diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-06-30 12:34:26 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-06-30 12:35:44 +0000 |
| commit | 25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 (patch) | |
| tree | 0f056db167683be54ea1e5e72d29d6069af55e7d /results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM | |
| parent | 8e6da29e4ee5fc14bc1cc816a24f21271f14090d (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.tar.gz qemu-analysis-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.zip | |
add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM')
107 files changed, 1834 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1004408 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1004408 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e86bf65d3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1004408 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I have to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem carefully. + +The user is reporting a soft lockup and hard lockup issue when running a test through autotest. The environment details mention QEMU-KVM version 1.1-rc2, host kernel 3.4.0, guest OS Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6.2, and guest kernel 2.6.32. They're using VNC for display. + +The soft lockup occurred while running the cgroup test, causing the host to hang. The user also saw a hard lockup when trying again. No errors in /var/log/messages, but there's a call trace in the serial console. They couldn't reproduce it consistently. + +Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is about lockups during QEMU/KVM operation. The soft and hard lockup errors usually relate to the host kernel detecting a CPU that's stuck in a loop or not responding, often due to issues with virtualization. Since it's happening during KVM usage, this might be related to how KVM handles certain operations or interacts with the host kernel. + +The categories include 'KVM' as one of the options. The bug seems to be related to KVM's operation causing a lockup in the host, so 'KVM' is the most appropriate category here. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1037675 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1037675 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..dab3e551a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1037675 @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user is having an issue with their QEMU-KVM setup where the guest kernel panics when using "-cpu host". They upgraded from version 1.0.1-r1 to 1.1.1-r1 and noticed the problem. + +First, I'll break down what's happening here. The bug occurs when they specify "-cpu host", which tells QEMU to use the host's CPU configuration for the guest. This is typically used for better performance and compatibility. But in this case, it causes a panic during boot, specifically at intel_pmu_init. + +Looking at the provided categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. The issue seems related to how the CPU is being emulated or handled by QEMU-KVM. + +The fact that removing "-cpu host" fixes the problem suggests it's something specific to how the host CPU features are exposed to the guest. This could be a problem in the translation layer between the host and target architecture, but since KVM is involved (as indicated by -enable-kvm), it might be related to the hypervisor or kernel modules. + +I recall that intel_pmu_init is part of the Intel Performance Monitoring Unit, which is often handled by specific KVM modules. Maybe there's a regression in how QEMU-KVM 1.1.1 interacts with this when using "-cpu host". This could relate to the hypervisor layer since KVM runs as a hypervisor on top of the host OS. + +Alternatively, it might be an issue within the device emulation or specific hardware features exposed by the host CPU that aren't being handled correctly in QEMU-KVM 1.1.1. But considering the kernel panic at intel_pmu_init and the involvement of KVM modules, I'm leaning towards it being a hypervisor-related issue. + +Wait, but "hypervisor" is one of the categories. So maybe this is indeed under the "KVM" or "hypervisor" category. However, looking back, the user included "KVM" as one of the possible categories, so perhaps that's the right fit. + +But another angle: if it's a problem in how QEMU translates CPU instructions when using "-cpu host", that might fall under "mistranslation". But considering KVM is involved and it's more about the hypervisor's handling of CPU features, I think "KVM" or possibly "hypervisor" would be appropriate. + +Wait, but looking at the categories again, there are separate options: "KVM" and "hypervisor". Since KVM itself is a hypervisor, perhaps this issue is under the broader "hypervisor" category. However, given that it's specifically related to QEMU-KVM, which is the KVM component of QEMU, maybe "KVM" is more precise. + +But I'm a bit confused because sometimes issues with CPU handling in QEMU can be part of the translation layer (mistranslation). Alternatively, if it's about how KVM presents CPU features to the guest, that might fall under hypervisor or KVM. + +Wait, but in this case, the user is using "-cpu host", which enables host-passthrough. If there's a problem with this feature causing a panic, it could be due to incorrect handling of certain CPU instructions or features by QEMU-KVM when acting as the hypervisor. So perhaps "hypervisor" is more accurate. + +Alternatively, if it's a bug in how QEMU translates the host CPU's PMU (Performance Monitoring Unit) events into something the guest can handle, that might be "mistranslation". But given that KVM is involved and it's a kernel module interacting with hardware features, I think "hypervisor" or "KVM" would be better. + +Wait, but looking back at the categories provided by the user: KVM is listed as one of them. So perhaps the correct category is "KVM". But sometimes hypervisor issues in QEMU-KVM are under the "hypervisor" category. I'm a bit torn here. + +Alternatively, maybe it's related to how the guest OS initializes certain hardware features, which could be a device-related issue. But no, since it's a kernel panic during PMU init, which is more about CPU and hypervisor interaction. + +I think the best fit would be "hypervisor", but given that KVM is a specific part of QEMU, perhaps "KVM" is intended as its own category. So I'm leaning towards "KVM". +</think> + +The bug report involves a kernel panic when using `-cpu host` in QEMU-KVM 1.1.1, specifically during `intel_pmu_init`. This suggests an issue with how the hypervisor (QEMU-KVM) handles CPU features or hardware interactions, particularly under the Intel PMU subsystem. Since the problem arises from enabling host CPU configuration and is related to KVM's operation, it falls under the "hypervisor" category. + +**hypervisor** + +However, since "-cpu host" interacts directly with the KVM hypervisor layer, the correct category is: + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1062201 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1062201 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..caec0f089 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1062201 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +Looking at the bug report, the user is trying to start a QEMU VM using kvm-spice but it fails and dumps a core. The error message mentions "kvm-spice: ... register_subpage: Assertion failed." This suggests an issue within the KVM component or possibly with spice, which is used for remote desktop access. + +The error occurs in exec.c at line 2641, which is part of QEMU's code. Since the problem arises when using kvm-spice and not when using /usr/bin/kvm directly, it points towards an interaction issue between KVM and SPICE. The failure is during the initialization phase of spice, possibly due to a misconfiguration or a bug in how resources are being managed by the hypervisor. + +The categories related here could be 'hypervisor' since KVM is a hypervisor component, but the error seems more specific to the interaction between QEMU and SPICE. However, given that the main issue is with starting the VM through KVM and spice, the primary category would likely be 'KVM'. Alternatively, if it's an issue within the spice driver or interface handling, it might fall under 'other' since it doesn't neatly fit into the other categories provided. + +But considering the error message comes from QEMU's code during the execution phase, especially in a part related to memory management (subpage registration), and given that KVM is involved, I think the most appropriate category is 'hypervisor'. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1062589 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1062589 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8b4215b76 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1062589 @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The user has provided a detailed bug report about a corrupted XP guest disk when the data size exceeds 4 GB. Let me break down what's happening here. + +First, looking at the problem: When the data on disk C in the XP guest exceeds 4 GB, the disk gets corrupted. This leads to issues like needing chkdsk and errors from qemu-img check. The host is running QEMU version 1.2.0 and 1.2.50, which are older versions. + +The bug report mentions specific QEMU commands with KVM enabled, so it's using hardware acceleration. The virtual disks involved are QCOW2 format, which supports snapshots and has cluster-based storage. + +Looking at the qemu-img check output, there are multiple errors related to L1 entries being corrupted, invalid cluster offsets, and refcount issues. These seem to be low-level storage problems within the QCOW2 image. + +Now, considering the categories: The possible ones include kernel, hypervisor, device, network, KVM, etc. Since this is about disk corruption in a virtual machine guest, it's related to how QEMU handles storage for the VM. + +The errors point towards issues with how clusters are being managed in the QCOW2 image. This might be a bug in how QEMU writes or reads data from the image file when certain conditions are met, like exceeding 4 GB of data. It doesn't seem to be related directly to user-mode assembly or translation since it's about storage management. + +Looking at the possible categories again: 'mistranslation' is about incorrect mapping from source to target; that doesn't fit here. 'device' could relate to hardware devices, but this is more about storage. 'hypervisor' might be a possibility because QEMU acts as a hypervisor for KVM, but the issue seems specific to disk handling. + +Alternatively, 'storage' or something related isn't listed, so I have to pick from the given options. The problem arises when data exceeds 4 GB, causing corruption in the QCOW2 image. This likely points to an issue within QEMU's storage backend or how it handles larger files, which falls under the hypervisor's responsibilities as it manages virtualized resources. + +Wait, but 'hypervisor' might not be precise enough if the problem is more about disk I/O handling. Alternatively, since it's about the image file corruption, perhaps it's a kernel issue because QEMU interacts with the host's storage systems via the kernel. + +Hmm, but the errors are within the QCOW2 structure managed by QEMU itself, so maybe 'hypervisor' isn't the right fit. The problem is more about how QEMU writes to the image file, which could be part of its own implementation rather than the hypervisor's role in scheduling or hardware acceleration. + +Wait, KVM is involved because it's enabled with '-enable-kvm'. So perhaps the issue is related to KVM's handling of storage. But I'm not sure if that's directly the case here since the problem seems specific to how QEMU manages the QCOW2 image, which is part of its own storage backend. + +Alternatively, looking at the categories provided: 'kernel' might relate if it's a host kernel issue when accessing large files, but I don't have evidence pointing to that. The user reported issues within the guest, so maybe it's more about how QEMU presents the disk to the guest, which would fall under hypervisor functions. + +Wait, perhaps another angle: the bug occurs when data exceeds 4 GB, which is a common issue related to 32-bit addressing limits. Maybe there's an integer overflow or similar in QEMU's code that handles offsets beyond certain thresholds, causing corruption. This could be part of the 'hypervisor' category as it relates to how virtual resources are managed. + +Alternatively, considering that QCOW2 uses clusters and refcounts, which are low-level storage structures, this might point towards a bug in QEMU's block layer or storage management, which is part of the hypervisor's responsibilities. + +So after considering all these points, I think the most appropriate category is 'hypervisor' because it relates to how QEMU manages virtual disks and their storage, leading to corruption when certain thresholds are crossed. +</think> + +The bug report describes a disk corruption issue in a QEMU/KVM setup when the guest disk exceeds 4 GB. The errors from `qemu-img check` indicate problems with cluster management and reference counts within the QCOW2 image, suggesting issues in how QEMU handles storage. Since this relates to how QEMU manages virtual disks as part of its hypervisor functions, the appropriate classification is: + +**Hypervisor** + +This category captures the problem's nature as a QEMU issue affecting virtual disk handling under KVM. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1063807 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1063807 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ae62f5e77 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1063807 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user provided several possible categories like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, etc., and others. + +The bug report mentions that KVM crashes when booting a PointSec encrypted Windows 7 VM. KVM is a hypervisor used for virtualization. The issue occurs after installing Full Disk Encryption software. The error message points to an internal KVM error during emulation, which suggests something went wrong in the virtual machine's execution. + +Looking at the possible categories: the problem is related to KVM itself crashing, which is part of the hypervisor layer. So the category should be "KVM". Other possibilities like network or graphic don't seem relevant here since the issue isn't about connectivity or display problems. It's more about the hypervisor's ability to run the VM with encryption. +</think> + +The bug report involves KVM crashing, which is part of the hypervisor component. + +**Answer:** + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1162 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1162 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d2ecb11c8 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1162 @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's break it down. + +The user is having an issue when running `./configure` and gets a "big/little test failed" error while trying to statically link on Fedora 36. They mentioned that they couldn't find any information about this, so they're unsure how to fix it. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. I need to figure out which one fits best. + +The error message mentions a "big/little test failed." I'm not entirely sure what that refers to in QEMU's context. It might be related to CPU architecture or something else. Since the user is trying to build QEMU with static linking and specific flags, maybe it's an issue during the configuration or compilation process. + +I know that KVM is a hypervisor technology used by QEMU for virtualization. The user included `--enable-kvm` in their configure command. So perhaps this error is related to KVM support not being correctly detected or enabled. + +Alternatively, "big/little" could refer to CPU configurations, but I'm not sure how that ties into the build process here. Since the error occurs during configuration and static linking, it's more likely a setup issue rather than an assembly or translation problem. + +Another angle: the user is on Fedora 36, so maybe there are missing dependencies or library issues specific to their distribution when building statically. But the categories don't have 'distribution' or 'dependency' as options, so that might fall under 'other.' + +However, since KVM was explicitly enabled and it's a key feature for QEMU's hypervisor capabilities, the error could be related to KVM initialization or detection during the build. + +Wait, but the problem occurs in `./configure`, which is part of the build setup, not necessarily the runtime. So maybe it's a configuration test failure when checking for KVM support. The 'big/little' might refer to CPU features or endianness tests. + +I'm not entirely certain, but given that KVM was enabled and the error occurs during configure, which is part of the build setup, I think the closest category would be KVM. +</think> + +The bug report mentions an issue when enabling KVM with `--enable-kvm` in the configuration. The error occurs during the `./configure` step, suggesting a problem related to KVM support detection. Therefore, it falls under the KVM category. + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1169049 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1169049 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..51febab4d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1169049 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is having an issue with QEMU where setting a breakpoint in GDB doesn't work when they use the `-enable-kvm` option. They mentioned that without KVM, it works fine, but when KVM is enabled, GDB doesn't stop at the specified breakpoint. + +First, I need to understand what each category means. The possible categories are things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. + +The bug report specifically mentions `-enable-kvm`, which indicates that KVM acceleration is being used. Since the problem occurs when KVM is enabled but not otherwise, it's likely related to how QEMU interacts with the hypervisor or KVM in particular. + +Looking at the categories, "KVM" seems like the most direct fit here. The issue arises only when using KVM, so it's probably a bug within the KVM-specific code path of QEMU. Other categories like network or device don't seem relevant because the problem isn't about networking or hardware devices; it's specifically about GDB breakpoints not being hit. + +I should also consider if any other category might apply. For example, "hypervisor" could be a possibility since KVM acts as a hypervisor. However, in this context, the bug is within QEMU's handling of KVM, so "KVM" is more specific and appropriate. + +Additionally, the user mentioned that without KVM (i.e., when not using `-enable-kvm`), the breakpoints work correctly. This suggests that the problem lies in how QEMU with KVM handles debugging sessions, particularly with GDB. Therefore, the category should reflect the component causing the issue, which is KVM. + +In summary, the bug report points directly to an issue within the KVM functionality of QEMU when using GDB breakpoints. Thus, the correct classification is "KVM." +</think> + +The issue arises specifically when using `-enable-kvm`, pointing to a problem with how QEMU handles KVM in this scenario. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1219 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1219 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2f22e9997 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1219 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is having trouble enabling KVM in QEMU for the RISC-V 64-bit architecture. They followed the usual steps: cloning the repo and running `./configure` with `--target-list=riscv64-softmmu --enable-kvm`. But when they check, KVM support isn't enabled, and the log says it's NO. + +First, I need to understand what each category means. The options are mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The user is specifically mentioning `--enable-kvm` not working for `qemu-system-riscv64`. So the issue is related to KVM support in QEMU's RISC-V target. + +I know that enabling KVM requires certain configurations and sometimes specific host support. Maybe the problem is that the RISC-V softmmu target doesn't properly detect or enable KVM, despite the configure flag. This could be due to missing code in the target's setup or dependencies not being met. + +Looking at the categories, 'KVM' seems like the obvious choice because the bug directly relates to KVM functionality. The user is trying to enable it but isn't succeeding, so the issue falls under the KVM category. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1248959 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1248959 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..209ceff1c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1248959 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user is reporting that the pdpe1gb flag isn't supported in their guest system when running on Intel hardware. They mention that they need 1G hugepages and that while there's support for AMD, it's missing for Intel. + +First, I'll look at the provided categories to see which one fits best. The options are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, and others like hypervisor or CPU flags. + +The issue seems related to CPU feature support in QEMU. The user is using the Sandy Bridge processor, which supports pdpe1gb as part of its extended page tables (EPT). They've tried enabling it with the '+pdpe1gb' flag but might be encountering issues. + +Looking at the categories, 'hypervisor' isn't listed, so I have to choose from the available ones. The bug is about a missing CPU feature in the hypervisor context, which relates to how QEMU/KVM handles the guest's processor flags. This seems more related to KVM than other areas like networking or devices. + +So, the most appropriate category would be 'KVM' because it's about the virtualization aspect of QEMU and how it configures CPU features for the guest. Alternatively, if 'hypervisor' were an option, that might have been better, but since it's not, KVM is the closest fit. +</think> + +The bug report concerns missing support for the pdpe1gb flag in QEMU when running on Intel hardware, which affects 1G hugepages functionality. This issue falls under the category of virtualization handling within QEMU/KVM, specifically related to CPU feature configuration. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1254443 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1254443 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..38ba7452a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1254443 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The issue is about the LAPIC's periodic mode not firing interrupts when using KVM. Let me break it down. + +First, the problem occurs in KVM mode but works fine without it and in oneshot mode. Since KVM is involved, I know that KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is part of the hypervisor layer. The LAPIC (Local APIC) is related to interrupt controllers in virtual machines. + +The bug report mentions that periodic mode isn't firing interrupts correctly. This sounds like an issue with how the hypervisor or QEMU handles interrupt injection when running under KVM. Since it's specific to KVM usage, I should consider the 'KVM' category as a primary suspect. + +Looking at the other categories: It's not about assembly lowering (assembly), nor is it related to graphic issues or network problems directly. Permissions and performance don't seem relevant here. The problem isn't with booting, VNC, debug, files, kernel, peripherals, or hypervisor in general but more specifically how KVM interacts with the LAPIC. + +Therefore, the most appropriate category is 'KVM' because it's tied to how QEMU's KVM integration handles specific hardware components like the LAPIC. +</think> + +The bug report indicates an issue with KVM's handling of LAPIC interrupt injection. Since this relates directly to KVM functionality, the category is: + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1254940 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1254940 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..361210858 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1254940 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I have to classify this bug report into one of the categories provided. Let me read through the problem again. + +The user is encountering multiple ext3-fs errors after forced shutdowns using "virsh destroy". They're running QEMU-KVM with SUSE 10 as both host and guest, using qcow2 disks. The error messages in dmesg show issues with the file system on /dev/vda3. + +The main issue seems to be filesystem corruption caused by multiple forced shutdowns. Since they're using KVM, which is a hypervisor, I'm thinking that the problem might be related to how the virtual machine is being handled during shutdown. + +Looking at the categories: there's 'KVM' and 'hypervisor'. This bug relates directly to the behavior of KVM when VMs are forced to shut down. Forced shutdowns can cause abrupt halts which might not properly flush filesystem buffers, leading to corruption. So this seems like a hypervisor-related issue. + +Other options like 'filesystem', but that's more about the actual disk storage and might not be under QEMU-KVM's control. The problem is during VM operations, so KVM/hypervisor makes sense. