diff options
| author | Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> | 2021-04-30 13:46:42 +0100 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org> | 2021-04-30 13:46:42 +0100 |
| commit | f38d1ea49711232651a817ec9d04c9d9e4816c44 (patch) | |
| tree | a3f1600f9a56e1e39b0dc830dd0f8fa005b46c6a /tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c | |
| parent | c3811c08ac0c80e9d823317dde07b4c12de67069 (diff) | |
| parent | 68bf7336533faa6aa90fdd4558edddbf5d8ef814 (diff) | |
| download | focaccia-qemu-f38d1ea49711232651a817ec9d04c9d9e4816c44.tar.gz focaccia-qemu-f38d1ea49711232651a817ec9d04c9d9e4816c44.zip | |
Merge remote-tracking branch 'remotes/kevin/tags/for-upstream' into staging
Block layer patches - Fix permission update order problems with block graph changes - qemu-img convert: Unshare write permission for source - vhost-user-blk: Fail gracefully on too large queue size # gpg: Signature made Fri 30 Apr 2021 11:27:51 BST # gpg: using RSA key DC3DEB159A9AF95D3D7456FE7F09B272C88F2FD6 # gpg: issuer "kwolf@redhat.com" # gpg: Good signature from "Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>" [full] # Primary key fingerprint: DC3D EB15 9A9A F95D 3D74 56FE 7F09 B272 C88F 2FD6 * remotes/kevin/tags/for-upstream: (39 commits) vhost-user-blk: Fail gracefully on too large queue size qemu-img convert: Unshare write permission for source block: Add BDRV_O_NO_SHARE for blk_new_open() block: refactor bdrv_node_check_perm() block: rename bdrv_replace_child_safe() to bdrv_replace_child() block: refactor bdrv_child_set_perm_safe() transaction action block: inline bdrv_replace_child() block: inline bdrv_check_perm_common() block: drop unused permission update functions block: bdrv_reopen_multiple: refresh permissions on updated graph block: bdrv_reopen_multiple(): move bdrv_flush to separate pre-prepare block: add bdrv_set_backing_noperm() transaction action block: make bdrv_refresh_limits() to be a transaction action block: make bdrv_unset_inherits_from to be a transaction action block: drop ignore_children for permission update functions block/backup-top: drop .active block: introduce bdrv_drop_filter() block: add bdrv_remove_filter_or_cow transaction action block: adapt bdrv_append() for inserting filters block: split out bdrv_replace_node_noperm() ... Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Diffstat (limited to 'tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c')
| -rw-r--r-- | tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c | 209 |
1 files changed, 208 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c b/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c index c4f7d16039..88f25c0cdb 100644 --- a/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c +++ b/tests/unit/test-bdrv-graph-mod.c @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ /* * Block node graph modifications tests * - * Copyright (c) 2019 Virtuozzo International GmbH. All rights reserved. + * Copyright (c) 2019-2021 Virtuozzo International GmbH. All rights reserved. * * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify * it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by @@ -44,6 +44,21 @@ static BlockDriver bdrv_no_perm = { .bdrv_child_perm = no_perm_default_perms, }; +static void exclusive_write_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c, + BdrvChildRole role, + BlockReopenQueue *reopen_queue, + uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared, + uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared) +{ + *nperm = BLK_PERM_WRITE; + *nshared = BLK_PERM_ALL & ~BLK_PERM_WRITE; +} + +static BlockDriver bdrv_exclusive_writer = { + .format_name = "exclusive-writer", + .bdrv_child_perm = exclusive_write_perms, +}; + static BlockDriverState *no_perm_node(const char *name) { return bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_no_perm, name, BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort); @@ -55,6 +70,12 @@ static BlockDriverState *pass_through_node(const char *name) BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort); } +static BlockDriverState *exclusive_writer_node(const char *name) +{ + return bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_exclusive_writer, name, + BDRV_O_RDWR, &error_abort); +} + /* * test_update_perm_tree * @@ -117,6 +138,7 @@ static void test_update_perm_tree(void) ret = bdrv_append(filter, bs, NULL); g_assert_cmpint(ret, <, 0); + bdrv_unref(filter); blk_unref(root); } @@ -181,10 +203,189 @@ static void test_should_update_child(void) bdrv_append(filter, bs, &error_abort); g_assert(target->backing->bs == bs); + bdrv_unref(filter); bdrv_unref(bs); blk_unref(root); } +/* + * test_parallel_exclusive_write + * + * Check that when we replace node, old permissions of the node being removed + * doesn't break the replacement. + */ +static void test_parallel_exclusive_write(void) +{ + BlockDriverState *top = exclusive_writer_node("top"); + BlockDriverState *base = no_perm_node("base"); + BlockDriverState *fl1 = pass_through_node("fl1"); + BlockDriverState *fl2 = pass_through_node("fl2"); + + /* + * bdrv_attach_child() eats child bs reference, so we need two @base + * references for two filters: + */ + bdrv_ref(base); + + bdrv_attach_child(top, fl1, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_DATA, + &error_abort); + bdrv_attach_child(fl1, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED, + &error_abort); + bdrv_attach_child(fl2, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED, + &error_abort); + + bdrv_replace_node(fl1, fl2, &error_abort); + + bdrv_unref(fl2); + bdrv_unref(top); +} + +static