add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 31 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/929 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/929
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..52cae43fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/mistranslation/929
@@ -0,0 +1,31 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue is that when someone runs a program using `qemu-x86_64`, specifically one that calls the clone syscall, it returns an error (-1) instead of succeeding. The same program works fine outside of QEMU.
+
+First, I'll look at the provided categories to see which one fits best: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other.
+
+The problem involves a system call (clone) failing in QEMU but working fine natively. Since clone is part of the Linux sched functions and syscalls, it's related to how QEMU handles syscalls in user mode. The mention that this happens across different compilers suggests it's not a compiler-specific issue, so maybe it's something with how QEMU translates or emulates the syscall.
+
+I remember that QEMU has several components: the CPU emulator (which might handle syscalls), device emulation, and the hypervisor part which is KVM. Since clone is a system call in user mode, it's more about how QEMU handles user-mode operations rather than kernel-level stuff.
+
+Looking into possible categories, 'mistranslation' refers to incorrect mapping from source architecture to target IR or the actual machine. If the clone syscall isn't being translated properly, that could cause the error. Alternatively, 'assembly lowering' might be if there's an issue in converting higher-level code to assembly during emulation.
+
+But I'm not entirely sure if it's specifically a translation issue or something else. Another angle is considering whether this is related to how QEMU emulates system calls for user-mode processes. If the syscall handling isn't implemented correctly, that could lead to such failures.
+
+I also think about other possibilities like device-related issues, but clone doesn't directly interact with hardware devices. Network might be involved if there's some IPC happening, but in this case, it's a simple clone call. Similarly, graphic or socket issues don't seem relevant here.
+
+Considering the user is running under QEMU, and clone syscall fails, it points more towards how the emulator handles syscalls. Since 'mistranslation' deals with semantic mapping between source and target architectures, and if clone isn't handled correctly in the translation layer, that could cause the issue.
+
+Alternatively, 'assembly lowering' might be about generating correct assembly code for the target, but I'm not certain. Maybe it's more of a syscall handling bug in QEMU's user-mode emulation.
+
+Wait, another thought: maybe it's related to how signals or process management is handled in the emulator. Since clone creates a new thread or process, perhaps QEMU isn't correctly emulating that context switch or signal handling.
+
+Looking back at the categories, 'hypervisor' refers more to KVM, which is a kernel-based hypervisor. If this were a KVM issue, it might be different, but since it's user-mode QEMU, maybe not.
+
+So, considering all these points, I think 'mistranslation' or 'other' could fit. But given that the clone syscall isn't being handled correctly in terms of parameters or return values, it's likely a translation issue between how the source (user program) is mapped to the target (QEMU's emulation). Therefore, 'mistranslation' seems appropriate.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where the `clone` system call fails when run under QEMU. The problem occurs in user-mode, indicating that the system call handling might be incorrect within the emulator. This suggests a potential issue with how QEMU translates or handles certain syscalls in its user-mode environment.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file