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1257352 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1257352 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c82919217 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1257352 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is about KVM hanging occasionally when switching out of the QEMU console. + +Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others like mistranslation or assembly. + +The problem specifically mentions KVM, so that's a strong indicator. The user describes switching between consoles and QEMU becoming unresponsive. This seems related to how the virtual machine handles input or console switches, which ties into KVM functionality. + +I don't see any mention of networking, graphics issues, or other areas. It's more about the hypervisor (KVM) misbehaving when interacting with the console. So the most fitting category is KVM. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1270397 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1270397 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..89e72d519 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1270397 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification. The user mentioned that after live migrating their VM using QEMU/KVM, the system panics with a segmentation fault in systemd. + +First, I need to understand what each category means. Looking at the options: mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source architecture to target during compilation or execution. Assembly lowering relates to converting code into assembly. Other categories like device, graphic, network, etc., are more specific areas. + +The issue here involves live migration, which is a feature provided by KVM in QEMU. Live migration allows moving a running VM from one physical host to another without interrupting the guest OS. If during this process, the system crashes or causes a segfault in systemd (a crucial init system), it points towards a problem with how the virtualization layer handles certain operations. + +Systemd crashing suggests that some low-level issue is causing it to misbehave after migration. Since QEMU/KVM is involved and live migration is a KVM feature, the bug likely stems from incorrect handling during the migration process. This could be related to memory management, interrupt handling, or device emulation issues specific to KVM. + +Looking at the configuration provided, the VM uses virtio devices for disks, network, etc., which are standard in QEMU/KVM setups. The error occurs post-migration, so it's probably not a problem with the initial setup but something that happens during or after the migration process. + +The categories given don't have 'live migration' as an option, but KVM is one of them. Since live migration is part of the hypervisor functionality (KVM being the hypervisor), the issue falls under the KVM category. +</think> + +The bug report involves a segfault in systemd after live migration using QEMU/KVM. Since live migration is handled by KVM and this leads to a system crash, it's categorized under KVM. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1288259 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1288259 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ad66d6c3e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1288259 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<think> +Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided a detailed report about KVM VMs getting stuck and not being deletable due to a hardware error. + +First, the issue happens when creating instances via OpenStack's Nova API; they get stuck in the spawning state. When trying to delete them, they're stuck in deleting state. The error message mentions "KVM: entry failed, hardware error 0x0" and provides some CPU registers and other details. It also notes that all instances are paused. + +The user mentioned that the only way to delete the VM is by resetting it and resuming, after which deletion works properly. They're using OpenStack Havana on Ubuntu 12.04 with QEMU emulator version 1.2.0. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The error specifically mentions KVM and hardware errors during VM entry. The problem is related to VM state management when instances are created or deleted. Since it's a KVM issue with hardware-related problems during VM operations, the category should be 'KVM'. Other categories like device or network don't seem relevant here because the problem isn't about specific devices or networking but rather the hypervisor itself. +</think> + +The bug report mentions issues with KVM virtual machines (VMs) getting stuck in a paused state and not being deletable due to hardware errors. The error occurs during VM entry, which is handled by the KVM hypervisor. Additionally, the problem affects OpenStack instances managed via Nova API, indicating that it's related to the interaction between QEMU/KVM and the virtualization stack. + +Given that the issue specifically pertains to KVM functionality—entry failure, hardware errors, and VM state management—it falls under the category of "KVM." The other categories like device or network do not directly relate to this particular problem. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1294227 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1294227 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..97ed92e1e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1294227 @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories. Let me start by reading the bug report carefully. + +The bug is about "migration wrong handling of KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl". So it's related to the KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) and involves an ioctl call which isn't being handled correctly during migration, specifically with ARM. + +Looking at the code snippet provided: + +static int kvm_physical_sync_dirty_bitmap(....) +{ + .... + if(kvm_vm_ioctl(s, KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG, &d) == -1) { + - err out + } + ... continue +} + +The issue is that `kvm_vm_ioctl` can return values other than -1 upon failure, but the code only checks for -1. This leads to incorrect error handling when the ioctl call fails in a way that doesn't return -1, causing the migration to appear successful when it's actually failing to get the memslot dirty bitmap. + +The categories provided include 'KVM' among others. Since this bug is directly related to KVM functionality and involves an ioctl specific to KVM (KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG), it falls under the KVM category. +</think> + +The bug report discusses incorrect handling of the `KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG` ioctl call during migration, which relates specifically to the Kernel-based Virtual Machine (KVM) hypervisor. The issue is within the code that interacts with KVM's functionality, so the appropriate category is 'KVM'. + +**Step-by-Step Explanation:** + +1. **Identify Keywords:** The bug mentions "KVM_GET_DIRTY_LOG ioctl" and "migration," which are related to KVM. +2. **Understand the Context:** It involves an ioctl call specific to KVM, used during migration for dirty bitmap handling. +3. **Analyze the Issue:** The problem is in how errors from the ioctl call are handled within KVM's code. +4. **Map to Categories:** Since it's about KVM-specific functionality and error handling related to KVM ioctl calls, it fits under 'KVM'. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1297218 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1297218 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..396f976d5 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1297218 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's see. The bug report mentions that after live migration, the guest hangs and shows a message about the tsc (Time Stamp Counter) being unstable with a large delta of 662463064082 ns. This causes the guest to be unresponsive for several minutes. + +First, I need to understand what each category refers to. The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue here is related to the TSC during live migration. I recall that KVM uses the kvm-clock for guests, which should handle clock synchronization across migrations. But in this case, it's failing, leading to a significant jump in the TSC value and causing instability. + +Looking at the categories, 'KVM' seems directly relevant because the problem occurs within the virtual machine environment managed by KVM/QEMU. The issue is about how the clock is handled during migration, which is part of the hypervisor (KVM) functionality. Other categories like network or performance could be related, but the root cause points more to a KVM-specific problem with clock synchronization. + +So, the most appropriate category here is 'KVM'. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where guest VMs hang after live migration due to TSC instability, which is directly related to how the hypervisor (KVM) manages timekeeping during migrations. This points to a KVM-specific problem rather than other categories. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1312668 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1312668 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..eb68a62c3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1312668 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the report carefully. + +The user is having an issue with their VM rebooting immediately after migration when using certain CPU features, specifically the NX (No-Execute) feature. They mention that without the NX feature or when running on a 64-bit host, the problem doesn't occur. The logs from kvm-all.c show some activity related to KVM initialization and handling. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others. + +The problem is occurring during migration and specifically when using the NX feature. Since this relates to KVM's CPU features and migration functionality, it seems directly tied to how QEMU handles KVM-specific operations. The issue isn't related to translation errors or assembly lowering but rather to the behavior of the hypervisor itself during a specific operation. + +The logs also point to KVM-related functions like kvm_init_vcpu and kvm_cpu_exec, which reinforces that this is an issue with how KVM manages virtual CPUs during migration. + +Therefore, the most appropriate category here is 'KVM'. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1366836 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1366836 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..058adf098 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1366836 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU not booting Windows 8 properly on Core2Duo machines with certain kernels. The user mentioned that when using KVM with QEMU versions 1.7.0, 2.0.0, or 2.1.0 on a Core2Duo with kernel 3.4.67 or 3.10.12, the guest OS freezes during boot. However, it works fine when using an older kernel (2.6.32.12) or when running on an i3/i5 CPU. + +The user tried disabling networking and USB, which didn't help, so it's not a peripheral issue. They also changed the graphics card without success. The report suggests that the problem might be related to KVM/progressor incompatibility. + +Now, looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is specifically with KVM and the host's CPU architecture (Core2Duo vs i3/i5). Since KVM is involved and the problem seems related to how the hypervisor interacts with the hardware under different kernels, it points towards a KVM-related bug. The fact that it works on newer CPUs but not Core2 Duo suggests an issue in how KVM handles certain processor features or virtualization extensions. + +Therefore, the most fitting category here is "KVM." +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where QEMU with KVM fails to boot Windows 8 guests on Core2Duo machines running specific kernels (3.x), but works fine on i3/i5 CPUs or older kernels. The problem is suspected to be related to KVM/progressor incompatibility, which points directly to the hypervisor component. + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1378 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1378 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5d3f3fb63 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1378 @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification step by step. + +The user provided a detailed bug report where using iSCSI with QEMU leads to memory corruption and crashes. The key points mentioned include repeated messages about `TASK_SET_FULL`, followed by various error logs related to double free or corruption, and an assertion failure in block-backend.c. The user suspects the issue might be in `iscsi_co_generic_cb()`. + +Looking at the possible categories: the errors point towards memory issues (double free, corruption), which suggests a problem with how memory is being managed. This could relate to assembly lowering if it's a low-level issue or perhaps a bug in the hypervisor component since QEMU acts as one when using KVM. + +But considering the specific symptoms like double frees and assertion failures in block-backend.c, which handles I/O operations, this seems more related to memory management within QEMU itself rather than user-mode assembly. The hypervisor category might be broader but doesn't directly pinpoint the issue. + +However, another angle is that iSCSI involves networked storage, so maybe it's under the 'network' category. But the errors are about memory corruption, which is more of a kernel or low-level issue. + +Wait, the possible categories include 'hypervisor' and 'kernel'. Since QEMU includes KVM for virtualization and the crash is related to KVM (as seen in the error messages like `kvm: ...`), it's likely under 'KVM'. + +Alternatively, if the problem is within QEMU's handling of block devices or storage, maybe 'block' isn't listed, so perhaps 'hypervisor' is the closest fit. Or if it's a memory management issue in the kernel part of QEMU. + +But given that KVM is part of QEMU and the error messages reference kvm, the most direct category would be 'KVM'. +</think> + +The bug report describes crashes related to iSCSI handling leading to memory corruption, which affects QEMU when using KVM. The errors mention `kvm:` in their logs, indicating a problem within the KVM component of QEMU. + +**Step-by-Step Explanation:** +1. **Identify Keywords:** The error messages include "kvm:", pointing directly to KVM-related issues. +2. **Determine Category Relevance:** Among the categories, 'KVM' is specific to virtualization under QEMU. +3. **Conclusion:** The issue occurs within QEMU's KVM hypervisor component. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1438572 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1438572 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d6b6ad508 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1438572 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's break this down. The user is facing an issue with KVM in QEMU where it doesn't support KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY. They've tried different machines, one with RHEL 5.8 and kernel 2.6.18, the other with RHEL 5.9 but still getting the same error. + +First, I remember that KVM requires certain kernel capabilities to function properly. The error message suggests upgrading the kernel or using a newer kvm-kmod. Looking at their first setup, the kernel is 2.6.18-308, which is quite old, released in July 2012. The second machine has RHEL 5.9 but it's still Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5, which typically doesn't have the latest features. + +KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY was introduced in kernel version 2.6.29, as per the error message. So if their kernels are older than that, KVM won't support this capability. Upgrading to a newer kernel or using a compatible kvm module would resolve this. + +The user is also asking about QEMU compatibility with RHEL 5.9. Since Red Hat Enterprise Linux 5 reached end of life in 2014, it's unlikely that newer QEMU versions are supported on such old OSes. They might need to consider upgrading their OS to a more recent version for better compatibility and KVM support. + +So the main issue here is related to the kernel not supporting the required KVM capability because it's too old. The category should be 'KVM' as the problem lies within the hypervisor component. +</think> + +The bug report involves an error with KVM in QEMU, specifically related to the kernel not supporting KVM_CAP_USER_MEMORY and suggesting an upgrade to a newer kernel or kvm-kmod. This indicates that the issue is directly tied to the KVM functionality. + +**Answer:** + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1439 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1439 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..92ecd1574 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1439 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user provided a description where QEMU crashes with a segmentation fault when there's an "[accel]" section in the config file specifying type="kvm". + +First, I need to look at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue here is related to the "[accel]" section in the config file. The type specified is "kvm", so it's directly referencing KVM acceleration. Since QEMU is crashing when this configuration is used, especially under KVM, I'm leaning towards the 'KVM' category. + +I don't think it's a mistranslation or assembly issue because the problem arises from the config file setup, not from code translation errors. It's more about how QEMU handles the acceleration configuration during startup. + +Looking at other categories like network, device, etc., they don't seem relevant here since the crash is tied to KVM configuration specifically. Therefore, the most appropriate category is 'KVM'. +</think> + +The bug report involves a crash when using the KVM accelerator in the config file, so it's categorized under 'KVM'. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1487264 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1487264 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b7f1edb30 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1487264 @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories for QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully. + +The user is reporting that when using QEMU with KVM under Linux (specifically using virt-manager and libvirt), their Windows 8.1/10 VM crashes during an upgrade, leading to a SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED error. They mention they have to hard-shutdown the VM each time it happens. The issue occurs across multiple versions of QEMU from 2.1 to 2.3.x. + +Looking at the launch command, they're using a Q35 chipset in BIOS mode with various devices configured, including VirtIO components and spice for display. They also mention that using a workaround where they boot into a menu with a CD allows them to hard power off the VM and continue the upgrade successfully each time. + +The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +I need to determine which category this issue falls under. The problem seems related to how QEMU/KVM is handling the virtualization environment, particularly during a Windows upgrade process that causes an exception not being handled correctly. + +The user hasn't specified a specific component like networking or graphics, so it's less likely to be 'network' or 'graphic'. Since they're using KVM as the accelerator and the issue occurs in the VM's runtime (not during boot), 'KVM' is a possible category. However, the error seems to be about an exception not being handled by the system thread, which might relate more to how QEMU/KVM manages exceptions or handles guest OS crashes. + +Alternatively, the issue could be related to the hypervisor layer since KVM runs as a hypervisor under Linux. But 'hypervisor' is also a category. However, I'm leaning towards 'KVM' because the problem occurs within the KVM environment and involves handling of exceptions during VM operation. + +But wait, another angle: the crash happens when upgrading Windows, which could be related to how QEMU emulates certain hardware or devices. So maybe it's a device-related issue. The user mentioned using various devices like VirtIO and spice, so perhaps one of these is misbehaving. + +Alternatively, if it's an exception not being handled properly, that might point towards the kernel or hypervisor level handling of such exceptions. However, since KVM is part of the Linux kernel, but as a separate component, maybe 'KVM' is still appropriate. + +Wait, considering that the issue occurs during guest OS operations and relates to exception handling in the VM, it's more likely a problem within QEMU/KVM itself rather than device-specific issues. So I think 'KVM' is the right category here. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where Windows 10 crashes during upgrade when running under QEMU with KVM as the hypervisor. The crash occurs in the guest OS, leading to a SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED error. The user has to hard-shutdown the VM each time it happens. + +Possible categories include: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. + +The issue is occurring during the operation of the virtual machine under QEMU/KVM, and the problem seems related to how QEMU handles exceptions or crashes in the guest OS. Since KVM is used as the hypervisor/accelerator, and the issue involves handling of exceptions within the VM, the most appropriate category would be 'KVM'. + +Answer: KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1502934 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1502934 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..df4993e1e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1502934 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through the problem again. + +The user reports that QEMU doesn't start when KVM is enabled, specifically mentioning an issue related to SMM (probably System Management Mode). They noticed that after a certain commit where they added the SMM property, QEMU stopped working. The error message is about the guest not initializing the display yet. However, this only happens when using -enable-kvm. + +They mentioned that hardcoding pc_machine_is_smm_enabled() to always return false fixed the issue for them, but they don't fully understand what SMM does. They also provided the command line and system info, noting it works on their laptop but not the server. + +Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. The key here is that enabling KVM causes QEMU to fail with an SMM-related issue. Since the problem occurs when KVM is enabled and relates to SMM handling, it's likely under the 'KVM' category. + +The user tried the latest QEMU versions too, so it's not an outdated version causing it. The dmesg logs show some KVM warnings but nothing directly pointing to display issues. However, the main issue seems tied to KVM enabling and SMM handling within QEMU. + +So, putting it all together, this bug is related to KVM usage leading to a problem with SMM initialization in the guest, making 'KVM' the appropriate category. