restructure results

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 22 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/other/1136477 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/other/1136477
deleted file mode 100644
index bd3831ede..000000000
--- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/other/1136477
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,22 +0,0 @@
-<think>
-Alright, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
-
-The user is reporting that QEMU doesn't sanitize command line options carrying plaintext passwords. This means that when a user runs QEMU with a password for services like Spice or VNC, the password is visible in the process list (like ps awux). The bug report suggests that this is a security concern because sensitive information should not be exposed this way.
-
-Looking at the categories:
-
-- Mistranslation: This is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture. Doesn't fit here.
-- Assembly: Lowering assembly code issues. Not relevant.
-- Other: A general category, but maybe too broad.
-- Device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor: These seem specific to particular functionalities.
-
-The issue is related to command line options and password security. The mention of VNC suggests it's tied to the VNC feature in QEMU. However, the problem isn't directly about VNC itself but about how command-line arguments are handled—specifically, not sanitizing them to hide passwords.
-
-Since the bug report points out that plaintext passwords are visible via ps, it's more about security and command-line argument handling rather than a specific component like VNC or KVM. The user also refers to an external bug (Red Hat) where similar issues were discussed. 
-
-The project maintainer's response indicates they don't consider this a security issue but more of an enhancement request. Therefore, it doesn't fall under a category related to known components like network or device drivers.
-
-Considering all options, the most appropriate category seems to be 'other' because it's not directly tied to any specific listed component but is still a valid concern about command-line handling and security.
-</think>
-
-other
\ No newline at end of file