add prompt-based classifier and first results with DeepSeek-R1:14b

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/implementation./1591611 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/implementation./1591611
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a7f0b0d20
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/implementation./1591611
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let's break down what's going on here.
+
+The user reported an issue when using `qemu-x86_64-static` on a ppc64el host to chroot into an amd64 environment. The problem seems to be with signals and fork() not working correctly, leading to assertion failures and segmentation faults.
+
+First, the error message mentions issues with `libc_fork` and `THREAD_GETMEM`, which points towards problems in how threads are being managed by the library. The user also talked about signal handlers not being implemented for x86_64, which means that when certain events occur (like a fork), QEMU doesn't handle them properly.
+
+The discussion then moves into patches being proposed to fix these issues. It seems like some progress was made with specific fixes, but the user still encountered problems after applying those patches. This indicates that there might be more underlying issues beyond just the signal handling.
+
+Looking deeper, the user mentions page size support in QEMU for x86/x86_64 systems. They realized that QEMU's user mode doesn't handle pages larger than 4k by default, which is a problem because PPC64 typically uses 64k pages. This suggests that there are architectural differences causing compatibility issues.
+
+The classification of the bug should consider whether it's related to signal handling, fork implementation, or page size support. Since the initial issue was with signals and fork leading to assertion errors, but deeper analysis points to a problem with how QEMU handles different page sizes across architectures, I think this falls under the broader category of architecture-specific issues rather than just signal handling.
+
+In QEMU's classification system, bugs can be categorized by their type, such as CPU, memory management, or device emulation. This bug seems to touch on multiple areas: signals (which relate to CPU/interrupts), fork (process creation), and page size support (memory management). However, the root cause appears to be architectural incompatibility when running x86_64 VMs on a PPC64 host with larger pages.
+
+Therefore, the most accurate classification would likely be under "Architecture" since it's an issue arising from differences between host and guest architectures, particularly regarding page sizes and how QEMU handles them. This aligns with the user's conclusion that the problem isn't fully resolved unless running on a kernel with 4k pages, which is the default for x86 systems but not for PPC64.
+
+So, putting it all together, the bug is primarily about handling architecture-specific differences, especially regarding page sizes and their impact on signal and fork operations in QEMU.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes issues encountered when using `qemu-x86_64-static` on a ppc64el host to chroot into an amd64 environment. The primary problems involve signal handling and fork() not functioning correctly, leading to assertion failures and segmentation faults. After initial patches were applied, the user still faced issues, indicating deeper architectural incompatibilities.
+
+**Classification:**
+
+- **Type:** Architecture
+  - **Reasoning:** The root cause stems from architectural differences, particularly regarding page size support between x86_64 guests and PPC64 hosts, which use larger pages by default. This classification highlights the issue's origin in handling architecture-specific nuances rather than a single feature like signal management.
+
+This classification captures the essence of the problem as an architecture-related challenge in QEMU's implementation.
\ No newline at end of file