add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 15 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2545 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2545
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..54b1b7a7c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2545
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user provided a bug report related to QEMU and HAXM with an error message about the accelerator 'hax' being invalid.
+
+First, I look at the error message: "qemu-system-x86_64.exe: -accel hax: invalid accelerator hax." This suggests that when trying to use the 'hax' accelerator, QEMU is throwing an error saying it's not valid. 
+
+I know that in QEMU, accelerators like HAXM are used for hardware acceleration, particularly on Windows. So this seems related to how QEMU interacts with hypervisors or virtualization extensions.
+
+Looking at the possible categories provided: hypervisor, kernel, device, network, etc. The 'hax' accelerator is part of the HAXM (Hardware-Assisted Virtualization for Mac), which is a hypervisor. So this error relates to how QEMU is handling hypervisor acceleration.
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation because that's more about code generation from source to IR. It's not an assembly issue either since the problem isn't with assembly lowering. Other categories like network, graphic, or socket don't seem relevant here. The error is specifically about an invalid accelerator, which ties directly to hypervisor support in QEMU.
+
+Therefore, the appropriate category for this bug report is 'hypervisor' because it's related to the use of HAXM as a hardware-assisted virtualization accelerator within QEMU.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file