summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/479
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:34:26 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:35:44 +0000
commit25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 (patch)
tree0f056db167683be54ea1e5e72d29d6069af55e7d /results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/479
parent8e6da29e4ee5fc14bc1cc816a24f21271f14090d (diff)
downloadqemu-analysis-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.tar.gz
qemu-analysis-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.zip
add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/479')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/47913
1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/479 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/479
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..7ed67f997
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/hypervisor/479
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The categories are: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, the error message is an assertion failure in rcu.h:93. The specific line says `p_rcu_reader->depth != 0` failed. This suggests that when trying to unlock a read lock in RCU (Read-Copy-Update), the depth was zero, which isn't allowed.
+
+RCU is related to concurrency control, typically used in multi-threaded environments. In QEMU, this would be part of the hypervisor's internal workings, handling things like CPU and memory management between the host and guest operating systems.
+
+The error occurs during a system call when using qemu-system-aarch64, which implies it's running an AArch64 machine. The issue is likely in how RCU handles its state transitions or reader counts. Since this is a low-level assertion failure related to concurrency and internal QEMU structures, the category that best fits this is 'hypervisor'. 
+
+Other categories like 'kernel' might be tempting, but since this is part of QEMU's own code handling virtualization rather than guest OS kernels, hypervisor is more accurate. It doesn't fall under any other specific category listed.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file