add prompt-based classifier and first results with DeepSeek-R1:14b

2 files changed, 63 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/environments./1462640 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/environments./1462640
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e55268f56
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/environments./1462640
@@ -0,0 +1,40 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to understand this problem related to using shmat() in QEMU's MIPS emulation. Let me start by breaking down what's happening here.
+
+From the user's message, it looks like there are two strace outputs: one from running natively and another from running under QEMU-MIPS. The key difference seems to be how shmat() is called. 
+
+In the native case, shmat(72843341, 0xf38ea000, 0) returns 0xf38ea000 successfully. But in QEMU, the same call doesn't work because it's getting a different pointer (0xffffffff) and an error. The user mentioned that using SHM_REMAP might solve this.
+
+Wait, why does the native version not use any specific flags? It just passes 0 as the third argument for shmat(). But in QEMU, when they try to do the same, it fails. So maybe the issue is with how QEMU handles memory mappings versus the native system.
+
+The user also tried different flags. When they used SHM_REMAP or no flags (SHM_RND), it sometimes worked but not consistently. For example, shmat() failed when using 0x7f7df38c0000 as the address unless SHM_RND was set. Then, it succeeded and returned the same pointer.
+
+So, perhaps the problem is related to how QEMU's emulation of the MIPS architecture handles memory addresses, especially when it comes to shared memory segments. If the application expects a certain alignment or specific handling from shmat(), QEMU might not be emulating that correctly.
+
+I remember that in QEMU, some operations are handled by mmap on the host, but for MIPS64, maybe the way the address is mapped isn't compatible with the native system's approach. The user mentioned that without SHM_REMAP, QEMU doesn't handle the mapping properly because it relies on the host's mmap implementation.
+
+Also, the error EINVAL (22) suggests an invalid argument when using 0x7f7df38c0000 without flags. Maybe this address isn't aligned correctly for the host's memory management, but with SHM_RND, it gets adjusted, making it valid.
+
+Another thought: QEMU might not be passing the correct flags or handling the shmat() call as expected on MIPS64. If the emulation doesn't account for the way the host kernel handles certain address mappings, this could cause issues when applications try to use specific addresses.
+
+So, in summary, the problem seems to stem from how QEMU emulates memory operations, particularly with shared memory segments and address alignment. The native system can handle 0xf38ea000 without any issues because it's likely a valid address in that context, but under QEMU, especially when using a specific pointer like 0x7f7df38c0000, the address isn't suitable unless adjusted with SHM_RND.
+
+Therefore, to fix this, perhaps QEMU needs to ensure that when emulating shmat(), it correctly handles the flags and address alignment, possibly by allowing applications to use SHM_REMAP or ensuring that addresses passed are compatible with the host's memory management.
+</think>
+
+The issue arises because QEMU-MIPS does not handle the `shmat()` system call correctly when a specific address is requested. Unlike the native environment, which allows mapping at 0xf38ea000 without issues, QEMU fails unless certain flags like `SHM_RND` are used to adjust the address alignment.
+
+**Analysis:**
+1. **Address Handling in Native vs Emulated Environments:** 
+   - The native system successfully maps memory at a specific address (e.g., 0xf38ea000) without flags.
+   - QEMU, however, fails when using the same address unless `SHM_RND` is applied, which adjusts the address to be properly aligned.
+
+2. **Flags and Address Alignment:**
+   - Using `SHM_RND` allows the system to round the address to a valid segment, resolving alignment issues.
+   - Without such flags, QEMU may pass invalid addresses that the kernel can't handle, leading to errors like `EINVAL`.
+
+3. **Emulation Limitations:**
+   - QEMU's emulation might not correctly replicate how the native MIPS64 system handles memory mappings, especially regarding address validity and alignment.
+
+**Conclusion:**
+To resolve this issue, applications should use flags like `SHM_RND` when calling `shmat()` under QEMU-MIPS to ensure proper address handling. Additionally, QEMU could be enhanced to better emulate the target architecture's memory management, allowing for more consistent behavior across environments.
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/environments./1908489 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/environments./1908489
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a79b6b914
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/environments./1908489
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification step by step. The user has provided a detailed issue regarding QEMU/KVM and Hyper-V initialization leading to boot loops in nested virtualization setups. 
+
+First, the problem occurs when using QEMU with KVM on Linux hosts trying to run Windows guests that host their own Hyper-V environments. This setup leads to boot loop issues unless certain CPU flags are adjusted.
+
+Looking at the provided information, several factors point towards a kernel issue rather than a bug in QEMU itself. The user tested different Linux kernels (5.4, 5.8, and 5.10) and found that only specific versions caused the problem. This suggests that the issue might be related to how the host kernel handles virtualization features like XSAVE and MPX.
+
+Additionally, the user explored various workarounds such as disabling XSAVE in the guest OS using `bcdedit` or modifying the CPU flags with `-mpx`, which partially resolved the issue but didn't fully eliminate it. The focus shifted to the kernel version when the user noticed that certain versions (like 5.8) caused boot loops, while others (like 5.4 and 5.10) did not.
+
+The conclusion drawn was that the problem lies in the host's Linux kernel rather than QEMU. This aligns with common issues where virtualization features are either not handled correctly or have regressions between kernel versions. Therefore, it's more appropriate to address this issue within the context of the Linux kernel community rather than QEMU.
+
+Considering all these points, the classification should reflect that the issue is primarily a kernel bug affecting nested Hyper-V setups in QEMU/KVM environments.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue with nested virtualization where Windows guests using Hyper-V fail to initialize properly, leading to boot loops. The problem arises from specific host Linux kernels mishandling virtualization features like XSAVE and MPX when running nested Hyper-V instances.
+
+**Classification:**
+
+- **Bug Type:** Kernel Bug
+- **Component:** Linux Kernel (specifically related to KVM/QEMU interaction with virtualization extensions)
+- **Issue Scope:** Affects Nested Virtualization in QEMU/KVM setups
+
+This classification indicates that the primary issue lies within the host operating system's kernel, particularly how it handles certain CPU features necessary for nested Hyper-V environments.
\ No newline at end of file