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1530246 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1530246 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..683bd67de --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1530246 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me read through it carefully. + +The user is talking about seeing a lot of kvm rdmsr error messages on the console, specifically in /dev/tty1. They tried using "echo 1 > /sys/module/kvm/parameters/ignore_msrs" but the messages still appear. The messages look like they're from QEMU's KVM hypervisor, mentioning vcpu0 and specific MSRs. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The user is dealing with messages related to KVM. They're trying to suppress these error logs, which are appearing on the console even after their attempt. The issue seems specific to how KVM handles logging in QEMU. + +The commands they used relate directly to the KVM module parameters, so it's definitely a KVM-related issue. The messages themselves mention 'kvm' and 'vcpu', further pointing towards KVM. + +I don't see any indication that this is about assembly or mistranslation; it's more about logging behavior in the hypervisor component of QEMU. So the most appropriate category here would be "KVM". +</think> + +The bug report is related to suppressing kvm rdmsr error messages, which are part of the KVM module and its interaction with virtual CPUs. The user tried adjusting a parameter but still faces the issue, indicating it's specific to how KVM logs these errors. Since the focus is on KVM behavior and logging suppression within QEMU, the category is: + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1534382 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1534382 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5bd96946a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1534382 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The user is reporting that when they use loadvm with a Windows 7 x86 guest under QEMU with KVM enabled and certain CPU configurations (like core2duo, Nehalem), the guest crashes after resuming from a save. The crash happens specifically when using more modern CPUs that support NX bit, but not when using default or other older CPUs. + +First, let's break down what the issue might be related to. The bug occurs during VM snapshot operations (savevm and loadvm). The problem seems tied to KVM since it's enabled. When resuming from a save, the guest crashes, which suggests something goes wrong in how QEMU/KVM handles the state restoration. + +Looking at the categories: + +- Mistranslation: This relates to incorrect mapping between source and target architectures. If there was an issue here, it might cause execution errors, but I'm not sure if that ties directly to the snapshot resume process. + +- KVM: Since the problem occurs when KVM is enabled and is specific to certain CPUs, this seems relevant. It's likely a hypervisor-related issue because KVM is the hypervisor in QEMU. + +Other categories like network or device might be involved if it were a hardware emulation issue, but the report doesn't mention any devices failing. Similarly, graphics issues aren't mentioned either. + +The fact that using certain CPUs causes the crash points towards how QEMU/KVM handles CPU features during state restoration. Maybe there's an incompatibility or incorrect handling of the NX bit or other CPU features when resuming from a snapshot. + +So putting it together, this seems like a hypervisor issue because KVM is the component managing the VMs and their states. The problem arises during loadvm, which is part of QEMU/KVM's hypervisor functions. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1536487 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1536487 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..568195cd5 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1536487 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The user is reporting an issue when migrating a KVM guest from QEMU 2.5.0 to 2.4.1. The error message mentions "fw_cfg" and a problem with the DMA interface that was added recently. They mention that this relates to a change in QEMU where fw_cfg gained a DMA interface, which might not be compatible across different versions. + +Looking at the categories, KVM is directly related since it's about virtual machines under KVM. The issue occurs during migration, which involves KVM and possibly device configurations. The error points to a specific device ('fw_cfg') within QEMU, suggesting it's a device-related problem, but since it's specifically KVM migration, the primary category would be KVM. + +I don't see any mention of assembly or mistranslation, so those are unlikely. The issue is not about graphics, sockets, network directly (though DMA could relate to networking, it's more tied to device configuration here). It's about compatibility during migration between QEMU versions affecting a specific device under KVM. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1541643 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1541643 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a5e889aec --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1541643 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's break down how I arrived at the category for this bug report. The user mentioned an issue with nested virtualization in QEMU using KVM. Specifically, they enabled kvm_intel with -enable-kvm and -cpu host but found that the IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR wasn't set correctly. + +First, I considered the possible categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. The mention of nested virtualization points towards KVM as the hypervisor involved. Nested virtualization is a feature that allows running a hypervisor inside another, which is handled by the KVM module in QEMU. + +The bug report references an MSR (Model Specific Register) not being set properly. MSRs are hardware registers used for various purposes, and their handling typically falls under low-level operations within the hypervisor or kernel modules like kvm_intel. Since this relates to how features are enabled at a very low level, it's directly tied to KVM functionality. + +I also noted that the user pointed out an old mailing list thread but corrected it with Intel documentation, indicating that the issue is about how QEMU (via KVM) initializes necessary hardware settings for VMXON. This means the problem lies in how KVM is configured or interacts with the host's CPU features. + +Given all this, the category most fitting is "KVM" because it's a feature and configuration issue within the KVM hypervisor implementation in QEMU. +</think> + +The bug report discusses an issue with nested virtualization where the IA32_FEATURE_CONTROL MSR isn't set correctly. This relates directly to how QEMU's KVM module handles CPU features and virtualization support. + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1596579 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1596579 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b3393e6e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1596579 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's see what this bug report is about. The user mentioned a segfault when rebooting their Windows VM. Segmentation fault usually points to some kind of memory issue in the program. + +Looking at the logs provided, there are several entries from VFIO and kvm. I know that VFIO is related to device passthrough, which the user mentioned they're using for their tape drive. The error about perf interrupt might not be directly relevant here but shows performance monitoring issues. + +The key line is [315765.858431] qemu-kvm[1385]: segfault at 0 ip (null). That's definitely a crash in the QEMU process. Since they're using PCI passthrough with an MPT SAS controller, the problem might be related to how QEMU handles this device during reboot. + +I recall that VFIO is used for device management in KVM. If there's a segfault upon reboot, it could be due to improper handling of the device state or resources when resetting the VM. The user also mentioned that two identical cards fail the same way, so it's likely an issue with how QEMU interacts with these controllers. + +Other error messages mention issues with the MPT base and SAS initialization. These seem like hardware-related problems but triggered by QEMU during reboot. Since the segfault happens in qemu-kvm, it points towards a kernel module or hypervisor issue rather than user-mode translation errors. + +So, considering all this, the bug is related to KVM's handling of the passthrough device, leading to a crash upon reboot. +</think> + +The bug report involves a segfault occurring during a reboot of a Windows VM using QEMU-KVM. The issue arises with an MPT SAS controller under VFIO-Passthrough setup, leading to kernel errors and failure in initializing the storage controller properly. The key here is that the segfault happens within the QEMU-KVM process, which suggests it's related to how the hypervisor handles the device during reboot or reset. + +Given the context of the error messages pointing towards KVM (kvm: zapping shadow pages for mmio generation wraparound) and VFIO (vfio-pci 0000:1a:00.0), this is likely a kernel module or hypervisor-related issue rather than a user-mode translation problem. + +Thus, the category is: + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1641 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1641 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e7ad57a18 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1641 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's break this down. The user is asking to classify a bug report from QEMU into specific categories like mistranslation, assembly lowering, etc. They provided the bug details and asked for just one word as the category. + +Looking at the bug report, the issue occurs when virtualizing Windows XP that tries to reboot. The crash happens in do_patch_instruction(), which is part of kvmvapic.c. KVM is involved here because it's a hypervisor technology used by QEMU for virtualization. + +The backtrace shows that the function do_patch_instruction is called from kvmvapic.c at line 439. This file is related to KVM acceleration, specifically handling the Virtual APIC (Advanced Power Management and Configuration Interface), which is part of KVM's functionality. + +Since the crash happens during the processing of queued CPU work in KVM, it's directly tied to the hypervisor component rather than other areas like network or graphics. The error seems to be within KVM's code, so the appropriate category would be 'KVM'. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1658141 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1658141 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1fd9f9176 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1658141 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let me read through the problem description carefully. + +The user reports that when running Wine's conformance tests on Windows 10 64-bit in QEMU, a BSOD occurs with "KMOD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED". They provided steps to reproduce and some logs. The issue happens only on Intel hosts, not AMD ones, and affects both QEMU versions 2.1 and 2.7, as well as different Linux kernels. + +Looking at the kernel logs, they saw messages related to KVM about unhandled rdmsr accesses. They also found a solution by adjusting kvm's ignore_msrs parameter, which suggests it's related to how KVM handles certain MSRs (Model-Specific Registers). + +The categories provided include 'KVM', among others. Since the problem is tied to KVM module messages and involves MSRs handled by KVM, this seems directly related to the hypervisor layer. +</think> + +The bug report mentions issues with KVM kernel module messages and adjusting KVM parameters to fix it. Therefore, it's categorized under: + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1661386 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1661386 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..21e168e02 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1661386 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm looking at this bug report and trying to classify it. The user provided an assertion error from QEMU when running in KVM mode. The error message is about the return value 'ret' not matching the expected number of MSRs in 'cpu->kvm_msr_buf->nmsrs'. + +The commit mentioned by the user was adding an assertion to check if KVM_GET_MSRS or SET_MSRS can handle all requested MSRs. This suggests that the bug is related to how QEMU interacts with the KVM hypervisor, specifically when dealing with MSR (Model Specific Register) operations. + +Looking at the possible categories: 'KVM' seems directly relevant here because it's an issue within the KVM acceleration code in QEMU. The error occurs in the kvm.c file, which is part of the KVM implementation. Other categories like 'assertion' or 'performance' don't fit as well. Since this is about MSRs and KVM handling, the appropriate category is 'KVM'. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1682128 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1682128 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9afe24559 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1682128 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report where a user is having trouble powering off a Solaris VM running on KVM. They mention that when they use 'poweroff' or 'init 5', the VM doesn't shut down properly and instead prompts them to press any key to reboot. However, this issue doesn't occur when using Xen. + +First, I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The main problem here is that the VM isn't shutting down correctly. The user specifically mentions KVM and Xen, so I'm thinking this relates to how the hypervisor handles certain operations. Since it works in Xen but not in KVM, it's likely an issue with KVM's implementation of power management for Solaris VMs. + +I don't think it's a mistranslation because that usually refers to incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, and this is more about system shutdown behavior. It's also not directly related to assembly or performance issues. + +The fact that it's specific to KVM points towards the hypervisor category. Hypervisors manage VM operations, including power states, so if Solaris can't shut down properly under KVM but works in Xen, there might be a problem with how KVM handles the poweroff command for Solaris guests. + +I don't see any mention of network issues or peripherals like graphics or sockets. It's also not about booting or VNC access. The issue is purely about shutting down the VM, which is a hypervisor function. + +So putting it all together, this bug is related to how KVM manages power states for Solaris VMs, making 'hypervisor' the appropriate category. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1686350 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1686350 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..3c6a60437 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1686350 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's see what the bug is about. + +The user mentioned that when they run QEMU with the '-cpu help' option, the list doesn't include a Skylake server CPU model. They're using KVM and the latest QEMU, so it seems like there's a missing entry in the available CPUs. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other. Since this is related to CPU models supported by QEMU's KVM, it falls under the 'KVM' category. + +I don't think it's 'other' because it's specifically about missing CPU support in KVM. It's not a translation issue or performance problem; it's an omission of a specific model. +</think> + +The bug report is about the absence of Skylake server CPU model in QEMU's '-cpu help' output when using KVM, which relates to the supported CPUs under KVM. + +**Step-by-step explanation:** +1. The user reports that the 'Skylake server cpu model' is missing from the list of available CPUs. +2. This pertains to QEMU's CPU support in KVM mode. +3. Therefore, it falls under the 'KVM' category. + +Answer: +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1687653 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1687653 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..258e7c144 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1687653 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify this bug report. The user provided a bug related to QEMU-KVM and detect_zeroes causing an unlimited number of threads on the host when the guest writes large chunks with big block sizes. + +Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is about QEMU-KVM misbehaving under certain conditions. It's related to how KVM handles I/O operations when detect_zeroes is enabled. This leads to a DoS on the host by creating too many threads, which suggests it's causing high CPU usage or system instability due to threading. + +The problem occurs during guest-side high I/O with big block sizes, indicating it's tied to storage or file handling. But since it's KVM that's starting too many threads, it's more about how the hypervisor (KVM) manages resources when certain options are enabled. + +It doesn't seem to be a translation issue (mistranslation) because it's not about converting code between architectures. It's also not about assembly lowering or performance per se, but rather an unexpected behavior leading to resource exhaustion in KVM. + +The categories that fit best would be either 'other' if it doesn't neatly fit into the others, or perhaps 'hypervisor' since it's directly related to KVM's operation and thread management. + +Since the bug is critical and involves KVM misbehaving under specific I/O conditions, the most accurate category seems to be 'hypervisor'. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1699567 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1699567 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9389faa89 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1699567 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is experiencing a crash when running their OS under KVM, specifically with an SSE instruction that's misaligned. They mention that in QEMU it works fine, but with KVM it crashes because of the #GP(0) error. + +The issue here seems related to how QEMU handles certain instructions or maybe the way it emulates things versus when running natively with KVM. The user points out that the problem is due to incorrect data alignment for SSE operations, which should be 16-byte aligned. They fixed it by adjusting their code, but they suggest that QEMU should enforce this alignment to catch such issues early. + +Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. The bug report is directly related to KVM usage because that's where it crashes. Even though QEMU emulates things, when using KVM (which provides hardware acceleration), the behavior might differ because it's more tied to the host CPU's actual execution. + +So, I think the category should be 'KVM' since the issue arises specifically under KVM and relates to how instructions are handled in that context. It's not about assembly translation or performance but rather about the hypervisor's handling of certain operations. +</think> + +The bug report discusses an issue where QEMU does not enforce SSE data alignment, leading to a crash when using KVM. This is specific to KVM usage and relates to how instructions are handled under hardware acceleration. + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1705717 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1705717 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..90534a548 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1705717 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU. The user provided a detailed scenario where live migration fails when using the 'host' CPU model with KVM nested=1. They mentioned that it works in other cases like using 'kvm64' instead. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, others, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. The issue specifically mentions KVM and a problem during migration when nested virtualization is enabled. So, this seems related to how KVM handles nested hypervisors or CPU models under certain conditions. + +The failure happens in target/i386/kvm.c at line +1629, which suggests it's within the QEMU/KVM code handling the x86 architecture. The problem occurs during live migration when the host CPU model is used with nested=1, leading to an assertion failure on the destination. + +The categories related to KVM are 'KVM' and possibly 'hypervisor', but since this is a specific issue within QEMU's KVM implementation, it's likely under the 'KVM' category. The other options don't fit as well because the bug isn't about device drivers or graphics; it's about how KVM handles nested configurations during migration. + +So, after considering all factors, the most appropriate classification is 'KVM'. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1707274 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1707274 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f245722a4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1707274 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report about QEMU segfaults. The user mentioned they're running version 2.9.0 on a server and after some hours, it crashes with segfaults. The command line provided shows they're using KVM acceleration. + +Looking at the possible categories: there's 'KVM' as one of them. Since the bug occurs in a KVM environment, and given that QEMU relies heavily on KVM for virtualization, this seems relevant. Segfaults could be due to issues in the hypervisor layer, which is what KVM is. + +Other options like 'device', 'graphic', or 'network' don't seem as fitting because the issue isn't specific to any particular device, graphics drivers, or network problems. The problem occurs during runtime, not during boot or VNC setup. Permissions and performance issues could be possibilities, but without more details pointing to those areas, KVM is a better fit. + +So I think 'KVM' is the right category here. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1721221 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1721221 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..32eba65cf --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1721221 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem carefully. + +The user is reporting an issue with PCIe passthrough of an Nvidia GTX 970 card to a Windows 10 guest using KVM in QEMU. The error message they're getting is "kvm_set_phys_mem: error registering slot: Invalid argument." This started happening after some recent changes in the KVM part of QEMU. + +First, I need to understand what each category means. The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The error message mentions "kvm_set_phys_mem," which suggests it's related to memory management in the KVM hypervisor. The specific error is about an invalid argument when trying to register a physical memory slot. This indicates that something is wrong with how the memory is being handled during the setup of the VM, particularly under KVM. + +Looking at the QEMU command line provided, I see they're using VFIO for device passthrough, which is common for GPUs and other high-performance devices. The device in question is an Nvidia card, so it's a PCIe device. However, the error occurs during the setup of physical memory, which might not directly be related to the device itself but rather how KVM is handling the memory allocation or mapping. + +The user also mentioned that this started failing after specific commits in QEMU's master branch related to KVM. That points towards changes in the hypervisor layer affecting this setup. The error could be due to incorrect handling of physical memory slots when passing through devices, possibly a regression introduced by those commits. + +So, considering all these factors: the error is about KVM and physical memory, it's happening after KVM-related changes, and it's during device passthrough (though the immediate issue is with memory registration). The most fitting category would be 'KVM' since that's where the problem originates from within QEMU. +</think> + +The bug report involves an error in KVM when handling physical memory during PCIe device passthrough. Since the issue stems from changes in the KVM code and relates to memory management under KVM, it falls under the 'KVM' category. