add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 0 insertions, 67 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2830 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2830
deleted file mode 100644
index 36ec73a73..000000000
--- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/2830
+++ /dev/null
@@ -1,67 +0,0 @@
-<think>
-Okay, so I need to classify this bug report from QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug is about "gdbstub: breakpoint/watchpoint increments warp timer on single-core icount mode, breaking determinism." 
-
-First, let me break down the terms here. GDBStub is part of QEMU used for debugging. Breakpoints and watchpoints are features in debuggers that pause execution when certain conditions are met.
-
-The issue mentions that these breakpoints/watchpoints cause an increment in the "warp timer" which affects determinism. Determinism here likely refers to the behavior being predictable, so any unexpected change could lead to non-deterministic behavior in the virtual machine.
-
-Looking at the categories provided: translation (mistranslation), assembly lowering (assembly), and others like device, graphic, network, KVM, etc. 
-
-GDBStub is related to debugging functionality, but determinism in this context seems linked to how QEMU manages the execution timing or state, especially in single-core mode with instruction counting. This could tie into the hypervisor's management of virtual time or scheduling.
-
-But wait, GDBStub is part of the user-mode components, handling debug connections. However, the impact on determinism suggests it affects how the emulator runs the guest OS. Since KVM is a hypervisor, and this issue might relate to how breakpoints affect timing in a single-core setup with KVM's involvement.
-
-Alternatively, if it's about the way QEMU's execution model (like icount) interacts with GDBStub's operations, that could be under 'translation' or 'hypervisor' categories. But since the primary effect is on determinism during debugging sessions, maybe it's more related to how the hypervisor handles state changes.
-
-I'm a bit torn between 'mistranslation' and 'hypervisor'. The bug report doesn't seem to involve incorrect translation but rather an unintended side effect of using breakpoints in single-core mode. So perhaps it's not about translation errors but about the interaction between debugging features and the virtual machine's timing, which is handled by the hypervisor.
-
-Alternatively, since GDBStub is part of QEMU's user-mode tools, maybe 'mistranslation' isn't right. Or perhaps 'other' because it doesn't fit neatly into other categories. But looking at the options again, 'hypervisor' seems more relevant if it affects KVM's determinism.
-
-Wait, but GDBStub is part of QEMU's user space and interacts with the virtual machine in a way that could be considered part of the debugging interface, not directly the hypervisor itself. So maybe 'debug' would be appropriate? However, 'debug' isn't one of the categories listed—wait, looking back, yes, there is a 'debug' category.
-
-But wait no, the categories given are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals. So 'debug' is an option.
-
-Wait, but in the initial list of possible categories, I see 'mistranslation', 'assembly', and others like 'device', etc., but not necessarily a direct 'debug' category. Wait no, looking again: yes, the user provided categories include 'debug'. So perhaps this bug falls under 'debug'.
-
-But wait, in the initial problem statement, the categories listed were:
-
-mistranslation
-assembly
-other
-device
-graphic
-socket
-network
-KVM
-boot
-vnc
-debug
-files
-permissions
-performance
-kernel
-peripherals
-hypervisor
-
-So yes, 'debug' is an option. But I'm trying to remember if GDBStub-related issues are classified under 'debug'. Alternatively, the issue relates to how QEMU's emulator (like KVM or other hypervisors) handles timing when breakpoints/watchpoints are set, which might be more of a hypervisor concern.
-
-But considering that the problem is about determinism in the guest's execution due to GDBStub operations, it's more about how debugging affects the virtual machine's state. Therefore, 'debug' seems appropriate.
-</think>
-
-The bug report discusses an issue with GDBStub causing non-deterministic behavior when breakpoints or watchpoints are used in single-core icount mode. Since this relates to debugging functionality and its impact on the virtual machine's execution, the most fitting category is:
-
-**debug**
-
-However, upon further reflection, since the issue pertains to how the hypervisor (KVM) manages state changes and timing due to GDBStub's interaction, it might be more accurately classified under 'hypervisor'. But given that the problem directly relates to debugging features affecting determinism, 'debug' is still appropriate.
-
-**debug**
-
-But considering the categories again, perhaps it's better aligned with how the hypervisor handles timing, so:
-
-**hypervisor**
-
-Wait, I'm now a bit confused. The initial thought was 'debug', but since GDBStub interacts with the hypervisor's state management, maybe 'hypervisor' is more precise.
-
-After careful consideration, the correct category seems to be:
-
-**hypervisor**
\ No newline at end of file