diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-06-16 16:59:00 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-06-16 16:59:33 +0000 |
| commit | 9aba81d8eb048db908c94a3c40c25a5fde0caee6 (patch) | |
| tree | b765e7fb5e9a3c2143c68b0414e0055adb70e785 /results/classifier/118/hypervisor/1647 | |
| parent | b89a938452613061c0f1f23e710281cf5c83cb29 (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-9aba81d8eb048db908c94a3c40c25a5fde0caee6.tar.gz qemu-analysis-9aba81d8eb048db908c94a3c40c25a5fde0caee6.zip | |
add 18th iteration of classifier
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/118/hypervisor/1647')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/118/hypervisor/1647 | 42 |
1 files changed, 42 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/118/hypervisor/1647 b/results/classifier/118/hypervisor/1647 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e0bcc767c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/118/hypervisor/1647 @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +hypervisor: 0.985 +kernel: 0.957 +risc-v: 0.892 +device: 0.773 +graphic: 0.705 +vnc: 0.629 +architecture: 0.585 +network: 0.551 +ppc: 0.547 +permissions: 0.536 +socket: 0.523 +register: 0.505 +semantic: 0.502 +files: 0.485 +arm: 0.424 +boot: 0.413 +performance: 0.376 +debug: 0.376 +virtual: 0.361 +user-level: 0.324 +mistranslation: 0.316 +VMM: 0.310 +x86: 0.307 +i386: 0.307 +TCG: 0.302 +PID: 0.246 +peripherals: 0.125 +KVM: 0.113 +assembly: 0.100 + +Potential Bug in RISCV Hypervisor Extension: Timer Interrupt Handling in QEMU v8.0.0-rc1 +Steps to reproduce: +1. Build and run a simple hypervisor on QEMU v8.0.0-rc1 with the hypervisor extension feature of RISCV. +2. Set up hideleg, henvcfg, etc., in hypervisor and run the Linux kernel. +3. Observe the issue of infinite loop caused by the pending timer interrupt. +Additional information: +Linux version: riscv_aia_v1 from github.com/avpatel/linux +OpenSBI version: Modified 1.1 + +I would greatly appreciate it if you could kindly provide some guidance. Is this behavior expected or could this be a bug? I've tried to provide a detailed analysis of my observations, but I'm not 100% certain if my understanding is correct. + +Thank you for your time and consideration. |