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1722074 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1722074 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a0d0b96eb --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1722074 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the specified categories for QEMU. The possible categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The user provided a warning message: "warning: host doesn't support requested feature: CPUID.01H:ECX.vmx". They mentioned that they're using an AMD Ryzen 7 CPU and that the issue might be related to AMD not supporting something. + +I know that VMX is Intel's technology for hardware virtualization. Since the user is on an AMD processor, which uses SVM (AMD's equivalent), the warning makes sense because AMD doesn't support the VMX feature that Intel CPUs do. + +Looking at the categories, 'KVM' is related to kernel-based virtual machine and often involves CPU features like VMX or SVM. The issue here is about a missing host feature for virtualization, which ties into KVM's functionality since it relies on hardware support like VMX (Intel) or SVM (AMD). + +So, the category that fits this bug report is 'KVM'. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1732959 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1732959 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0c7e6ac5f --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1732959 @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully. + +The user describes a problem where after resuming a VM (step #4), the source VM's clock jumps by several seconds, proportional to the time since the last migration. They mention that bisecting the issue points to commit 108b249c453dd7132599ab6dc7e435a7036c193f, which introduces a function get_kvmclock_ns in KVM's x86 code. + +So, this seems related to the way KVM handles timekeeping. The commit removes get_kernel_ns and replaces it with ktime_get_boot_ns, affecting how kvmclock is implemented as a thin veneer over TSC. This could be causing the clock jump when resuming the VM after migration. + +Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Since this issue is tied to KVM's time functions and affects how the guest OS perceives time during resume, it falls under the 'KVM' category. +</think> + +The bug report discusses an issue with KVM's handling of kvmclock after resuming a VM, which directly relates to the hypervisor's timekeeping mechanism. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1769053 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1769053 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..36e5c7712 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1769053 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's tackle this classification task step by step. So, the user has provided a bug report related to QEMU and wants it classified into one of several categories. + +First, I'll read through the bug report carefully. The issue is about starting a KVM guest with more than 1TB of RAM failing. That immediately makes me think this relates to virtualization capabilities within QEMU, specifically KVM. + +The user mentioned they might need extra patches and provided a link to a discussion on the qemu-discuss list from 2017. Looking at that link (though I can't access it), but generally, issues with large RAM allocations often point to problems in how memory is handled by the hypervisor. + +Now, looking at the possible categories: KVM is one of them. Since the problem occurs when using KVM for virtualization and involves handling a significant amount of memory, which is a core functionality of the hypervisor (KVM), it fits under the 'KVM' category. + +Other categories like 'network', 'graphic', or 'device' don't seem relevant here because the issue isn't about network connectivity, display problems, or hardware device interaction. It's purely about the memory management in KVM guests. + +So, after considering all this, the most appropriate classification is definitely under 'KVM'. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1779162 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1779162 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..20ac181b7 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1779162 @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +Looking at the bug report, it mentions that during migration of larger guests on a z system (s390x), there's an error: "qemu-system-s390x: KVM_S390_SET_CMMA_BITS failed: Bad address". The issue causes data corruption in guest state. + +The fix is described as addressing storage attribute migration for non-small guests, which was failing due to out-of-bounds access leading to -EFAULT. The problem occurs when the index goes beyond buffer limits during migration. + +Since this involves KVM and relates to handling of memory attributes (CMMA bits) on s390x systems, it's specific to how QEMU interacts with KVM. The error is a kernel issue (Bad address), but since it's within the context of KVM and storage attributes, the primary category should be KVM. +</think> + +The bug report is related to an issue during migration in QEMU involving the s390x architecture and KVM. It specifically addresses problems with storage attribute migration for larger guests leading to kernel errors. The fix targets the KVM component, so it falls under the KVM category. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1785734 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1785734 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..098595806 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1785734 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through it carefully. + +The bug is titled "movdqu partial write at page boundary." The description mentions that in TCG mode, when a 16-byte write instruction like movdqu is executed at a page boundary and causes a page fault, a partial write occurs in the first page. They've provided an example code snippet where this issue happens. + +Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The issue involves a page fault during a write operation. Page faults are typically related to memory management and virtualization aspects. Since this is in QEMU, which includes a hypervisor (KVM) for hardware-assisted virtualization, the problem likely relates to how the hypervisor handles memory accesses. + +The movdqu instruction is an MMX/AVX instruction that writes 16 bytes. If it's crossing a page boundary and only part of it is written before a fault occurs, this indicates a problem in how QEMU emulates such operations when running under KVM or similar virtualization setups. + +So, considering the categories, 'KVM' seems to fit because it relates to the hypervisor's handling of memory during emulation. Alternatively, 'page fault' might fall under 'kernel' if it's about OS-level issues, but since this is within QEMU's TCG mode (a user-mode emulator), it's more about how the hypervisor manages guest memory. + +Therefore, the category for this bug is likely KVM. +</think> + +The bug relates to a page fault during a 16-byte write operation in QEMU's TCG mode under KVM. This involves the hypervisor handling of memory accesses. + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1788098 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1788098 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..5688a3575 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1788098 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's read through the information carefully. + +The user mentioned an issue with QEMU where enabling THP (Transparent Huge Pages) caused more frequent guest migration problems. They provided a kernel patch that fixes these issues by using the correct pagesize in kvm_unmap_radix(). The note mentions it's confirmed by IBM, so it's likely a valid fix. + +Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The problem is related to KVM and migration issues, which are tied to how the hypervisor handles memory during live migrations. The patch affects the kernel's handling of pages in KVM, specifically Book3S HV. This suggests it's a kernel-level issue within QEMU's KVM implementation. + +So the category should be 'KVM' because the bug is related to the KVM hypervisor and its interaction with the host kernel during guest migration. +</think> + +The issue relates to KVM and guest migration problems caused by a kernel patch, so the category is: + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1792193 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1792193 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f830c2830 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1792193 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The user upgraded from QEMU 2.12.0-2 to 3.0.0-1 and now can't load a VM when using "-cpu host". The VM works fine with the older version. They're running Arch Linux on the VM. The issue occurs whether they use "-cpu host" or "-cpu athlon". + +So, the problem is related to CPU configuration in QEMU after an upgrade. When using "-cpu host", it's supposed to use the host's CPU features for the guest. But with their AMD Athlon X2 processor, this causes GRUB to fail when trying to load the initial ramdisk. + +I know that KVM is involved because they're enabling it with "-enable-kvm". The issue seems to be in how QEMU/KVM handles the CPU configuration, especially for older processors like the Athlon X2. Maybe there's a regression in the newer version where certain CPUs aren't being emulated correctly. + +Looking at the categories: KVM is directly related since they're using it for virtualization. The problem isn't with translation, assembly, or graphics; it's more about how the CPU model is handled during VM startup, which ties into the hypervisor function provided by KVM. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1797262 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1797262 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7a4a2452c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1797262 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that after updating to RPi Kernel 1.20170427, QEMU can no longer boot the Raspberry Pi kernels. They provided kernel outputs showing issues with timing sources and serial port errors. + +Looking at the possible categories: it's related to the KVM hypervisor because QEMU-KVM is used for emulation. The problem seems to be with hardware timing, which is crucial for device emulation. So it's not a mistranslation or assembly issue but rather a problem in how devices are being emulated under KVM. + +The keywords here are "hypervisor" and "device," but since the primary function affected is QEMU-KVM's ability to emulate hardware correctly, the most fitting category would be "KVM." It points towards an issue within the hypervisor layer affecting device functionality. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1806040 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1806040 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..cb481f4f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1806040 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is experiencing an issue with QEMU related to Nested VMX virtualization and live migration not being supported. They mentioned that after updating QEMU from Git, they can't create snapshots due to this error. + +Looking at the provided categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc., I need to determine which one fits best. The error is about Nested VMX virtualization, which is a feature related to KVM hypervisor support in QEMU. KVM allows for full hardware-assisted virtualization and nested virtualization would be an extension of that. + +The user's setup uses the '-hypervisor' parameter with 'kvm=off', but they're still encountering issues. They found that a specific commit caused the problem, which likely modified how Nested VMX is handled in KVM. The error message directly points to a limitation in QEMU regarding live migration with nested VMX. + +So, considering all this, the most appropriate category here would be 'KVM' because it's related to the hypervisor functionality and virtualization features within that context. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1814 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1814 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..845963288 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1814 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +Let me read through the problem description carefully. The user is reporting that using `-M none` causes QEMU to fail on ARM64 platforms with a max IPA size less than 40 bits. They mention that KVM initialization fails because `virt_machine_class_init()` isn't called, which sets `mc->kvm_type`. This leads to the kernel defaulting to 40 bits, which isn't supported by some devices like Apple M1. + +The problem seems related to how QEMU initializes KVM on ARM64 when using `-M none`. The issue is that without calling `virt_machine_class_init()`, the necessary checks for IPA size aren't done. This affects systems where a larger IPA size (like 40 bits) isn't supported, causing failures. + +Looking at the steps to reproduce, they're comparing two commands: one with `-M none` and another with `-M virt`. The first doesn't set KVM parameters correctly, leading to failure on systems with limited IPA. This indicates a problem in how KVM is handled when the machine type is 'none'. + +Considering the categories, the issue directly relates to KVM setup and initialization. It's not about translations (mistranslation) or assembly code lowering. The specific mention of `KVM_CAP_ARM_VM_IPA_SIZE` points towards a KVM-related problem. + +So, the appropriate category here is definitely 'KVM'. This bug affects the proper configuration and initialization of KVM in QEMU when using certain machine types on ARM64 systems. +</think> + +The issue pertains to the initialization of KVM within QEMU, specifically when using `-M none` on ARM64 platforms. The problem arises because `virt_machine_class_init()` isn't called, leading to incorrect IPA size handling and subsequent KVM failures. This is a direct issue with how KVM is being set up. + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1836501 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1836501 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..06e24436c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1836501 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification step by step. The user provided a detailed issue where qemu-system-arm fails with an assertion error when KVM is enabled and the QEMU version is 2.6 or higher. + +First, I need to understand the error message: "cpu_address_space_init: Assertion `asidx == 0 || !kvm_enabled()' failed." This suggests that during initialization of the CPU address space, there's an assertion check that's failing because either the address space index (asidx) isn't zero or KVM isn't enabled. Since KVM is enabled in this case, asidx must be non-zero, which triggers the assertion. + +Looking at the user's environment: they're using an Odroid XU4 with Exynos hardware, running Debian Stretch or Buster. They noticed that without KVM, QEMU runs but is slow, and with KVM, it fails starting from version 2.6. They also mentioned that prior versions (like 2.1) worked fine. + +The link to the QEMU 2.6 changelog points out support for a separate EL3 address space, which likely introduced changes related to address space handling. The user suspects this feature is causing the issue because KVM is enabled, leading to the assertion failure. + +They provided dmesg output showing that KVM is initialized successfully, so it's not a hardware issue with KVM itself but rather how QEMU interacts with the hardware when KVM is active. + +The command line includes enabling KVM (-enable-kvm), so all signs point towards an interaction between KVM and the new address space feature in QEMU 2.6. + +Possible categories to consider are: KVM, as it's directly related; device or peripheral if it's a hardware device issue, but since KVM is part of the hypervisor layer, the problem seems more about how QEMU handles virtualization when KVM is enabled. + +Other categories like 'mistranslation' or 'assembly' don't seem relevant here. It's specifically about KVM interaction causing an assertion in address space initialization. + +Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is 'KVM'. +</think> + +The bug report involves QEMU failing with an assertion error when using KVM on a specific hardware setup after updating to version 2.6 or higher. The issue seems related to changes introduced in that version regarding EL3 address space support. Since the problem occurs only when KVM is enabled and is version-dependent, it's classified under 'KVM'. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1837851 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1837851 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a46bbaab7 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1837851 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's see what the problem is. + +The bug report mentions "hv-tlbflush malfunctions on Intel host CPUs with neither EPT nor VPID." So, it's related to KVM and hypercalls because hv-tlbflush is a hypercall used in KVM for TLB flush operations. The issue arises when the host CPU doesn't support EPT (Extended Page Tables) or VPID (Virtual Processor ID), which are features that Intel CPUs might have. + +The problem occurs on older Intel CPUs that support VT-x but lack EPT and VPID. Enabling hv-tlbflush causes bluescreens in the guest OS because KVM doesn't handle this scenario properly. It seems like KVM is not checking for both EPT and VPID availability before attempting to use hv-tlbflush, leading to issues when neither is present. + +Looking at the possible categories: Mistranslation, Assembly Lowering, Other, Device, Graphic, Socket, Network, KVM, Boot, VNC, Debug, Files, Permissions, Performance, Kernel, Peripherals, Hypervisor. + +Since this issue is directly related to how KVM handles hypercalls and TLB flush operations on Intel CPUs without certain virtualization extensions, it falls under the hypervisor category. The problem is within the hypervisor's handling of specific CPU features during VM operations. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1848244 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1848244 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..315b9d807 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1848244 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully. + +The user is trying to passthrough their Intel GPU using QEMU KVM with SandyBridge. They're encountering a crash during boot in Windows 7 and 10 with a bluescreen stop code 0x0000003b, which likely relates to the Intel GPU driver issues. + +They mention that removing "-enable-kvm" makes it work. So the problem is specifically when KVM acceleration is enabled. The system is an older ThinkPad T420 with an i5-2520M CPU and they're using vfio-pci for device passthrough. + +Possible categories include 'hypervisor' since KVM is a hypervisor, but in this case, the issue arises when enabling KVM (acceleration), which would fall under 'KVM'. Alternatively, it could be related to device passthrough under 'device', but the primary problem seems to be with how KVM interacts with the GPU. + +The crash happens during Windows boot while loading the Intel GPU driver. Since this is specific to the hypervisor's handling of GPU passthrough and occurs when enabling KVM, the category should likely be 'KVM'. It might also relate to device or graphics, but since it's tied directly to KVM functionality causing the issue, I'll go with 'KVM'. +</think> + +The bug report involves QEMU KVM crashing during boot when using GPU passthrough. The crash occurs specifically when enabling KVM (acceleration), indicating an issue related to how KVM handles device or GPU passthrough. Therefore, the category is: + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1848901 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1848901 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1da0e90fe --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1848901 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The error message says "kvm_mem_ioeventfd_add: error adding ioeventfd: No space left on device (28)". Hmm, I remember that in QEMU/KVM, ioeventfds are used for efficient I/O event handling, especially for devices like networking or storage. + +The error code 28 is ENOSPC, which stands for "No space left on device". This suggests that the system tried to add an ioeventfd but couldn't because there's no available space. So, this isn't related to user-mode issues like mistranslation or assembly problems. It's more about resource limits. + +Looking at the possible categories: KVM is definitely involved here since it's part of the error message. The other options like device, network, or peripherals could be related because they might use I/O events, but the specific mention of kvm_mem_ioeventfd_add points directly to a KVM issue. + +So, the category should be 'KVM' because the error is occurring within the KVM hypervisor's context when trying to manage I/O eventfds. +</think> + +The bug report indicates an error during the addition of an ioeventfd in QEMU's KVM hypervisor. The specific error code (28) points to a resource limit issue, which falls under KVM-related problems. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1850751 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1850751 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..865afd253 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1850751 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem again. + +The user reports that the KVM flag isn't exposed by default. They mention that according to the source code, it should be exposed when using an X86CPU model. However, they have to manually add "kvm=on" in QEMU's custom CPU arguments. Additionally, libvirt can't expose KVM because it assumes the flag is already available, only allowing "kvm hidden='true'". + +Looking at the possible categories: KVM is one of them. The issue revolves around how KVM flags are handled, specifically that they're not exposed by default when they should be under certain conditions. This relates directly to the KVM hypervisor functionality in QEMU. + +Other categories like 'mistranslation', 'assembly', or 'network' don't fit here because the problem isn't about instruction translation or network issues. It's more about how KVM features are managed and exposed, which falls under the KVM category. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1859310 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1859310 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6414492a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1859310 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through it carefully. + +The user is reporting an issue with libvirt probing failing when using KVM and 'none' machine type in QEMU. The error message mentions that an object isn't an instance of x86-machine. They provided a command line and some context about a commit that caused the problem by removing an object_dynamic_cast call. + +Looking at the categories, I see options like 'KVM', which seems relevant here because the issue is directly related to KVM usage. The error occurs in kvm_arch_init within target/i386/kvm.c, so it's definitely tied to the KVM part of QEMU. + +The other possibilities are device, graphic, socket, network, etc., but none seem as directly applicable as 'KVM'. So I think the correct category is KVM. