summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/other/1798659
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-26 07:33:21 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-26 07:33:21 +0000
commitba2789bd7d81618a42dc7f69706a7acfa591630a (patch)
tree4aae3f6659946b6da5b436f38a7786a632c930be /results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/other/1798659
parent9aba81d8eb048db908c94a3c40c25a5fde0caee6 (diff)
downloadqemu-analysis-ba2789bd7d81618a42dc7f69706a7acfa591630a.tar.gz
qemu-analysis-ba2789bd7d81618a42dc7f69706a7acfa591630a.zip
add prompt-based classifier and first results with DeepSeek-R1:14b
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/other/1798659')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/other/179865923
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/other/1798659 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/other/1798659
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c23cd4dbe
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/other/1798659
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem again.
+
+The user is pointing out that in the file trace/simple.c, specifically in the writeout_thread function, there are two lines where commas are used instead of semicolons at the end of statements. They provided an example showing how using commas can change the structure of the code but doesn't cause a functional bug. The main issue here is about code style and readability rather than actual functionality.
+
+Looking at the list of possible categories, I see options like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. I need to determine which category best fits this bug report.
+
+Since the problem is related to the syntax of C code—specifically, incorrect use of semicolons versus commas—it doesn't fall under any specific functionality area like networking or graphics. It's more about coding style and proper syntax usage. 
+
+The categories that might be closest are "mistranslation" if it's a semantic error in translation from source to target, but in this case, the code still works as intended despite the stylistic issue. Alternatively, maybe "other" since it doesn't fit into any specific functional category.
+
+I think the most appropriate category here is "mistranslation," but I'm not entirely sure because it's more about style than actual semantic errors. However, given the options, "mistranslation" might be a stretch. Alternatively, maybe it should be classified under "other" since it doesn't directly relate to any specific component like KVM or network.
+
+Wait, another thought: The bug is about code syntax, which could also be considered part of the compiler's job (like in the translation from source to IR). But I'm not certain. Alternatively, perhaps it's better to classify it under "other" because it's a minor style issue that doesn't impact functionality.
+
+I think "other" is the safest choice here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report addresses a stylistic issue with code syntax, specifically the use of commas instead of semicolons in C statements. This does not affect functionality but relates to coding style and readability. Among the given categories, none directly pertain to code style or syntax issues. The closest fit would be "other" as it doesn't fall under any specific functional area.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file