Merge tag 'for-upstream' of https://repo.or.cz/qemu/kevin into staging

Block layer patches

- Cleanup bs->backing and bs->file handling
- Refactor bdrv_try_set_aio_context using transactions
- Changes for improved coroutine_fn consistency
- vhost-user-blk: fix the resize crash
- io_uring: Use of io_uring_register_ring_fd() led to breakage, revert
- vvfat: Fix some problems with r/w mode
- Code cleanup
- MAINTAINERS: Fold "Block QAPI, monitor, ..." into "Block layer core"

# -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
#
# iQJFBAABCAAvFiEE3D3rFZqa+V09dFb+fwmycsiPL9YFAmNazhIRHGt3b2xmQHJl
# ZGhhdC5jb20ACgkQfwmycsiPL9ZyTw/8Dfck/SuxfyeLlnQItkjaV4cnqWOU8vHs
# 9x0KhlptCs+HXdF/3iicpA0lHojn7mNnbdFGjPRY4E0LriQv91TQ5ycdEmrseFPf
# sgeQlgdKCVU/pHjZ2wYarm2pE43Cx85a5xuufmw+7w49dNNZn14l4t+DgviuClVM
# nuVaogfZFbYyetre+Qd2TgLl+gJ+0d4o7Zs5lSWLrT8t0L9AGkcWPA7Nrbl6loIE
# dOautV4G7jLjuMiCeJZOGcnuRVe3gCQ5rCGBFzzH4DUtz4BmiYx4hd3LMEsP0PMM
# CrsfDZS04Ztybl9M7TmJuwkAm1gx1JDMOuJuh18lbJocIOBvhkKKxY2wI5LIdZVI
# ZntmU36RowkX+GGu/PYpYyMjBDClJppZCl7vnjyLYsVt6r0Vu6SmlHpJhcRYabhe
# 96Kv1LXH9A6+ogKPU3Layw6JGjg01GNr1ALuT7PO3pGto/JshmOuBEJJDucoF84M
# 5AfxFCohMROVldwblA6M0eKnlQBgtr5BvtgbV54BBo88VlFJgDJFQn7R09cTFUEo
# UwaJoS+nIaiZ0bQQVZhZloVppUaTdVJojzfVRCZZctga96/tu1HSFnGLnbEFpUN3
# KOf+XnVNS6Ro+nPSDf9bMjbIom2JicGFfV+6yMgIoxY/d5UA2dTZfefil4TAlSod
# 6PsTgg+jrm8=
# =/Fw0
# -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
# gpg: Signature made Thu 27 Oct 2022 14:29:38 EDT
# gpg:                using RSA key DC3DEB159A9AF95D3D7456FE7F09B272C88F2FD6
# gpg:                issuer "kwolf@redhat.com"
# gpg: Good signature from "Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>" [full]
# Primary key fingerprint: DC3D EB15 9A9A F95D 3D74  56FE 7F09 B272 C88F 2FD6

* tag 'for-upstream' of https://repo.or.cz/qemu/kevin: (58 commits)
  block/block-backend: blk_set_enable_write_cache is IO_CODE
  monitor: switch to *_co_* functions
  vmdk: switch to *_co_* functions
  vhdx: switch to *_co_* functions
  vdi: switch to *_co_* functions
  qed: switch to *_co_* functions
  qcow2: switch to *_co_* functions
  qcow: switch to *_co_* functions
  parallels: switch to *_co_* functions
  mirror: switch to *_co_* functions
  block: switch to *_co_* functions
  commit: switch to *_co_* functions
  vmdk: manually add more coroutine_fn annotations
  qcow2: manually add more coroutine_fn annotations
  qcow: manually add more coroutine_fn annotations
  blkdebug: add missing coroutine_fn annotation for indirect-called functions
  qcow2: add coroutine_fn annotation for indirect-called functions
  block: add missing coroutine_fn annotation to BlockDriverState callbacks
  coroutine-io: add missing coroutine_fn annotation to prototypes
  coroutine-lock: add missing coroutine_fn annotation to prototypes
  ...

Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>

1 files changed, 66 insertions, 38 deletions

diff --git a/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c b/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c
index a6e3bb79be..c522591531 100644
--- a/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c
+++ b/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c
@@ -26,6 +26,8 @@
 
 static BlockDriver bdrv_pass_through = {
     .format_name = "pass-through",
+    .is_filter = true,
+    .filtered_child_is_backing = true,
     .bdrv_child_perm = bdrv_default_perms,
 };
 
@@ -57,6 +59,8 @@ static void exclusive_write_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
 
 static BlockDriver bdrv_exclusive_writer = {
     .format_name = "exclusive-writer",
+    .is_filter = true,
+    .filtered_child_is_backing = true,
     .bdrv_child_perm = exclusive_write_perms,
 };
 
@@ -134,7 +138,7 @@ static void test_update_perm_tree(void)
     blk_insert_bs(root, bs, &error_abort);
 
     bdrv_attach_child(filter, bs, "child", &child_of_bds,
-                      BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED | BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY, &error_abort);
+                      BDRV_CHILD_DATA, &error_abort);
 
     ret = bdrv_append(filter, bs, NULL);
     g_assert_cmpint(ret, <, 0);
@@ -228,11 +232,14 @@ static void test_parallel_exclusive_write(void)
      */
     bdrv_ref(base);
 
-    bdrv_attach_child(top, fl1, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_DATA,
+    bdrv_attach_child(top, fl1, "backing", &child_of_bds,
+                      BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED | BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY,
                       &error_abort);
-    bdrv_attach_child(fl1, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED,
+    bdrv_attach_child(fl1, base, "backing", &child_of_bds,
+                      BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED | BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY,
                       &error_abort);
-    bdrv_attach_child(fl2, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED,
+    bdrv_attach_child(fl2, base, "backing", &child_of_bds,
+                      BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED | BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY,
                       &error_abort);
 
     bdrv_replace_node(fl1, fl2, &error_abort);
@@ -241,13 +248,26 @@ static void test_parallel_exclusive_write(void)
     bdrv_unref(top);
 }
 
-static void write_to_file_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
-                                     BdrvChildRole role,
-                                     BlockReopenQueue *reopen_queue,
-                                     uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
-                                     uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared)
+/*
+ * write-to-selected node may have several DATA children, one of them may be
+ * "selected". Exclusive write permission is taken on selected child.
+ *
+ * We don't realize write handler itself, as we need only to test how permission
+ * update works.
+ */
+typedef struct BDRVWriteToSelectedState {
+    BdrvChild *selected;
+} BDRVWriteToSelectedState;
+
+static void write_to_selected_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
+                                    BdrvChildRole role,
+                                    BlockReopenQueue *reopen_queue,
+                                    uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared,
+                                    uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared)
 {
-    if (bs->file && c == bs->file) {
+    BDRVWriteToSelectedState *s = bs->opaque;
+
+    if (s->selected && c == s->selected) {
         *nperm = BLK_PERM_WRITE;
         *nshared = BLK_PERM_ALL & ~BLK_PERM_WRITE;
     } else {
@@ -256,9 +276,10 @@ static void write_to_file_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c,
     }
 }
 
-static BlockDriver bdrv_write_to_file = {
-    .format_name = "tricky-perm",
-    .bdrv_child_perm = write_to_file_perms,
+static BlockDriver bdrv_write_to_selected = {
+    .format_name = "write-to-selected",
+    .instance_size = sizeof(BDRVWriteToSelectedState),
+    .bdrv_child_perm = write_to_selected_perms,
 };
 