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1862874 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1862874 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2fb3082b4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1862874 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I'm trying to classify this bug report in QEMU. The user provided a detailed description where running "java -version" in a guest VM causes the program to hang for a long time. They mentioned that Java gets stuck, and when they kill it with SIGSEGV, they see multiple threads blocked on futex waits. + +First, I need to look at the possible categories given: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug involves Java hanging in a VM when using "-cpu max" and running "java -version". The technical details point to issues with threads waiting on futexes, which are used for inter-thread communication. Futexes are part of the Linux kernel's synchronization primitives. So, if multiple threads are stuck waiting on futexes, it might indicate a problem with how QEMU is handling certain instructions or system calls, especially when running in a VM under KVM. + +Looking at the categories, "KVM" stands out because it's related to virtualization and hypervisors. The "-cpu max" option likely configures the CPU for maximum performance, which might interact differently with KVM. Alternatively, this could be a kernel issue, but since it's within QEMU, I think KVM is more relevant. + +Another angle: Java relies heavily on threading and synchronization, so any misbehavior in how the VM handles these could cause hangs. But without evidence of an assembly translation error (like wrong instructions being generated), "mistranslation" might not fit here. Instead, it's more about system calls or thread management within the hypervisor environment. + +So, considering all this, the issue is likely related to KVM, as that's where the VM's CPU and threading are handled at a low level. Therefore, I would classify this bug under "KVM". +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where running Java in a guest VM using QEMU with "-cpu max" causes hanging. The technical details indicate problems with futex waits, suggesting issues related to thread synchronization within the hypervisor environment. This points towards KVM as the relevant category. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1863819 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1863819 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..34e3509e3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1863819 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to classify this bug report. The user is experiencing crashes when using GDB to repeatedly single-step a userspace process in a KVM guest under QEMU. They mention that this happens specifically with Windows 7 x64 guests on an Ubuntu host and that it's reproducible across different QEMU versions. + +The key points are the use of KVM and the crash occurring during single-stepping with GDB. The exception is 0x80000004, which typically relates to a single-step trap in Windows. Since this behavior was present in older kernels but fixed in a newer one via a kernel commit, it suggests that the issue might be related to how KVM handles certain instructions or debug events. + +The user also notes that TCG guests hang instead of crashing, pointing towards an issue within QEMU's handling when KVM is enabled. Since the problem occurs across multiple QEMU versions and involves GDB interaction with a KVM guest, it seems like the bug is directly related to how KVM interacts with the virtualized environment during debugging. + +Looking at the possible categories, "KVM" stands out because the issue arises specifically under KVM mode. Other categories like "hypervisor" could also be relevant since KVM acts as a hypervisor, but "KVM" is more specific here. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where using GDB to repeatedly single-step in a userspace process within a KVM guest causes the guest application to crash with a 0x80000004 exception. This behavior occurs across multiple QEMU versions and affects Windows 7 x64 guests on Ubuntu hosts, with similar issues reported for other guests as well. The problem was previously causing hangs in older kernel versions but appears fixed by a specific kernel commit. Since the issue is observed when using KVM and not in TCG guests, it points to a problem within QEMU's handling of single-step events under KVM. + +The category that best fits this bug report is "KVM" since the crash occurs specifically when running under KVM mode, and the behavior is linked to how KVM interacts with the debugging process. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1866870 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1866870 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ad247dd45 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1866870 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's tackle this classification task. I need to figure out which category fits the given bug report from QEMU. The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug report mentions that after upgrading to Ubuntu 20.04, all KVM guests pause by default. Even when restarted via virsh, they remain paused, and the issue doesn't involve nested guests. The provided link has diagnostic info and a solution that's been integrated into updates. + +First, I note that the problem is related to KVM guests pausing post-upgrade. KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is part of the Linux kernel but managed by QEMU. Since the issue occurs after an OS upgrade, it might involve changes in how the hypervisor interacts with the system or user space tools. + +The category options include 'KVM' and 'hypervisor.' Since KVM itself is a hypervisor component, but sometimes issues are tracked under their management tools like QEMU. In this case, because the problem is about KVM guests not starting correctly after an upgrade, it's directly related to the KVM functionality provided by QEMU. + +Looking at other categories: 'hypervisor' is broader and might also fit, but since KVM is specifically mentioned, the more precise category would be 'KVM.' The bug isn't related to assembly or translation errors, nor does it fall under network, graphics, or performance issues. It's a specific behavior in KVM guests post-upgrade. + +So, considering all this, the most appropriate category for this bug report is 'KVM.' +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where KVM guests pause after an upgrade to Ubuntu 20.04. The problem directly relates to the behavior of KVM guests managed by QEMU, indicating a specific issue with how KVM handles these virtual machines post-upgrade. Since KVM is explicitly mentioned and it's part of the hypervisor functionality in QEMU, the category that best fits this bug report is **KVM**. + +Answer: KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1877052 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1877052 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..42ddcef64 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1877052 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully. + +The user is running a Windows 10 guest under KVM. After an apt upgrade on the host system (which updated the kernel), the VM pauses after a few seconds. This started happening after the kernel update, and it's persisting even after rebooting the host. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is related to KVM as the guest OS is running under it. The problem arises after a kernel upgrade on the host. So the pause might be due to changes in the host's kernel affecting the virtualization environment. It doesn't seem to be an assembly or translation issue since it's post-kernel update and affects the VM operation. + +Possible categories could be 'KVM' because that's the hypervisor being used, or maybe 'kernel' since it's a host kernel upgrade causing the problem. However, the primary issue is with KVM functionality breaking after the kernel update, so the most fitting category would be 'KVM'. + +Wait, but sometimes issues like this might fall under 'hypervisor' if they relate to the hypervisor layer. But in QEMU terms, KVM is the hypervisor itself on Linux. So classifying it under 'KVM' makes sense because that's the component handling the virtualization. + +Alternatively, if it were a problem with the host kernel affecting KVM, maybe 'kernel' would be appropriate, but since the issue is specifically about the VM pausing in KVM after the kernel update, I think 'KVM' is more accurate. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1877526 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1877526 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..1fe26fe31 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1877526 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report about QEMU. Let's read through it carefully. + +The user mentioned they're encountering a "KVM internal crash" with an error code of 1. They provided some assembly code and register information from the host machine. The issue occurs on RHEL 6.6 with QEMU version 0.12.1.2, but when they tested it on another machine with RHEL 7.5 and a newer QEMU version (1.5.3), it worked fine. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The error message clearly mentions "KVM internal error," which suggests that the problem is related to the KVM component of QEMU. The fact that it's an internal crash within KVM points directly to the hypervisor part since KVM functions as a hypervisor for virtualization in Linux. + +So, considering all this, the most fitting category from the list provided is "KVM." The issue isn't related to translation errors or assembly lowering but rather a failure within the KVM subsystem itself. +</think> + +The bug report describes an internal crash within KVM, which indicates a problem directly related to the hypervisor component of QEMU. + +Answer: KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1890069 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1890069 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2ee1c9feb --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1890069 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the provided categories. Let's read through the problem and see what's going on. + +The user is trying to run a QEMU VM with MIPS architecture using a specific command. They've set up multiple cores (12 cores) but when they start the VM, it uses all the CPU cores on the host and doesn't boot properly. Also, there are kernel logs indicating that the performance event sampling rate is being reduced multiple times because the interrupts are taking too long. + +Looking at the system details, they're using QEMU 4.2.0 on Ubuntu 20.04. + +Now, the possible categories include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, network, KVM, etc. + +The issue here is that when setting up multiple cores in the VM, the host's CPU usage becomes too high and the VM doesn't boot correctly. The logs are showing performance-related issues with interrupts taking too long. This seems to be a problem related to how QEMU handles CPU resources or scheduling when multiple vCPUs are involved. + +I know that KVM is part of QEMU for virtualization, and handling of multiple cores (vCPUs) is crucial there. If the VM isn't booting and all host CPUs are being used, it might be an issue with how QEMU's KVM hypervisor is managing the virtual cores or if the kernel in the VM isn't handling the CPU load correctly. + +The fact that the kernel logs show performance-related messages suggests that the problem might be in how the guest OS (running under QEMU/KVM) is handling its own CPU usage, but since the user is configuring multiple cores in QEMU, it's more likely an issue with how the hypervisor is allocating or scheduling resources. + +Therefore, the appropriate category here would be related to KVM, as that's the part of QEMU responsible for virtualization. So I'll classify this bug under "KVM". +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where QEMU uses all host CPU cores when running a MIPS VM with multiple cores and fails to boot properly. The kernel logs indicate performance issues due to interrupts taking too long, which might be related to how KVM handles vCPUs or resource allocation. + +**Answer:** + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1890290 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1890290 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8e5a7b1be --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1890290 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully. + +The error message says "KVM is too old to support ic-mode=dual,kernel-irqchip=on". That tells me it's related to KVM because the error mentions KVM directly. The user tried to boot a PowerPC L2 nested virt guest with certain parameters, and QEMU failed because the host's KVM version doesn't support those options. + +Looking at the possible categories: there's 'KVM' as one of them, which seems like the most direct fit since the issue is about KVM not supporting specific features. The other categories don't seem to apply here—like 'assembly' or 'network' aren't mentioned in the error. + +I should make sure there isn't a more specific category. 'Nested virt' might be under 'hypervisor', but the main problem is that KVM can't handle the parameters, so it's better categorized under 'KVM'. + +So, the classification is definitely 'KVM'. +</think> + +The bug report involves QEMU encountering an error where KVM is too old to support specific options. The error message clearly points to a KVM-related issue, making 'KVM' the appropriate category. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1894869 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1894869 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fb945f456 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1894869 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned an issue with Chelsio T4 NICs and provided some code changes they tried. + +The error message is about KVM reporting an invalid configuration related to MSIX PBA offset. Looking at the code change, it seems they're adjusting how vfio handles certain device IDs for Chelsio cards. The patch was meant to fix a similar issue on T5 NICs but didn't work for T4. + +The categories given are things like mistranslation, assembly, KVM, etc. Since this is related to KVM and involves device configuration in vfio/pci.c, it's likely under the 'KVM' category. The error occurs during VM setup with VFIO-PCI devices, which ties directly into KVM hypervisor functions. +</think> + +The bug report pertains to a hardware issue within the KVM hypervisor environment involving Chelsio T4 NICs and MSIX configuration. This falls under the 'KVM' category as it relates to device configuration in the KVM hypervisor. + +**Answer:** + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1912777 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1912777 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9f0611a2c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1912777 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The user provided a detailed analysis about an increase in KVM_EXIT_MMIO events when running tests on QEMU 4.0.0 compared to QEMU 2.11.0. They noticed that the number of these exits increased by around four times, leading to longer execution time—26 seconds versus 11 seconds. + +First, let me understand what KVM_EXIT_MMIO means. From what I know, MMIO stands for Memory Mapped Input/Output. It's a way for devices to communicate with the CPU. When virtualization is involved, like in QEMU/KVM, each access to such devices can generate an exit from the VM to the hypervisor (QEMU). So, KVM_EXIT_MMIO indicates that there was an MMIO operation that required the hypervisor's attention. + +The user observed that this specific type of exit increased significantly. They also saw that the total number of exits (KVM_RUN_EXIT) went up from about 399k in QEMU 2.11 to over 1.25 million in QEMU 4.0, which is a substantial jump. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue here is related to KVM exits, specifically MMIO. The user mentions that the increase in these exits caused a delay, which affects performance. So it's not about mistranslation or assembly issues but rather how QEMU handles VM operations, particularly I/O operations mapped through memory. + +So, considering the categories: + +- KVM is directly related to the hypervisor and virtual machine management. +- The bug report is about an increase in MMIO-related exits, which falls under the KVM's handling of device I/O. +- Performance is another category, but the root cause seems more tied to how QEMU/KVM manages VM exits rather than general performance issues. + +Therefore, the most appropriate category here would be "KVM" because it directly relates to the exit events managed by the hypervisor. The increase in MMIO exits suggests a change in how QEMU 4 handles these operations compared to earlier versions, leading to higher overhead and thus longer execution times. +</think> + +The bug report discusses an issue with KVM_EXIT_MMIO events increasing significantly between QEMU versions, affecting performance. This directly relates to the hypervisor's handling of MMIO operations, making "KVM" the appropriate category. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1914748 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1914748 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..259dd75ec --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1914748 @@ -0,0 +1,20 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm trying to figure out which category this bug report falls into from the given options. The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug report is about a confusing error message when KVM can't start the requested CPU. It mentions using specific CPU types like cortex-a57, a53, or a72 on a Cavium CN8890 with ThunderX cores. The user encountered an error: kvm_init_vcpu failed with "Invalid argument." + +The explanation from Peter Maydell clarifies that using a specific CPU type requires the host to exactly match that CPU; otherwise, using "-cpu host" or "-cpu max" is better. So the issue arises because QEMU is trying to use a CPU model that doesn't match the host's capabilities. + +Looking at the categories: KVM is directly mentioned in the error and context, so it's likely the right category. The problem isn't about assembly translation (assembly) or permissions/performance issues. It’s more about how QEMU interacts with the hypervisor (KVM), specifically when setting up the CPU model for virtual machines. + +Therefore, this bug report is related to KVM functionality. +</think> + +The issue pertains to the interaction between QEMU and the KVM hypervisor regarding CPU configuration. + +**KVM** + +The error occurs because QEMU attempts to use a specific CPU type that doesn't match the host's capabilities when using KVM acceleration. This falls under KVM-related issues as it involves how virtual CPUs are initialized in the KVM environment. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1914986 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1914986 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7c8e712de --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1914986 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is running QEMU with KVM acceleration and encountered an internal error related to OVMF and Audio. + +First, I notice the error message mentions "KVM internal error" which points towards something within the hypervisor or virtualization layer. Since KVM is part of the Linux kernel's hypervisor component, this might be a kernel module issue. + +The bug occurs when loading an audio driver from the OpenCore project in the UEFI shell. The user provided details about their setup, including specific QEMU command-line arguments. They mention that the crash happens during normal loading but works with the "-nc" switch, which suggests it's related to how devices are connected or initialized. + +Looking at the possible categories: KVM is one of them, so this seems directly relevant. The error message also specifically mentions AudioDxe.efi, indicating a problem with the audio driver within the virtual machine. However, since KVM handles device emulation, especially audio in this case, it's likely a hypervisor-related issue rather than just a peripherals problem. + +The stack trace shows an internal QEMU/KVM error, so it doesn't fit into categories like assembly lowering or mistranslation. It's more about how the hypervisor interacts with the guest OS and its devices. + +Therefore, the most appropriate category is "KVM." +</think> + +The bug report involves a crash during audio driver loading in a virtual machine under KVM/QEMU. The error message points to an internal KVM issue when interacting with the audio device. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1915 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1915 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..278534141 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1915 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's tackle this bug classification step by step. The user is encountering a blue screen when trying to install Windows 7 using QEMU. They mentioned that downgrading to version 5.0.2 resolved the issue for Windows 7 but didn't work for Windows 10. + +First, I need to identify what component of QEMU might be causing this problem. The issue occurs during installation, which suggests it's related to how the hypervisor or virtualization features are handling the guest OS. + +The user didn't mention any specific issues with network drivers, graphics, or sockets, so those categories don't seem relevant here. Instead, the blue screen is a common indicator of hardware compatibility issues in the virtual environment. + +Looking at QEMU's components, KVM (Kernel-Based Virtual Machine) is a hypervisor that allows QEMU to provide better performance and integration with Linux kernels. If the issue arises when using KVM, it might be a problem with how KVM is handling certain functionalities, especially if there were recent changes between versions 5.0.2 and the newer version being used. + +The user didn't specify any issues related to network configuration or device drivers explicitly, but the blue screen could still be linked to hardware emulation problems, which falls under the hypervisor's responsibilities. Since KVM is a key part of QEMU for virtualization, it makes sense to categorize this bug under "KVM." + +Additionally, performance-related issues might cause instability, but since the problem occurs during installation and not necessarily after, it points more towards a setup or compatibility issue rather than general performance. + +Overall, considering the context and the symptoms described, the most fitting category is "KVM." +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1919169 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1919169 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..aeae6d2f0 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1919169 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully. + +The user is reporting a startup crash when using an EFI-enabled VM with KVM acceleration. They provided the command line they used and the error message from the log. The error points to kvm-all.c:690, specifically an assertion failure in kvm_log_clear_one_slot regarding alignment of start and size with psize. + +Looking at the categories, I see options like 'device', 'graphic', 'network', 'KVM', etc. Since the issue is happening in accel/kvm/kvm-all.c and involves KVM-specific code (the error is from within the KVM module), it's clearly related to the KVM hypervisor. + +I don't think this falls under 'mistranslation' or 'assembly' because those are more about code translation or assembly lowering. It's not a general bug but specific to KVM functionality. Other categories like 'device', 'graphic', etc., don't fit here since it's not hardware-related but rather a software issue in the hypervisor layer. + +So, the category should be 'KVM' because the crash occurs within the KVM acceleration code. +</think> + +The bug report involves an assertion failure in the KVM module (kvm-all.c), which is part of QEMU's KVM acceleration. The error specifically relates to memory alignment during logging operations within the KVM context. Since this issue arises from KVM-specific code and affects the hypervisor layer, it falls under the 'KVM' category. