add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/2010 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/2010
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d4533446a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/manual-review/2010
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to understand this error log. It looks like a test run in QEMU using Avocado encountered an issue and was interrupted by a SIGTERM signal. Let me break down what's happening here.
+
+First, the error message is a RuntimeError stating that the test was interrupted by SIGTERM. I remember that SIGTERM is a signal sent to terminate a process gracefully. So, something must have triggered this signal during the test execution.
+
+Looking at the stack trace, the test started with `self.run_rr` which called `run_vm`. Then it went into `wait_for_console_pattern`, and further down to `_console_interaction`. The error occurred when trying to read from the console using `console.readline().decode().strip()`. But right before that, there's a call to `sigterm_handler` in Avocado's runner plugin, which raised the RuntimeError.
+
+I'm wondering why the SIGTERM was sent. Maybe the test environment had some resource limits or timing issues. Perhaps another process or part of the system decided to terminate this test. Alternatively, maybe the test itself tried to terminate after a certain condition wasn't met.
+
+The stack trace points to where the signal handling happened. I should check if Avocado has any specific configurations for handling signals. Maybe it's set up to interrupt tests under particular circumstances, like exceeding time limits or resource usage.
+
+Also, looking at the code flow, `run_rr` and `run_vm` are part of QEMU's test suite. They probably start a QEMU VM and interact with its console. The error happened while waiting for a specific console pattern, so maybe the VM didn't boot correctly or took too long, causing the test to be terminated.
+
+I should consider possible causes: 
+1. **Resource Issues**: Maybe the system ran out of memory or CPU resources, leading to the process being killed.
+2. **Timeouts**: The test might have a timeout mechanism that sent SIGTERM if it didn't finish in time.
+3. **External Intervention**: Perhaps another script or user manually terminated the process.
+4. **Buggy Code**: There could be an issue in the Avocado or QEMU code that caused an unintended signal to be sent.
+
+To diagnose further, I might need to check system logs for any other messages around this time. Also, looking into the test's configuration, like resource limits or timeout settings, could provide clues. Additionally, verifying if all dependencies and environments are correctly set up before running the tests might help prevent such issues in the future.
+</think>
+
+The error you encountered indicates that your QEMU test was interrupted by a SIGTERM signal, likely due to a timeout or system resource issue. Here's how to address it:
+
+1. **Check System Resources**: Ensure your system has enough CPU and memory for the test. Monitor resource usage during testing.
+
+2. **Review Test Configuration**: Look into Avocado's settings for any timeouts or resource limits that might be causing the interruption.
+
+3. **Inspect Logs**: Examine logs from QEMU, Avocado, and system logs around the time of the error for additional clues.
+
+4. **Test Environment Setup**: Verify that all dependencies are correctly installed and configured to prevent unexpected issues during test execution.
+
+By addressing these areas, you can identify why the SIGTERM was triggered and take steps to prevent it in future runs.
\ No newline at end of file