 
@@ -266,15 +287,18 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_write_to_file = {
  * The following test shows that topological-sort order is required for
  * permission update, simple DFS is not enough.
  *
- * Consider the block driver which has two filter children: one active
- * with exclusive write access and one inactive with no specific
- * permissions.
+ * Consider the block driver (write-to-selected) which has two children: one is
+ * selected so we have exclusive write access to it and for the other one we
+ * don't need any specific permissions.
  *
  * And, these two children has a common base child, like this:
+ *   (additional "top" on top is used in test just because the only public
+ *    function to update permission should get a specific child to update.
+ *    Making bdrv_refresh_perms() public just for this test isn't worth it)
  *
- * ┌─────┐     ┌──────┐
- * │ fl2 │ ◀── │ top  │
- * └─────┘     └──────┘
+ * ┌─────┐     ┌───────────────────┐     ┌─────┐
+ * │ fl2 │ ◀── │ write-to-selected │ ◀── │ top │
+ * └─────┘     └───────────────────┘     └─────┘
  *   │           │
  *   │           │ w
  *   │           ▼
@@ -290,14 +314,14 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_write_to_file = {
  *
  * So, exclusive write is propagated.
  *
- * Assume, we want to make fl2 active instead of fl1.
- * So, we set some option for top driver and do permission update.
+ * Assume, we want to select fl2 instead of fl1.
+ * So, we set some option for write-to-selected driver and do permission update.
  *
  * With simple DFS, if permission update goes first through
- * top->fl1->base branch it will succeed: it firstly drop exclusive write
- * permissions and than apply them for another BdrvChildren.
- * But if permission update goes first through top->fl2->base branch it
- * will fail, as when we try to update fl2->base child, old not yet
+ * write-to-selected -> fl1 -> base branch it will succeed: it firstly drop
+ * exclusive write permissions and than apply them for another BdrvChildren.
+ * But if permission update goes first through write-to-selected -> fl2 -> base
+ * branch it will fail, as when we try to update fl2->base child, old not yet
  * updated fl1->base child will be in conflict.
  *
  * With topological-sort order we always update parents before children, so fl1
@@ -306,9 +330,10 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_write_to_file = {
 static void test_parallel_perm_update(void)
 {
     BlockDriverState *top = no_perm_node("top");
-    BlockDriverState *tricky =
-            bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_write_to_file, "tricky", BDRV_O_RDWR,
+    BlockDriverState *ws =
+            bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_write_to_selected, "ws", BDRV_O_RDWR,
                                  &error_abort);
+    BDRVWriteToSelectedState *s = ws->opaque;
     BlockDriverState *base = no_perm_node("base");
     BlockDriverState *fl1 = pass_through_node("fl1");
     BlockDriverState *fl2 = pass_through_node("fl2");
@@ -320,33 +345,35 @@ static void test_parallel_perm_update(void)
      */
     bdrv_ref(base);
 
-    bdrv_attach_child(top, tricky, "file", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_DATA,
+    bdrv_attach_child(top, ws, "file", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_DATA,
                       &error_abort);
-    c_fl1 = bdrv_attach_child(tricky, fl1, "first", &child_of_bds,
-                              BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED, &error_abort);
-    c_fl2 = bdrv_attach_child(tricky, fl2, "second", &child_of_bds,
-                              BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED, &error_abort);
-    bdrv_attach_child(fl1, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED,
+    c_fl1 = bdrv_attach_child(ws, fl1, "first", &child_of_bds,
+                              BDRV_CHILD_DATA, &error_abort);
+    c_fl2 = bdrv_attach_child(ws, fl2, "second", &child_of_bds,
+                              BDRV_CHILD_DATA, &error_abort);
+    bdrv_attach_child(fl1, base, "backing", &child_of_bds,
+                      BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED | BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY,
                       &error_abort);
-    bdrv_attach_child(fl2, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED,
+    bdrv_attach_child(fl2, base, "backing", &child_of_bds,
+                      BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED | BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY,
                       &error_abort);
 
     /* Select fl1 as first child to be active */
-    tricky->file = c_fl1;
+    s->selected = c_fl1;
     bdrv_child_refresh_perms(top, top->children.lh_first, &error_abort);
 
     assert(c_fl1->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE);
     assert(!(c_fl2->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE));
 
     /* Now, try to switch active child and update permissions */
-    tricky->file = c_fl2;
+    s->selected = c_fl2;
     bdrv_child_refresh_perms(top, top->children.lh_first, &error_abort);
 
     assert(c_fl2->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE);
     assert(!(c_fl1->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE));
 
     /* Switch once more, to not care about real child order in the list */
-    tricky->file = c_fl1;
+    s->selected = c_fl1;
     bdrv_child_refresh_perms(top, top->children.lh_first, &error_abort);
 
     assert(c_fl1->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE);
@@ -379,7 +406,8 @@ static void test_append_greedy_filter(void)
     BlockDriverState *base = no_perm_node("base");
     BlockDriverState *fl = exclusive_writer_node("fl1");
 
-    bdrv_attach_child(top, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_COW,
+    bdrv_attach_child(top, base, "backing", &child_of_bds,
+                      BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED | BDRV_CHILD_PRIMARY,
                       &error_abort);
 
     bdrv_append(fl, base, &error_abort);