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1921468 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1921468 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e0014f98b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/1921468 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The problem is about a KVM guest failing to find the zipl boot menu index when the "zIPL" magic value is at the end of a disk block. + +The user provided steps to reproduce and mentioned patches that were upstream. They also noted the current QEMU versions in Ubuntu. Looking at the categories, there's one specifically for 'KVM'. Since this issue pertains to KVM guests and their boot process involving zIPL, it fits under the KVM category. +</think> + +The bug is related to KVM guests failing during the boot process due to issues with the zipl boot menu index. The problem occurs in a KVM environment using virtio-blk and ECKD scheme. This directly relates to the hypervisor (KVM) functionality. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2041 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2041 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c550422f4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2041 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let's read through the problem description carefully. + +The user reported a build error when trying to build QEMU on Alpine Linux using RISC-V KVM. The error messages indicate undefined references to `strerrorname_np` in the `kvm.c` file. From the provided logs, it seems that during the build process, the linker can't find this function. + +I know that `strerrorname_np` is a GNU-specific and non-portable function, which might not be available on all systems, especially those using different C libraries like Alpine Linux's musl. The user also mentioned that other parts of QEMU use `strerror(errno)` instead, suggesting that the problematic code isn't consistent with how errors are handled elsewhere. + +Looking at the categories provided: the issue is related to KVM since it's happening in the RISC-V KVM target. There's no mention of user-mode assembly or semantic mapping issues, so 'mistranslation' doesn't fit here. The problem is during the build process, specifically a linker error due to an undefined function. This seems more like a compatibility issue with the system libraries rather than an issue with device drivers, graphics, sockets, etc. + +The category that best fits this situation is 'KVM' because it's directly related to the KVM target in QEMU and the build failure is within the KVM-related code. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2110 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2110 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..478d5764b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2110 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The problem is about live migrations failing in QEMU-KVM. + +Looking at the log messages, there's an error related to a missing section footer for 0000:00:01.3/piix4_pm and a load failure with "Invalid argument". This seems to be happening during the migration process between two identical hosts. + +The categories provided include 'KVM' as one of them. Since QEMU-KVM is involved, it's directly related to KVM. The issue occurs during live migration, which is handled by KVM in QEMU. + +Other categories like 'network' or 'device' might be relevant, but the primary context here is the KVM hypervisor failing during a migration. Therefore, the most appropriate category is 'KVM'. +</think> + +The bug report involves issues with live migration in QEMU-KVM, which directly relates to the KVM hypervisor's functionality. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2219 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2219 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..24e962580 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2219 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The report mentions "core dump instead of error when starting on nohz_full system with enable-membarrier." + +First, I need to understand the components involved here. QEMU is a versatile tool that can function as an emulator, virtualizer, and debugger. It's often used for running guest operating systems on different architectures. + +The bug report talks about a core dump happening instead of an error message when starting on a "nohz_full" system with "enable-membarrier." A core dump is when the system writes the contents of memory to a file upon a crash, which usually happens due to a segmentation fault or other severe errors. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. + +The mention of "nohz_full" suggests a real-time or low-latency setup, which might relate to scheduling in the host OS. The "enable-membarrier" seems to be related to memory barriers, possibly for synchronization between virtualized contexts or as part of KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) features. + +Since QEMU is involved with KVM when running as a hypervisor, any issues related to enabling specific features like membarriers could be under the KVM category. Alternatively, if it's about how the host kernel handles certain operations, it might fall under the kernel category. However, since this is within QEMU and relates to virtualization features, KVM seems more relevant. + +I don't see any direct mention of user-mode assembly or semantic mapping issues, so mistranslation doesn't fit. Similarly, graphics or network components aren't indicated here. + +So, considering that it's related to KVM's membarrier handling leading to a core dump during startup on a nohz_full system, the most appropriate category is likely "KVM." +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2247 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2247 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9cfbbfca0 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2247 @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I've got this bug report to classify for QEMU. Let's break it down step by step. + +The user is reporting an issue with `virsh qemu-monitor-command` where the help information for `watchdog_action` is missing the `inject-nmi` option. They mention that this feature was already supported in a specific commit, [795dc6e4](https://gitlab.com/qemu-project/qemu/-/commit/795dc6e46d953d70b4b7ddd3f4956f8f4b4d8565). + +First, I need to understand what the bug is about. The problem seems to be that when using `virsh` with `qemu-monitor-command`, the help information doesn't list `inject-nmi` as a valid action for `watchdog_action`. But according to the commit they referenced, this support was added. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is related to missing help information in `virsh`, which suggests a problem with command-line interface or documentation. However, the underlying support for `inject-nmi` was implemented, so it's more about the user interface not reflecting the available functionality. + +I don't see a direct category like "documentation" or "help", so I need to map this to one of the given options. Since the issue is about monitoring and management commands, `virsh` being a management tool for QEMU/KVM, it might fall under "KVM". Alternatively, since it's about command-line help, perhaps "other". + +But considering that the underlying feature relates to KVM (since watchdog actions are part of virtual machine management), but the issue is with the help information not reflecting the supported action. The main problem here isn't in the translation or performance; it's more about the documentation or CLI interface. + +Wait, another angle: `virsh` uses the HMP protocol (Human Monitor Protocol) which is part of QEMU's monitor. So the missing info might be a bug in the QEMU monitor's help output. This could be related to the monitor command implementation. + +Looking at the categories again, "other" seems too vague. Alternatively, perhaps it's an issue with device handling or peripherals, but I'm not sure. + +Wait, maybe it's about the management interface, which is KVM-related since `virsh` interacts with KVM/QEMU for virtual machines. So the category might be "KVM". + +Alternatively, considering that it's a missing help message, perhaps "other" is more appropriate because it doesn't fit neatly into any of the specific hardware or feature categories. + +But given that the issue arises from using `virsh` which interacts with KVM/QEMU, and the problem is about the availability of a command option in the monitor, I think "KVM" is the most fitting category among those provided. +</think> + +The bug report relates to missing help information in the QEMU/KVM management interface (`virsh`). Since it's about the CLI output for KVM-related commands, the appropriate category is: + +**KVM** + +Answer: KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2285 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2285 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c64a0c8f3 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2285 @@ -0,0 +1,22 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify the bug report "cross-i686-tci job intermittent timeouts" into one of the provided categories for QEMU. Let's break this down step by step. + +First, let me understand what each category means: + +- **mistranslation**: Issues where the translation from source architecture to IR or target is incorrect in user-mode. +- **assembly**: Problems during assembly lowering. +- **other**: Any bug that doesn't fit into other specific categories. +- **device**, **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, **KVM**, **boot**, **vnc**, **debug**, **files**, **permissions**, **performance**, **kernel**, **peripherals**, **hypervisor**: These are all specific areas or components within QEMU. + +The bug report mentions "cross-i686-tci job intermittent timeouts." I know that i686 refers to the Intel 686 architecture, and TCI stands for Translation Control Information, which is related to KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) in QEMU. So this seems to be about a specific issue with KVM or virtualization. + +The term "intermittent timeouts" suggests that jobs are timing out occasionally when running cross-architecture builds or tests involving i686 and TCI. This could relate to how the hypervisor (KVM) is handling the translation or processing, possibly leading to delays or failures in certain conditions. + +Looking at the categories, KVM is a direct match here since it's part of QEMU's virtualization components. The issue is likely within the KVM-related code that handles translations or scheduling for TCI. Other categories like "performance" might be close, but the specific mention of TCI ties it more directly to KVM. + +Therefore, the most appropriate category for this bug report is **KVM**. +</think> + +The bug report pertains to intermittent timeouts in a job involving cross-i686-tci, which relates to QEMU's KVM hypervisor. + +**Answer:** KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2339 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2339 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b3a1cf306 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2339 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user mentioned that a VM crash occurred when deploying Ubuntu 18.04 on a host running Ubuntu 24.04. + +First, looking at the possible categories: KVM is listed as one of them. Since the issue involves virtual machines and specifically KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine), which is part of the Linux kernel and used by QEMU for hypervisor functions, this seems relevant. + +The crash happened during deployment, which could be related to how the hypervisor handles the guest OS. Other categories like 'boot' or 'network' might also fit, but without more details pointing specifically to those areas (like boot issues or network errors), KVM is the most appropriate category here. + +So, I'll classify this under 'KVM'. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2363 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2363 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..4bbebe673 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2363 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The question is asking how to enable MBI support in QEMU when running in KVM mode. Let me break this down. + +First, QEMU is a versatile machine emulator and virtualizer that can run multiple operating systems under different hardware configurations. It has various modes, including user-mode and kernel-mode (KVM). KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which allows virtualization at near-native performance levels by leveraging the host's CPU virtualization extensions. + +The bug report is specifically about enabling MBI support in QEMU when using KVM mode. I'm not entirely sure what MBI refers to here—maybe it's related to the Minimum Boot Information or something else, but regardless, the key here is that it's a feature of QEMU and how it interacts with KVM. + +Looking at the possible categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The user is asking about enabling a specific feature (MBI support) in QEMU within KVM mode. Since the question is directly related to KVM usage and how features are implemented or configured under that mode, the most appropriate category would be 'KVM'. It's not a mistranslation issue because that pertains more to code translation errors. Neither does it fall into other categories like network, graphic, etc., since those relate to specific components rather than the virtualization mode itself. + +So, categorizing this under 'KVM' makes sense as it's about how QEMU handles features within its KVM environment. +</think> + +The bug report is asking about enabling a feature (MBI support) in QEMU when using KVM mode. Since KVM is one of the specific modes or components mentioned, the appropriate category is: + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2392 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2392 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..9616f730e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2392 @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Ability to use KVM on Windows" into one of the given categories. Let me see what each category means. + +First, let's look at the categories provided: + +1. **mistranslation**: Incorrect mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode. +2. **assembly**: Issues during assembly lowering. +3. **other**: Any bug that doesn't fit into other specific categories. +4. **device** +5. **graphic** +6. **socket** +7. **network** +8. **KVM**: Probably related to the Kernel-based Virtual Machine, a hypervisor in Linux. +9. **boot** +10. **vnc** +11. **debug** +12. **files** +13. **permissions** +14. **performance** +15. **kernel** +16. **peripherals** +17. **hypervisor** + +The bug report mentions "KVM on Windows." KVM is typically associated with Linux, as it's a hypervisor that runs on Linux kernels. The term "KVM" itself falls under the hypervisor category since it's used for virtualization. + +Now, the question is whether this is about using KVM specifically or another aspect of virtualization. Since the user is asking about KVM on Windows, and KVM is a hypervisor technology primarily for Linux, I need to see if there's an appropriate category here. + +Looking at the list, "KVM" is one of the categories, so even though it's being used in the context of Windows, which might be non-standard, the bug report is still about KVM functionality. Therefore, the most fitting category is "hypervisor," but since "KVM" is a specific hypervisor type listed as its own category, I think that's where it belongs. + +Wait, no. Let me double-check: The categories include both "hypervisor" and "KVM." But since KVM is part of the hypervisor family, maybe they are separate categories. Hmm, perhaps the bug is about enabling KVM on Windows, which might not be supported natively, so it's under the "hypervisor" category. + +Wait again. The user provided a list where "KVM" is a separate option. So if someone mentions using KVM specifically, even on another OS like Windows, then the category would be "KVM." Alternatively, maybe "hypervisor" is a broader category that includes KVM and others. + +But looking back at the categories given, I see both "hypervisor" and "KVM" listed as separate options. So if the bug is about using KVM on Windows, which might involve its own specific issues or features related to KVM's functionality, then it should be classified under "KVM." + +Alternatively, since Windows doesn't natively support KVM in the same way Linux does, this could be a feature request or bug related to adding KVM support to Windows, but perhaps that falls under the hypervisor category. + +Wait, I'm getting confused. Let me clarify: The categories are separate options, so if the bug is about KVM functionality regardless of OS, it's "KVM." If it's about virtualization in general on any platform, it might be "hypervisor." + +But the report specifically mentions "KVM," so perhaps it's best to go with "KVM" as the category. + +Wait no, I'm overcomplicating. The categories are listed separately, so if "KVM" is an option, then that's where it should go even if it's on Windows. So the answer is "KVM." +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2517 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2517 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..311ca3f42 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2517 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "destroying a vCPU will leak its AddressSpaces". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +First, let's understand the bug. It mentions vCPUs and leaking AddressSpaces. I know that in QEMU, vCPUs are virtual CPUs managed by the hypervisor. The leak here suggests a resource isn't being properly cleaned up when a vCPU is destroyed. + +Looking at the categories: + +- Mistranslation: This usually relates to incorrect mappings from source to target architecture. Doesn't fit here. +- Assembly: Lowering assembly code, probably not relevant. +- Other: A catch-all, but maybe not specific enough if another category fits. +- Device, Graphic, Socket, Network: These are hardware or peripheral components, but the issue is more about vCPUs and memory management. +- KVM: QEMU's hypervisor component. Since vCPUs are part of KVM, this seems relevant. +- Boot, VNC, Debug, Files, Permissions, Performance, Kernel, Peripherals, Hypervisor: Need to see if any fit better. + +The problem is about the hypervisor not releasing resources when a vCPU is destroyed. The AddressSpaces are memory structures associated with each vCPU. So it's directly related to how KVM manages virtual CPUs and their resources. Therefore, this bug falls under the KVM category. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2557 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2557 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6398cdbeb --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2557 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "balloon size startup parameter needed". The user has given me several categories to choose from, including device, graphic, other, etc. Let me think through each step carefully. + +First, I should understand what the bug is about. The term "balloon" in the context of QEMU usually refers to a balloon driver. In QEMU/KVM, the balloon driver is used for memory management on the host machine by adjusting the amount of memory allocated to the virtual machine dynamically. So, this seems related to how memory is handled during VM startup. + +The bug report mentions that a "startup parameter" is needed for the balloon size. This suggests that when starting up QEMU, there's no way to specify the initial size of the balloon. Without this parameter, users can't set it explicitly, which might cause issues if they need specific memory configurations right at startup or if the default isn't sufficient. + +Now, looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, other, etc., and knowing that KVM is one of them. Since the balloon driver is part of QEMU's KVM support for managing guest memory, this bug likely falls under the KVM category. The issue is about a missing parameter in the startup configuration, which relates to how QEMU/KVM initializes resources. + +I don't think it's 'device' because that would pertain more to hardware devices being emulated or connected. Graphic refers to display issues, which isn't the case here. It's not related to network, socket, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor (which is a higher level), or others like boot or assembly lowering. + +Therefore, the correct category should be KVM because it involves a parameter related to memory management in the virtual machine setup under QEMU's KVM environment. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2692 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2692 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b8e5ace54 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2692 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user is reporting that using the ldp instruction to access the I/O address space in KVM mode causes an exception. + +First, I need to understand each part of the problem. "Ldp" likely refers to a load double word pair instruction in assembly language, which is used to transfer data between memory and registers. The issue arises when this instruction is used to access the I/O address space within KVM mode. + +KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is a hypervisor that allows multiple operating systems to run on a single physical machine. It's a type 1 or bare-metal hypervisor. So any issues related to how KVM handles instructions would fall under its category. + +The problem occurs when the ldp instruction accesses I/O space. I/O address space typically refers to memory addresses used for input/output operations, which are often mapped by hardware devices or controllers. In virtualization environments, accessing these addresses needs to be carefully handled by the hypervisor to ensure proper emulation of hardware devices and prevent unauthorized access. + +Looking at the possible categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Since this issue is specifically about using an instruction in KVM mode that's causing an exception when accessing I/O space, it relates directly to how KVM handles I/O operations or possibly the translation of such instructions within the virtual environment. + +The bug report doesn't mention other areas like graphics drivers (graphic), networking (network), or file permissions (files). It's centered around KVM's handling of assembly instructions for I/O access. Therefore, the most appropriate category here is "KVM" because it pertains to how the hypervisor processes certain operations that lead to exceptions. +</think> + +The issue relates directly to KVM's handling of specific assembly instructions accessing I/O space, making the correct category: + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2837 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2837 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..49b031eae --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/2837 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "qcow2 corruption MinGW64". Let me break it down. + +First, Qcow2 is related to disk images in QEMU/KVM. So that points towards the 'KVM' category because KVM uses these image formats for virtual machines. + +The term "corruption" suggests an issue with how data is being handled, possibly during I/O operations. Since MinGW64 is a Windows port of GCC and is used to compile software on Windows, this might indicate a bug in the build environment affecting QEMU's handling of qcow2 files. + +Looking at possible categories: 'KVM' makes sense because it's about virtual machine images. There's also 'files' which relates to file operations, but I think KVM is more specific here since it's tied directly to the image format used by KVM. + +So, the main category should be 'KVM'. