diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-05-21 21:21:26 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-05-21 21:21:26 +0200 |
| commit | 4b927bc37359dec23f67d3427fc982945f24f404 (patch) | |
| tree | 245449ef9146942dc7fffd0235b48b7e70a00bf2 /gitlab/issues/target_riscv/host_missing/accel_missing/1647.toml | |
| parent | aa8bd79cec7bf6790ddb01d156c2ef2201abbaab (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-4b927bc37359dec23f67d3427fc982945f24f404.tar.gz qemu-analysis-4b927bc37359dec23f67d3427fc982945f24f404.zip | |
add gitlab issues in toml format
Diffstat (limited to 'gitlab/issues/target_riscv/host_missing/accel_missing/1647.toml')
| -rw-r--r-- | gitlab/issues/target_riscv/host_missing/accel_missing/1647.toml | 22 |
1 files changed, 22 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/gitlab/issues/target_riscv/host_missing/accel_missing/1647.toml b/gitlab/issues/target_riscv/host_missing/accel_missing/1647.toml new file mode 100644 index 000000000..921fbb2de --- /dev/null +++ b/gitlab/issues/target_riscv/host_missing/accel_missing/1647.toml @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +id = 1647 +title = "Potential Bug in RISCV Hypervisor Extension: Timer Interrupt Handling in QEMU v8.0.0-rc1" +state = "opened" +created_at = "2023-05-12T02:41:56.024Z" +closed_at = "n/a" +labels = ["target: riscv", "workflow::Triaged"] +url = "https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/issues/1647" +host-os = "Ubuntu 20.04.5 LTS" +host-arch = "x86_64" +qemu-version = "v8.0.0-rc1" +guest-os = "Linux" +guest-arch = "RISCV" +description = "n/a" +reproduce = """1. Build and run a simple hypervisor on QEMU v8.0.0-rc1 with the hypervisor extension feature of RISCV. +2. Set up hideleg, henvcfg, etc., in hypervisor and run the Linux kernel. +3. Observe the issue of infinite loop caused by the pending timer interrupt.""" +additional = """Linux version: riscv_aia_v1 from github.com/avpatel/linux +OpenSBI version: Modified 1.1 + +I would greatly appreciate it if you could kindly provide some guidance. Is this behavior expected or could this be a bug? I've tried to provide a detailed analysis of my observations, but I'm not 100% certain if my understanding is correct. + +Thank you for your time and consideration.""" |