add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1777232 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1777232
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..348ab8611
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/device/1777232
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's break down this bug report to classify it correctly under QEMU. The user provided a list of categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about NVME failing on big writes. Specifically, when the compliance test 8:3.3.0 runs and tries to write large chunks of data, it fails when the device is backed by a file. The problem arises with how PRP lists are handled in QEMU's SGList, leading to posix pwritev failing due to too many vectors.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'device' seems relevant because NVME relates to storage devices. However, since the failure happens in data transfer handling (related to I/O operations), another possible category is 'network', but that's more about communication between systems. Alternatively, it could be classified under 'peripherals' as it involves device drivers and their interaction with the host system.
+
+But wait, considering that the issue is specifically with how QEMU handles I/O vectors for writes, which relates to storage operations and device emulation. Therefore, 'device' might not be the best fit because it's more about the storage handling rather than the device itself. Alternatively, 'peripherals' could include storage devices as peripherals.
+
+However, in QEMU terminology, the NVME is a block device driver, so maybe it falls under 'block'. But since 'block' isn't an option here, looking back at the list, the closest categories are 'device', 'network', or 'other'.
+
+Wait, another angle: the issue occurs when mapping PRP lists into QEMUSGList and using pwritev which fails due to too many vectors. This is a performance-related problem because it's about handling large writes efficiently. But 'performance' is also an option.
+
+But the primary issue is related to how data transfers are being handled by the device driver, so perhaps 'device' or 'peripherals'. Since 'peripherals' includes storage devices like NVME controllers, that might be a more accurate category.
+
+Wait, but looking at the options again: 'files', 'permissions', 'performance', etc. Maybe it's better to think about where this bug is manifesting. The problem occurs in QEMU's handling of data transfers for the NVME device, so it's likely under the 'device' category as it pertains to how the device (NVME) interacts with the host.
+
+But considering that it's an I/O vector issue which relates more to the storage and file operations rather than the device itself, perhaps 'files' isn't right. Alternatively, since the problem is about how many vectors are used, leading to pwritev failure, this is a limitation in the handling of large writes, so maybe 'performance' because it's affecting write performance.
+
+Wait, but the user specifically mentioned that the issue arises when using posix pwritev and the number of vectors exceeds the maximum. This suggests an I/O operation limitation, which might be more related to how QEMU is structuring the I/O requests rather than performance in terms of speed.
+
+Another thought: 'kernel' could be involved since it's dealing with system calls (pwritev), but that's a broader category. Alternatively, maybe 'hypervisor' if it relates to KVM, but the issue isn't directly about virtualization features but rather I/O handling.
+
+Hmm, perhaps the best fit is 'device' because the bug report is about the NVME device failing during writes, which is a block device operation. So 'device' seems appropriate.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses an issue with QEMU's handling of large writes for the NVME device, specifically involving PRP lists and I/O vector limitations. This points to a problem in how the storage device interacts with the host system during data transfers, which falls under the 'device' category.
+
+**Answer:** device
\ No newline at end of file