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/391879 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/391879 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2f4c06614 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/391879 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned a problem with KVM migration where the exit status is ignored. They used an example command in the monitor that writes the VM state to a file and then stops the VM even if the process fails. + +First, I'll look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug is related to KVM because the hint says 'kvm', and the command is using migrate exec in QEMU/KVM. The issue is that when the migration process (in this case, an exec command) fails, the VM stops instead of continuing. That sounds like a behavior specific to how KVM handles migrations. + +I don't think it's about network or socket because the problem isn't with communication but with handling the exit status after executing the command. It's not a performance issue, nor is it related to permissions or files directly, except that data was written to a file. + +Looking deeper, since the bug involves how KVM handles the exit status of an exec process during migration, it likely falls under how KVM manages its own processes and state transitions when migrating. So the category would be 'KVM'. +</think> + +The bug report discusses the behavior of QEMU/KVM's migrate command when using an executable (exec) that returns a non-zero exit status. The issue is that despite the failure (as indicated by the non-zero exit code), the VM is stopped, which might not be the intended behavior. + +Given the categories provided and the fact that the bug pertains to KVM functionality specifically, the appropriate category for this bug report is: + +**KVM** + +This classification is based on the binary package hint ('kvm') and the nature of the issue related to VM migration handling within QEMU/KVM. + +Answer: **KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/391880 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/391880 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e16bae791 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/391880 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug report mentions that when using "migrate exec:true" in the monitor, the VM hangs for several minutes. The user expects the VM to stop migrating after the pipe is closed. They also mention that backgrounding migration with -d doesn't help and suggest that the issue might be related to how data is written to the pipe or a timeout. + +First, I notice that the bug involves the 'migrate' command with an exec option, which is typically used in KVM for live migration. The problem seems to be related to how the migration process handles the closure of the pipe before all data is written. This could be an issue with how QEMU manages the migration process when using exec. + +Looking at the categories, 'KVM' seems directly relevant since it's about virtual machine management and migration, which are part of KVM functionality. The other categories like network or socket might be related to communication during migration, but the primary issue here is specific to the migrate command in KVM context. + +I don't think it's a mistranslation because that usually refers to incorrect semantic mapping between architectures. It's more about process management during migration. So 'KVM' fits best. +</think> + +The bug report pertains to the behavior of the `migrate exec:true` command within QEMU, specifically how the VM handles the closure of the pipe used for data transfer during migration. This is directly related to KVM functionality and migration processes. + +Answer: KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/490484 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/490484 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d1ea01d4a --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/490484 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report for QEMU. The user is running a 64-bit client on a 64-bit host with Intel, and they're encountering crashes when using KVM. The problem occurs when booting Windows 7 as a VM, which halts early with the error "kvm: unhandled exit 80000021" and "kvm_run returned -22". + +First, I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The mention of "kvm_run returned -22" and "unhandled exit 80000021" suggests that this is related to the KVM hypervisor. The error codes are specific to KVM operations, indicating a problem during VM execution. Since the issue arises when running a VM with KVM enabled, it's directly pointing towards a problem within the KVM component. + +Looking at the categories provided, "KVM" seems like the most fitting category here because the errors are explicitly from KVM and relate to its functionality. There's no mention of issues in translation or assembly lowering, so mistranslation or assembly wouldn't apply. It's not related to graphics, networking, or other components unless specified. + +So, the primary issue is within the KVM hypervisor itself, which handles virtualization on Linux systems. Therefore, the classification should be under "KVM". +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/497273 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/497273 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..00b458060 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/497273 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's see. The user is reporting a bug with QEMU where Windows XP 64 fails to install when using KVM in version rc2. They provided detailed information about the host setup, including Fedora 11 and specific KVM modules. + +The steps they took involve building QEMU from a particular commit and running it with certain parameters. The guest OS hangs during installation after reverting a specific commit related to cpuid and multicore setup on Intel CPUs. When they revert that commit, the problem goes away. + +Looking at the categories provided, I need to classify this bug. It's happening in QEMU with KVM involved, so "KVM" is definitely relevant. The issue arises after a specific code change, suggesting it's related to how QEMU handles certain CPU features or virtualization specifics. + +The other possible categories like network, graphic, etc., don't seem to fit here since the problem isn't about networking or graphics but rather installation failure with KVM involved. So the primary category should be "KVM." +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/506 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/506 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e13b7a86d --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/506 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug report is about "auto-discover virtio port using sysfs." Let me break this down. + +First, I know that VirtIO is a virtualization technology used for efficient communication between a virtual machine (VM) and the host. It's part of the KVM hypervisor stack. The VirtIO ports are typically used for devices like network interfaces or block storage in VMs. + +The term "sysfs" refers to a Linux kernel filesystem that exports kernel data as files, allowing user-space programs to access system information. In this context, using sysfs suggests that QEMU is trying to automatically detect VirtIO ports by reading from the sysfs structure. + +Looking at the possible categories: Mistranslation, assembly, KVM, and others like device, graphic, socket, etc. The mention of VirtIO points towards a hypervisor-related issue since KVM is a hypervisor. Additionally, auto-discovering ports might be part of how QEMU interacts with the host's hardware resources via sysfs, which ties into the hypervisor's responsibilities in managing virtual devices. + +I don't think it's related to assembly or mistranslation because those would pertain more to code translation issues. It's not about graphics or networking specifically unless it's a network device, but the report doesn't specify that. The key here is the use of sysfs for VirtIO discovery, which is part of KVM's functionality. + +So, putting it all together, this bug relates to how QEMU/KVM interacts with the host system via sysfs to manage virtual devices, which falls under the hypervisor category. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/521202 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/521202 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..7ea13cfe9 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/521202 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report from QEMU. Let me read through it carefully. + +The user reports that Windows XP x64 and 2008 Server x64 don't work on 32-bit hosts when using QEMU versions above 0.9.0. They mentioned that version 0.9.0 works, but newer ones like 0.9.1, 0.11, and 0.12 have the issue. + +The problem occurs during installation or runtime. The installer hangs at a specific step, and when trying to run a converted VirtualBox image, it fails during ACPI table loading in safe mode. Without ACPI, Windows refuses to run. + +They tested on different hosts: an Athlon XP (32-bit) and a Core2 Duo running in 32-bit mode with KVM disabled. Enabling KVM causes Windows to detect a 32-bit CPU and fail. + +Looking at the possible categories: + +- **mistranslation**: This relates to incorrect mapping from source to target, but I don't see any mention of user-mode assembly or translation issues here. +- **assembly**: No direct reference to assembly lowering problems. +- **KVM**: The user mentions testing with KVM disabled and enabled, so this is relevant. But the main issue seems related to CPU detection and ACPI. +- **boot**: The bug affects booting as installation hangs during setup. +- **graphic**, **network**, etc.: Not mentioned. + +The key points are about running 64-bit guests on 32-bit hosts, which involves CPU mode and virtualization. KVM is a part of QEMU for hardware-assisted virtualization. Since the issue arises when using newer QEMU versions that might have changed how KVM or CPU detection works, it's likely related to KVM. + +However, another angle is boot issues due to ACPI problems. But since enabling KVM affects the detection and causes failure, I think KVM is the main category here. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/563 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/563 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..abeb14c96 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/563 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's see. The user wants me to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug report mentions "KVM ubuntu 20 VPS on Ryzen 9 5950X". So the key word here is KVM. KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is a virtualization technology that allows running multiple guest operating systems on a host machine. It's integrated into the Linux kernel and provides full hardware acceleration. + +Looking at the categories, there's an explicit 'KVM' category listed. Since the bug report specifically points out issues with KVM on Ubuntu 20, it's clear that the problem is related to how KVM functions or interacts with the system. This could be anything from performance issues, boot problems, or hardware compatibility. + +The mention of "VPS" probably refers to a Virtual Private Server, which suggests this might be an issue within a virtualized environment managed by KVM. However, without more specific details about the bug symptoms (like crashes, performance degradation, etc.), I can't narrow it down further. But based on the category options provided, 'KVM' is the most straightforward classification here. + +I should make sure that none of the other categories could also apply. Since the report doesn't mention graphics issues, network problems, or hypervisor specifics beyond KVM, sticking with 'KVM' makes sense. +</think> + +The bug report mentions "KVM", which stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine. This is a virtualization technology integrated into the Linux kernel. Therefore, the category that best fits this bug report is: + +**KVM** +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/568445 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/568445 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f4685ff06 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/568445 @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user mentioned it's part of QEMU and provided possible categories like mistranslation, assembly, device, etc. + +Looking at the bug report, the issue is about KVM guests using LVM-backed drives experiencing high iowait times due to caching settings. The reporter suggests that defaulting cache to 'none' improves performance. They also reference some URLs which likely discuss this problem in QEMU/KVM context. + +The categories related here are 'KVM' since it's directly about the hypervisor, and possibly 'performance' because it affects system performance. However, the main focus is on KVM configuration, so I think 'KVM' is more appropriate. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/584516 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/584516 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..8ed8ae277 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/584516 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned that their OpenSUSE guest VM hangs after live migration when using clocksource=kvm-clock, but it works fine when they set it to acpi_pm. They provided a backtrace showing where the problem occurs in the QEMU code. + +Looking at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is related to live migration and clocksource settings. Since it's hanging during VM operation after migration, and changing the clocksource affects this, it points towards a timing or synchronization problem. The function kvm_run in qemu-kvm.c suggests that it's part of the KVM module. + +So, the category should be 'KVM' because the bug is related to how QEMU interacts with the hypervisor (KVM) during live migration and timekeeping. +</think> + +The bug report involves issues with live migration under QEMU/KVM when using a specific clocksource setting. The problem occurs in the KVM module's interaction, particularly around timing or synchronization during migration. + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/599574 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/599574 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..a9eb51f30 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/599574 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The user mentioned that when using the "-no-reboot" option with KVM in version 12.x, QEMU doesn't do anything and exits immediately without any output or error. However, when they add "--no-kvm", it works as expected. This issue doesn't occur in versions 11.0 and 11.1. + +First, I'll look at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The bug is related to the "-no-reboot" option not working as intended when used with KVM. Since it works fine without KVM (using "--no-kvm"), the problem seems specific to how QEMU handles KVM in this context. The issue isn't about assembly translation or performance; rather, it's a misbehavior of an option related to the hypervisor. + +I remember that "-no-reboot" is supposed to prevent the virtual machine from rebooting after a crash. If it's broken with KVM, it points towards an issue in how QEMU interacts with the KVM hypervisor. The user tested multiple 12.x versions and saw consistent failure, which suggests it's a regression or a bug introduced in that version. + +Looking at the categories, "KVM" seems directly relevant here because the problem occurs when using KVM. Other options like boot, vnc, etc., don't seem to fit as this is specifically about KVM behavior with an option. +</think> + +The issue pertains to how QEMU interacts with KVM when using a specific option, indicating a problem within the KVM hypervisor context. + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/608 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/608 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..e583ca899 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/608 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned that it's part of QEMU and provided several categories to choose from. + +The error is related to incremental live backup and an invalid "bitmap-mode". I know that in QEMU/KVM, bitmap modes are used for efficient disk backups by tracking changes incrementally. So when someone tries to do a backup with an invalid bitmap mode, it's likely causing an issue during the backup process. + +Looking at the categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Since this involves live backup and relates to how QEMU handles storage or disk operations, especially under KVM, I think "KVM" is a relevant category. However, it could also be related to "hypervisor" since KVM is a hypervisor. + +Wait, but the bug report mentions an error prompt when doing incremental backup with invalid bitmap-mode. This seems more about how QEMU handles the backup process itself, which might be part of its own management rather than the hypervisor's core functions. Alternatively, it could be a problem in how KVM interacts with storage during backups. + +I'm considering whether "hypervisor" is the right category or if it falls under another like "files" (since it's about backup) or "permissions". But I think hypervisor makes more sense because it's related to the virtualization layer handling the backup, which is a KVM feature. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/642304 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/642304 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f1cb10c55 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/642304 @@ -0,0 +1,15 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I have to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The bug is about Solaris/x86 v10 hanging under KVM in QEMU. Let me think through this step by step. + +First, the user provided a list of possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue is that when running Solaris/x86 10 as a guest under QEMU with the -enable-kvm option, it hangs. Without this option, it works fine. So the problem specifically occurs when KVM acceleration is enabled. + +Looking at the categories, "KVM" seems like the most direct fit because the issue arises when using KVM in QEMU. The hang happens only under KVM mode, which suggests that there's a problem related to how KVM is being used or configured in this setup. + +I don't think it's any of the other categories like network or graphic because those would imply issues with networking or graphical output, which aren't mentioned here. It's more about the hypervisor aspect since KVM functions as a hypervisor for virtualization. + +Therefore, the appropriate category is KVM. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/643430 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/643430 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0fb46b104 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/643430 @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +<think> +Alright, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The issue is about system_powerdown not working in QEMU-KVM when running FreeBSD guests. + +First, the user mentions that enabling KVM causes the problem. Without KVM, it works fine. So it's related to KVM being enabled. + +Looking at the categories provided: There's a specific category for "KVM." Since this issue only occurs when KVM is active, it makes sense that the problem lies within the KVM hypervisor component of QEMU. + +Other possibilities like device or network don't seem to fit here because the issue isn't with hardware devices or networking. It's more about how the virtualization layer (KVM) handles system commands. + +Therefore, the correct category for this bug is "KVM." +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where `system_powerdown` does not function correctly when using QEMU-KVM with FreeBSD guests. The problem arises specifically when KVM acceleration is enabled, as evidenced by the fact that disabling KVM (`--no-kvm`) allows the command to work as expected. + +Given this context and the provided categories: + +- **mistranslation**: This category pertains to issues in mapping source architecture to IR or target architectures. The problem here doesn't seem related to such a semantic mapping issue. + +- **assembly**: This would relate to assembly-level code issues during lowering, which isn't mentioned in the bug report. + +- **other**: A catch-all category, but we have more specific options available. + +- **device**, **graphic**, **socket**, **network**, **hypervisor** (which is KVM), and others are listed. However, since the issue specifically mentions KVM being enabled or disabled, and the behavior changes accordingly, this points directly to a problem within the KVM hypervisor component of QEMU. + +Thus, the most appropriate category for this bug report is: + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/741887 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/741887 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..fd6560c7e --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/741887 @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user mentioned that using `virsh snapshot-create` is too slow, taking about four minutes instead of a few seconds. They provided details about the environment and observed behavior with iotop showing two kvm processes handling disk IO. + +First, I'll look at the categories given: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others. + +The bug is about snapshot creation being slow, which relates to how efficiently QEMU/KVM handles the process of saving a machine's state. The user mentioned that `savevm` (a QEMU command) behaves similarly, indicating it's not just a libvirt issue but something deeper in the hypervisor or virtualization layer. + +Looking at the possible categories, "KVM" is directly related since they're using KVM as their hypervisor. The slowness could be due to how KVM manages disk I/O during snapshots, possibly involving the way QEMU interacts with the underlying hardware or storage. Since this affects performance during a critical operation like snapshotting, it's not about assembly lowering or user-mode issues but rather the hypervisor's handling. + +Other options like "network" or "performance" are possible too, but since KVM is the primary component involved here, and the issue is tied to its functionality when taking snapshots, the most fitting category would be "KVM". +</think> + +The bug report deals with slow performance of `virsh snapshot-create` in a KVM environment. The issue seems to stem from how QEMU handles disk I/O during the snapshot process, which is directly related to KVM's hypervisor functionality. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/744856 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/744856 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..0e13a70bd --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/744856 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The user mentioned that they can't boot their machine when using more than 6 disks since QEMU-KVM version 0.13. They tried up to 14 drives and encountered an error where there's no bootable disk. + +Looking at the possible categories, I see options like 'device', 'network', 'KVM', etc. The issue here is about passing multiple disks to the guest, which relates to how QEMU handles disk devices. Since it's related to the number of disks and booting problems, this points towards a device-related problem, specifically with disk handling in KVM. + +The user tested both with and without VirtIO, so it's not limited to any specific I/O driver. The core issue is that beyond 6 disks, the machine fails to recognize a bootable disk, which suggests a limitation or bug in how QEMU manages multiple devices during the boot process. Therefore, this should fall under the 'KVM' category as it pertains to virtual machine configuration and device handling within KVM. +</think> + +The issue is related to passing more than 6 disks to a guest in QEMU-KVM, which affects the booting process. This falls under the 'KVM' category since it's about managing devices (disks) in a KVM virtual machine. + +**Answer:** + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/747583 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/747583 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..f0820eb35 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/747583 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Alright, I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report related to QEMU. The user provided a detailed report about an issue with the time zone settings when using KVM under QEMU. + +The problem is that after stopping and starting the guest OS (Windows 2008), the timezone setting changes unexpectedly from PDT to EDT, even though the host is set to EDT. However, if they sync the time using Internet Time or reboot without exiting KVM, the issue doesn't occur. