pci/pcie: don't assume cap id 0 is reserved

VFIO actually wants to create a capability with ID == 0.
This is done to make guest drivers skip the given capability.
pcie_add_capability then trips up on this capability
when looking for end of capability list.

To support this use-case, it's easy enough to switch to
e.g. 0xffffffff for these comparisons - we can be sure
it will never match a 16-bit capability ID.

Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 7 insertions, 4 deletions

diff --git a/hw/pci/pcie.c b/hw/pci/pcie.c
index cbd4bb4f8c..f4dd177bc4 100644
--- a/hw/pci/pcie.c
+++ b/hw/pci/pcie.c
@@ -610,7 +610,8 @@ bool pcie_cap_is_arifwd_enabled(const PCIDevice *dev)
  * uint16_t ext_cap_size
  */
 
-static uint16_t pcie_find_capability_list(PCIDevice *dev, uint16_t cap_id,
+/* Passing a cap_id value > 0xffff will return 0 and put end of list in prev */
+static uint16_t pcie_find_capability_list(PCIDevice *dev, uint32_t cap_id,
                                           uint16_t *prev_p)
 {
     uint16_t prev = 0;
@@ -679,9 +680,11 @@ void pcie_add_capability(PCIDevice *dev,
     } else {
         uint16_t prev;
 
-        /* 0 is reserved cap id. use internally to find the last capability
-           in the linked list */
-        next = pcie_find_capability_list(dev, 0, &prev);
+        /*
+         * 0xffffffff is not a valid cap id (it's a 16 bit field). use
+         * internally to find the last capability in the linked list.
+         */
+        next = pcie_find_capability_list(dev, 0xffffffff, &prev);
 
         assert(prev >= PCI_CONFIG_SPACE_SIZE);
         assert(next == 0);