-        DPRINTF("There should be no locked mappings at this time, "
-                "but "TARGET_FMT_plx" -> %p is present\n",
+        if (!reventry->dma) {
+            continue;
+        }
+        fprintf(stderr, "Locked DMA mapping while invalidating mapcache!"
+                " "TARGET_FMT_plx" -> %p is present\n",
                 reventry->paddr_index, reventry->vaddr_req);
     }