add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 33 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1672365 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1672365
deleted file mode 100644
index 06be6f854..000000000
--- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/1672365
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
-<think>
-Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me read through it carefully.
-
-The user mentioned a "nested 9pfs read fail." Hmm, 9pfs refers to the 9P protocol used by QEMU's VirtioFS or virtfs. So there's an issue with file reading over this filesystem.
-
-They're running two nested QEMU VMs: one for Test and another for Nginx. Both are using VirtioFS mappings. The problem occurs when the inner VM (probably the Test one) can't read from the 9pfs during boot, leading to a kernel panic in the guest OS. After that, the outer QEMU process uses 100% CPU.
-
-Looking at the setup details, they're using VirtioFS with security_model=none and mount_tag for different paths. The host has /nix/store as a Btrfs on LVM with OverlayFS, which might be related to how files are being accessed.
-
-The key points from the bug report: 
-- Init fails because it can't read from virtfs.
-- Kernel panic occurs, but QEMU still consumes 100% CPU in the outer VM.
-
-Since this involves VirtioFS setup and filesystem operations failing during boot, which is part of QEMU's functionality. The performance hit (100% CPU) suggests something isn't handled correctly in QEMU when a kernel panic occurs, possibly related to how it handles nested VMs or VirtioFS failures.
-
-Looking at the categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, etc. This seems more about filesystem handling within QEMU's VirtioFS support, which falls under 'filesystem' operations. Alternatively, since it's a nested setup and involves VirtioFS, it might be classified as a hypervisor issue, but I'm not sure.
-
-Wait, the categories given don't include 'filesystem,' but there's 'files.' So maybe that's where it fits. But also, since it affects performance (100% CPU), perhaps it's under 'performance' or 'kernel.'
-
-But looking again, the problem arises from VirtioFS failing during boot, leading to kernel panic and high CPU usage. Since this is a QEMU bug related to how VirtioFS is handled in nested VMs, it might fall under 'hypervisor.' Alternatively, since the issue is with VirtioFS setup, which is part of device emulation, maybe 'device.'
-
-Wait, no, the categories are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
-
-The failure occurs during boot, so that's a boot issue. But the bug is in QEMU's handling of VirtioFS, which is part of the hypervisor or device layer.
-
-Hmm, but 'boot' category might be more about the guest OS boot process, not necessarily the underlying cause. Since it's related to filesystem access via VirtioFS, maybe 'files' is appropriate. Alternatively, considering that the QEMU process isn't handling the kernel panic correctly and using 100% CPU, perhaps it's a performance issue.
-
-But I'm not entirely sure. Maybe 'hypervisor' because it's about nested VMs and how QEMU manages VirtioFS in such setups.
-</think>
-
-The bug report involves issues with VirtioFS (9pfs) during boot, leading to kernel panic and high CPU usage. Since this relates to QEMU's hypervisor function managing nested VMs and filesystem access, the category is:
-
-hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file