diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 19:39:53 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 19:39:53 +0200 |
| commit | dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6 (patch) | |
| tree | 418478faf06786701a56268672f73d6b0b4eb239 /results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/syscall | |
| parent | 4d9e26c0333abd39bdbd039dcdb30ed429c475ba (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6.tar.gz qemu-analysis-dee4dcba78baf712cab403d47d9db319ab7f95d6.zip | |
restructure results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/syscall')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/syscall/1810433 | 24 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 24 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/syscall/1810433 b/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/syscall/1810433 deleted file mode 100644 index 8fc16b64e..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-1/reasoning/syscall/1810433 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,24 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, so I have to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem and figure out which category it fits best. - -The user reports an issue with the `pwrite()` function in `aarch64-linux-user`. They noticed that when calling `pwrite(fd, NULL, 0, 0)`, QEMU returns `-1` instead of `0` as expected. This inconsistency happens only on the QEMU emulator and not on native aarch64 or x86_64 systems. - -Looking at the provided code sample, it's clear that the problem is related to how the syscall is handled in QEMU. The user mentioned that this issue was fixed for `write()` by a previous commit (58cfa6c...) but not yet addressed for `pwrite()`. They also provided a proposed patch and discussed that similar issues might exist elsewhere. - -The bug report involves system calls, specifically the behavior of `pwrite` under certain conditions. The user is concerned about POSIX conformance tests possibly missing such edge cases. It seems like this issue affects how QEMU emulates specific syscalls accurately. - -Now, considering the categories: -- **mistranslation**: Incorrect translation might relate to how guest code is translated into host instructions, but here it's more about syscall handling. -- **syscall**: This directly relates to how system calls are emulated. The problem arises in the `pwrite` syscall not behaving as expected in QEMU. -- Other categories like networking or memory don't seem relevant here. - -The issue is specifically about a system call returning incorrect values, so it falls under the syscall category. -</think> - -**Answer:** - -The bug report describes an inconsistency in how QEMU handles the `pwrite()` system call. The issue arises when calling `pwrite(fd, NULL, 0, 0)`, which should return `0` but returns `-1` in QEMU. This indicates a problem with the emulation of the syscall, making it fall under the **syscall** category. - -**Classification:** - -- **Category:** syscall \ No newline at end of file |