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The issue revolves around time synchronization and timezone settings when starting/stopping the guest. Since it's related to how QEMU/KVM handles time configuration, especially during start/stop/reboot, I think this falls under the KVM category because it's about virtualization behavior. Alternatively, it could be 'other' if it doesn't fit into a specific hardware-related category. + +However, since the problem is about time zones and the interaction between host and guest, which can be tied to how the hypervisor (KVM) handles system time and timezone settings during VM lifecycle events like start/stop. So, I think KVM is the most appropriate category. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/797905 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/797905 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..adff33837 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/797905 @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's see. The user is having trouble with a virsh live migration command in QEMU. They're using Ubuntu Server 10.04 x64 and tried to migrate the VM with ID 19 to another KVM host at 10.1.5.1. + +The error message they received says: "unable to set user and group to '116:127' on '/var/lib/libvirt/images/teste.img': No such file or directory". Also, it mentions that 'teste.img' has root ownership (root:root with xrw permissions). + +Hmm, the error is about not finding 'teste.img'. That suggests that the source image isn't located where virsh expects it to be. Maybe the path is incorrect or the image doesn't exist at all. + +Wait, but the user says 10.1.5.1 is a functional KVM host. So perhaps the issue is with the permissions when setting up the migration. The error mentions trying to set user and group '116:127', which might be incorrect or mismatched between the source and destination. + +I remember that live migration in libvirt requires certain conditions, like both hypervisors being properly configured, shared storage, and correct permissions on the image files so that the destination can access them. Maybe the user didn't set up the storage correctly or there's a permission issue despite the root ownership. + +Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Since this is about live migration and permissions on image files during that process, it's related to how QEMU/KVM handles the migration, especially with file access. + +The error message points to a problem setting user and group for the image file, so it's likely a permissions or file existence issue during the KVM migration process. That fits under 'KVM' category because it's directly related to the hypervisor's operation during live migration. +</think> + +The bug report is about an issue with live migration in QEMU/KVM where the system cannot set user and group permissions on the image file, indicating a problem related to KVM functionality. + +**Category: KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/808 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/808 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..30326d8a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/808 @@ -0,0 +1,24 @@ +<think> +Alright, so I've got this bug report to classify. The user is having issues with QEMU crashing when using virtio-scsi in Windows guests. Let me go through the details step by step. + +First, the problem occurs when loading the virtio-scsi drivers during the installation of Windows. The steps provided are pretty clear: they set up a VM with the necessary options, including the VirtIO SCSI driver ISO. When trying to install the driver, the VM aborts and crashes. They also mention that this happens even with existing VMs that were previously working fine. + +Looking at the error message: `qemu-system-x86_64: ../accel/kvm/kvm-all.c:1760: kvm_irqchip_commit_routes: Assertion 'ret == 0' failed.` This seems like a KVM-specific issue since it's pointing to kvm-all.c. The assertion failure likely indicates that something went wrong when trying to commit the IRQ routes, which are part of how virtual devices communicate with the hypervisor. + +Now, categorizing this bug report based on the given options: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The crash is happening in the kvm module (kvm-all.c), so it's related to the KVM accelerator. The issue isn't about translation between architectures or assembly lowering, so mistranslation and assembly are out. It also doesn't seem to be a graphics or network problem. Since it's directly causing QEMU to abort during VM setup, especially when dealing with device drivers, I'm leaning towards 'device' as the category. + +But wait, KVM is the hypervisor here, and since the error is in kvm-all.c, maybe it's more aligned with the hypervisor itself. However, 'hypervisor' isn't an option provided. Alternatively, 'device' might still be appropriate because it's about a VirtIO SCSI device causing issues. + +Another angle: the problem occurs when interacting with the VirtIO driver during installation, which is a hardware device simulation. The failure in IRQ routes could be due to improper handling of device interrupts by KVM. So perhaps it's under 'device' or maybe 'peripherals'. + +But considering that KVM is part of the hypervisor layer and the error message points directly to KVM code, it might make more sense to classify this under 'KVM'. However, I'm a bit confused because 'hypervisor' isn't listed as an option. The closest would be 'other', but that's too vague. + +Wait, looking back at the options: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Since the issue is with VirtIO-scsi, which is a device emulation provided by QEMU for use under KVM, and the crash happens in KVM code, I think 'KVM' is the right category here. +</think> + +The bug occurs when using the virtio-scsi driver under KVM, leading to an assertion failure within the KVM module of QEMU. The error message points directly to a problem within the kvm-all.c file, which is part of the KVM hypervisor implementation in QEMU. Therefore, this issue falls under the 'KVM' category as it pertains to the interaction between the virtual device and the KVM accelerator. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/823733 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/823733 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..d4130148c --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/823733 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I have this bug report about QEMU where Solaris VMs can't be powered off using ACPI shutdown or poweroff. The user tried several things but couldn't get it to work. They mentioned that on their physical machine and VMware, it works fine, which makes me think the issue is specific to how KVM handles something. + +Looking at the possible categories, I see 'KVM' as one option. Since the problem occurs with KVM-based VMs, this seems relevant. The user suspects an ACPI issue in KVM because when they disabled ACPI on their physical machine, similar behavior happened. Also, they tried modifying the GRUB config without success, which points towards a deeper configuration or handling issue. + +The bug report mentions that the VM reboots endlessly when trying to power off, prompting for any key. This suggests that the shutdown process isn't being handled correctly by KVM's ACPI implementation. Since KVM is involved and the problem relates to how the guest OS handles shutdown commands, it likely falls under a specific category. + +Other categories like 'network' or 'graphic' don't seem to apply here because the issue is about power management. 'Device' might be too broad unless it's a hardware-specific problem, but the user didn't mention any device issues. + +So, putting it all together, the problem is related to KVM's handling of ACPI during shutdown, making 'KVM' the most appropriate category. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where Solaris VMs running under QEMU/KVM cannot be powered off using ACPI shutdown or the poweroff command. The user observes that the VM enters a reboot loop, prompting for any key to reboot. This behavior is specific to KVM and does not occur on physical machines or VMware. The user suspects an issue with how KVM handles ACPI. + +Given the information provided, the most appropriate category for this bug report is **KVM**. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/855800 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/855800 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..2e915a8de --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/855800 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the information carefully. + +The user mentioned that KVM crashes when attempting to restart migration. They provided a detailed sequence of steps leading to the crash: starting two KVM systems, connecting to the monitor, migrating, checking info, canceling migration, restarting migration, and then the crash occurs with an assertion failure in block-migration.c. + +Looking at the categories, I see "KVM" as one of them. Since the issue is directly related to KVM crashing during a migration process, which is a feature specific to KVM's management within QEMU, this seems like the most fitting category. + +Other possible categories like "network" or "device" might be involved because migration involves network communication and device handling, but the core issue here is that KVM itself is crashing. Therefore, categorizing it under "KVM" makes sense as it directly points to a problem within the KVM component during its operation. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where KVM crashes during a migration restart. The key point is the crash happening in the KVM process when handling the migration procedure, which falls under KVM's specific functionality. + +**KVM** \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/899961 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/899961 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..6b05a4bb6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/899961 @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. Let's start by reading the problem carefully. + +The user is reporting that QEMU/KVM locks up when running a 32-bit userspace with a 64-bit kernel on x86 systems. They mention it happens with both QEMU and QEMU-KVM version 1.0, but not in older versions like 0.15. The issue occurs specifically when the kernel is 64-bit and the userspace is 32-bit. It doesn't happen for all guests, but a particular case with a 32-bit Windows 7 guest consistently causes the problem. + +When this happens, Windows detects a new CPU and prompts to reboot. After hitting "Reboot," the system locks up with 100% CPU usage, making it unresponsive except for being killable via -9. + +Now, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation relates to incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, which could be relevant here since it's a mix of 32-bit and 64-bit environments. But I'm not sure if that's the exact issue. Alternatively, KVM is involved because the problem occurs with QEMU-KVM. + +The bug report points towards an interaction between the 32-bit guest OS (Windows 7) and the 64-bit host kernel in QEMU/KVM. This seems like a hypervisor-related issue since KVM is a hypervisor that allows running guests under the host OS. Therefore, the problem might be in how KVM/QEMU handles the combination of 32-bit userspace on a 64-bit kernel. + +So, considering the categories, "KVM" seems to fit because it's specifically about the hypervisor component causing the lock-up when certain configurations are used. The issue isn't related to assembly or translation errors but rather to how KVM manages the virtual environment. +</think> + +The bug report describes a problem where QEMU/KVM locks up when running a 32-bit userspace with a 64-bit kernel. This is specific to the hypervisor component, so the category is: + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/920772 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/920772 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..c20b8842b --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/920772 @@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ +<think> +Okay, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU with Windows 98 SE under RHEL6.2/CentOS6.2. The user mentioned two main issues. + +The first issue is that when running in KVM mode, the screen goes black just after the installer finishes and switches to Win98. This suggests a problem related to virtualization or the hypervisor. Since KVM stands for Kernel-based Virtual Machine, which is part of the hypervisor layer, this category seems relevant. + +The second issue is about BIOS Plug-and-Play drivers not working in QEMU mode, leading to devices like CDROM and network driver not being recognized. However, since they ran it successfully in QEMU mode, maybe it's more related to device emulation or peripherals. But the first issue specifically points to KVM. + +So considering both issues, but especially the first one which directly mentions KVM failure, I think the correct category is 'KVM'. +</think> + +The bug report involves issues when running Windows 98 SE under QEMU in KVM mode and non-KVM mode. The primary issue occurs in KVM mode where the screen goes black after installation. This points to a problem with the hypervisor, which is handled by KVM. While there are device-related issues in QEMU mode, the main focus is on KVM's failure. + +**KVM** + +The correct category for this bug report is **KVM**. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/921208 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/921208 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..367f9a7b6 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/921208 @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +<think> +Okay, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user is having an issue where the Win7/x64 installer hangs with a 0x0000005d error, which is the "unsupported_processor" Blue Screen of Death (BSOD). They mention that adding '-machine accel=kvm' helps it boot, implying that without KVM acceleration, the problem occurs. + +So first, I need to understand what each category means. The categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The user is using QEMU and when they add the KVM acceleration flag, it works. So without KVM, there's a problem during the installation of Windows 7 on x64. The BSOD mentions an unsupported processor, which might be because the virtualization isn't handling certain CPU features correctly, leading to Windows thinking the processor is unsupported. + +Looking at the possible categories, 'KVM' seems relevant because the issue is tied to whether KVM acceleration is used. Since without KVM, the installation fails with a BSOD related to processor support, it's likely a problem in how QEMU handles virtualization when using KVM. Alternatively, maybe it's an issue with the hypervisor (since KVM is a hypervisor), but since 'KVM' is a specific category and more directly tied to the acceleration flag used, I think 'KVM' is the right category. + +Other possibilities: 'hypervisor' could also be a fit because KVM is a hypervisor, but in this case, the user specifically mentioned using '-machine accel=kvm', so it's more about how KVM is being utilized or configured in QEMU. So I think 'KVM' is the appropriate category here. +</think> + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/922355 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/922355 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ec1328f67 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/922355 @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the information carefully. + +The user is running QEMU on a Pandaboard and it's crashing when they invoke it. The output shows an error related to KVM initialization: "Could not initialize KVM, will disable KVM support." Then there's a crash in the TCG code at line 848 of tcg-target.c. + +Looking at the possible categories: + +- mistranslation +- assembly +- other +- device +- graphic +- socket +- network +- KVM +- boot +- vnc +- debug +- files +- permissions +- performance +- kernel +- peripherals +- hypervisor + +The error message directly mentions KVM, so that seems relevant. QEMU has a KVM accelerator for virtualization, and the error is about not being able to initialize it. The crash happens in the TCG code, which is part of QEMU's translation layer when running without hardware acceleration. + +Since the issue is specifically with KVM initialization failing, leading to a hypervisor-related problem, the most appropriate category seems to be "KVM." It's a specific issue related to the hypervisor component. +</think> + +The bug report mentions an issue with KVM initialization and a crash in QEMU's TCG code. Since KVM is a key component for virtualization acceleration, this falls under the hypervisor category. + +**Answer:** +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/945 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/945 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..b7ac609ec --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/945 @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's tackle this bug report classification step by step. + +First, I read the problem description. The user is encountering an error when using the nbd-server-add command in QEMU 7.0.0-rc1 with a qcow2 image that has an iothread in migration context. The error message is: `kvm: ../block.c:3657: bdrv_open_child: Assertion `qemu_in_main_thread()' failed.` and the process aborts. + +Looking at the steps to reproduce, they create a qcow2 image, start QEMU, then issue nbd-server-start and nbd-server-add commands. The error occurs during these NBD server operations. + +The categories provided include things like mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. + +I know that QEMU has multiple components: the user-mode emulator, the hypervisor (KVM), block devices, networking, etc. The error message mentions `kvm` and `block.c`, which points to KVM-related code in the block layer. + +The assertion failure is about `qemu_in_main_thread()`. This suggests that some part of QEMU's block device code is being called outside the main thread when it shouldn't be, possibly due to a threading issue during migration with iothreads. + +NBD (Network Block Device) server operations involve network and block I/O. If an iothread is involved, perhaps there's a race condition or incorrect handling in the KVM context. + +Looking at the error message, since it's related to KVM and block device opening in the wrong thread context, this seems like a problem within the hypervisor layer rather than user-mode emulation or other components. + +So, considering all this, the category should be 'KVM' because it involves kernel modules and block I/O in the context of KVM virtualization. +</think> + +The bug is related to the KVM module's handling during NBD server operations, specifically an assertion failure due to threading issues. This points to a problem within the hypervisor layer. + +Answer: KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/977391 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/977391 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..ac9c883ec --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/977391 @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I have to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's see what the bug is about. + +The user mentioned a "soft lockup - CPU#8 stuck for 61s! [kvm:*]" and that their KVM machine hung suddenly. The proc version shows it's related to Ubuntu with a specific kernel version, but the key point is the mention of KVM in the error message. + +Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. Since the bug involves KVM and the error is specifically tied to it, the category should be KVM. +</think> + +The bug report mentions a soft lockup related to KVM, so the category is: + +KVM \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/992067 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/992067 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..38afc2fa2 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/KVM/992067 @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +<think> +Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user is having issues with Windows 2008R2 guests being very slow during cold boot when they have more than 4GB of memory. They mentioned that the KVM process starts small but gradually increases its memory usage and causes the guest to blue screen. After some time, it recovers but has performance issues initially. + +Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other. + +The problem seems to revolve around the boot process and memory allocation in KVM. The user tried various configurations without success, suggesting it's not an issue with device drivers or graphics but rather something related to how KVM handles large amounts of memory during guest OS startup. + +The blue screen error about a clock interrupt might be related to issues during the hypervisor's handling of CPU resources, especially under heavy load. Since this is happening during the initial boot and improves once the system recovers, it points more towards a boot-time issue specific to KVM guests with large memory. + +I don't think it's 'performance' because that usually refers to ongoing slowness rather than issues during startup. 'Hypervisor' could be relevant since KVM is a hypervisor, but the primary issue seems tied to the boot process and resource allocation, which might fall under 'KVM'. + +Wait, but there's a category for 'boot' as well. The problem occurs during the cold boot of the guest OS. So maybe it's better classified under 'boot'. However, since KVM is involved in managing resources and the error seems to occur within the hypervisor environment, perhaps 'KVM' is more precise. + +Alternatively, the issue could be related to how memory is being handled during the initial stages of the guest's boot process. If this is a problem with KVM's handling of large memory allocations, then 'KVM' would be appropriate. But if it's specifically about the boot process failing, then 'boot' might be better. + +The user also mentioned that after some time, the guest recovers and runs fine, which suggests that the issue isn't with ongoing performance but rather the initial setup phase. So, considering all factors, I think 'KVM' is the most fitting category because it's directly related to how the hypervisor manages resources during guest boot. +</think> + +The bug report describes an issue where a Windows 2008R2 guest in KVM experiences slow cold boots and blue screens when allocated more than 4GB of memory. The problem occurs during the initial boot process, with the KVM process gradually increasing its memory usage until it reaches the allocated amount, leading to performance issues and errors. + +Key points: +- Occurs during guest OS boot. +- Related to large memory allocations in KVM. +- Affects the hypervisor's handling of resources during startup. + +The most fitting category is 'KVM' because the issue pertains to how the hypervisor manages memory and resources during the initial boot phase of the guest operating system, leading to performance problems specific to KVM environments. + +**Answer: KVM** \ No newline at end of file |