void write_to_file_perms(BlockDriverState *bs, BdrvChild *c, + BdrvChildRole role, + BlockReopenQueue *reopen_queue, + uint64_t perm, uint64_t shared, + uint64_t *nperm, uint64_t *nshared) +{ + if (bs->file && c == bs->file) { + *nperm = BLK_PERM_WRITE; + *nshared = BLK_PERM_ALL & ~BLK_PERM_WRITE; + } else { + *nperm = 0; + *nshared = BLK_PERM_ALL; + } +} + +static BlockDriver bdrv_write_to_file = { + .format_name = "tricky-perm", + .bdrv_child_perm = write_to_file_perms, +}; + + +/* + * The following test shows that topological-sort order is required for + * permission update, simple DFS is not enough. + * + * Consider the block driver which has two filter children: one active + * with exclusive write access and one inactive with no specific + * permissions. + * + * And, these two children has a common base child, like this: + * + * ┌─────┐ ┌──────┐ + * │ fl2 │ ◀── │ top │ + * └─────┘ └──────┘ + * │ │ + * │ │ w + * │ ▼ + * │ ┌──────┐ + * │ │ fl1 │ + * │ └──────┘ + * │ │ + * │ │ w + * │ ▼ + * │ ┌──────┐ + * └───────▶ │ base │ + * └──────┘ + * + * So, exclusive write is propagated. + * + * Assume, we want to make fl2 active instead of fl1. + * So, we set some option for top driver and do permission update. + * + * With simple DFS, if permission update goes first through + * top->fl1->base branch it will succeed: it firstly drop exclusive write + * permissions and than apply them for another BdrvChildren. + * But if permission update goes first through top->fl2->base branch it + * will fail, as when we try to update fl2->base child, old not yet + * updated fl1->base child will be in conflict. + * + * With topological-sort order we always update parents before children, so fl1 + * and fl2 are both updated when we update base and there is no conflict. + */ +static void test_parallel_perm_update(void) +{ + BlockDriverState *top = no_perm_node("top"); + BlockDriverState *tricky = + bdrv_new_open_driver(&bdrv_write_to_file, "tricky", BDRV_O_RDWR, + &error_abort); + BlockDriverState *base = no_perm_node("base"); + BlockDriverState *fl1 = pass_through_node("fl1"); + BlockDriverState *fl2 = pass_through_node("fl2"); + BdrvChild *c_fl1, *c_fl2; + + /* + * bdrv_attach_child() eats child bs reference, so we need two @base + * references for two filters: + */ + bdrv_ref(base); + + bdrv_attach_child(top, tricky, "file", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_DATA, + &error_abort); + c_fl1 = bdrv_attach_child(tricky, fl1, "first", &child_of_bds, + BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED, &error_abort); + c_fl2 = bdrv_attach_child(tricky, fl2, "second", &child_of_bds, + BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED, &error_abort); + bdrv_attach_child(fl1, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED, + &error_abort); + bdrv_attach_child(fl2, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_FILTERED, + &error_abort); + + /* Select fl1 as first child to be active */ + tricky->file = c_fl1; + bdrv_child_refresh_perms(top, top->children.lh_first, &error_abort); + + assert(c_fl1->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE); + assert(!(c_fl2->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE)); + + /* Now, try to switch active child and update permissions */ + tricky->file = c_fl2; + bdrv_child_refresh_perms(top, top->children.lh_first, &error_abort); + + assert(c_fl2->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE); + assert(!(c_fl1->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE)); + + /* Switch once more, to not care about real child order in the list */ + tricky->file = c_fl1; + bdrv_child_refresh_perms(top, top->children.lh_first, &error_abort); + + assert(c_fl1->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE); + assert(!(c_fl2->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE)); + + bdrv_unref(top); +} + +/* + * It's possible that filter required permissions allows to insert it to backing + * chain, like: + * + * 1. [top] -> [filter] -> [base] + * + * but doesn't allow to add it as a branch: + * + * 2. [filter] --\ + * v + * [top] -> [base] + * + * So, inserting such filter should do all graph modifications and only then + * update permissions. If we try to go through intermediate state [2] and update + * permissions on it we'll fail. + * + * Let's check that bdrv_append() can append such a filter. + */ +static void test_append_greedy_filter(void) +{ + BlockDriverState *top = exclusive_writer_node("top"); + BlockDriverState *base = no_perm_node("base"); + BlockDriverState *fl = exclusive_writer_node("fl1"); + + bdrv_attach_child(top, base, "backing", &child_of_bds, BDRV_CHILD_COW, + &error_abort); + + bdrv_append(fl, base, &error_abort); + bdrv_unref(fl); + bdrv_unref(top); +} + int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { bdrv_init(); @@ -195,6 +396,12 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[]) g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/update-perm-tree", test_update_perm_tree); g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/should-update-child", test_should_update_child); + g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-perm-update", + test_parallel_perm_update); + g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/parallel-exclusive-write", + test_parallel_exclusive_write); + g_test_add_func("/bdrv-graph-mod/append-greedy-filter", + test_append_greedy_filter); return g_test_run(); } |