add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/kernel/1007 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/kernel/1007
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c20966ac4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/kernel/1007
@@ -0,0 +1,28 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "qemu-user: add execveat syscall support". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I'll break down the bug report. It's about adding support for the execveat syscall in qemu-user. QEMU is an emulator and a virtualization tool that can run different operating systems under other environments.
+
+The term "syscall" usually refers to system calls, which are functions provided by the operating system kernel. So this seems related to how the user-mode QEMU handles system calls when running guest programs.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation: This is about incorrect mapping from source architecture to target or IR. It's more of a translation issue rather than adding new features.
+- Assembly: Lowering assembly code, but here it's about adding a syscall, not about assembly lowering.
+- Device: Not directly related unless execveat interacts with devices, which I don't think is the case.
+- Graphic: Unrelated to graphics.
+- Socket/network: Maybe if execveat deals with sockets or network calls, but in this context, it's about the syscall itself.
+- KVM: Kernel-based Virtual Machine. Adding a syscall support doesn't directly relate to KVM unless QEMU is integrating more tightly with the hypervisor, which isn't indicated here.
+- Boot: Not related to booting processes.
+- VNC: Unrelated.
+- Debug: Probably not related to debugging features.
+- Files/permissions: Possibly, but again, it's about syscall support.
+- Performance: Could be, but adding a feature isn't necessarily about performance optimization.
+- Kernel: This seems relevant because execveat is a system call that interacts with the kernel. QEMU might need to handle this in its emulation of user-mode processes.
+- Peripherals: Not directly unless it's hardware-related, which it's not.
+- Hypervisor: KVM is a hypervisor, but adding syscall support is more about the guest OS interaction rather than hypervisior functions.
+
+So, considering all categories, "kernel" seems to be the most appropriate because it relates to how QEMU handles system calls that interact with the underlying operating system's kernel.
+</think>
+
+kernel
\ No newline at end of file