diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 07:27:52 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 07:27:52 +0000 |
| commit | d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a (patch) | |
| tree | f8f784b0f04343b90516a338d6df81df3a85dfa2 /results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1655700 | |
| parent | 7f4364274750eb8cb39a3e7493132fca1c01232e (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a.tar.gz qemu-analysis-d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a.zip | |
add deepseek and gemma results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1655700')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1655700 | 20 |
1 files changed, 0 insertions, 20 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1655700 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1655700 deleted file mode 100644 index 5c634723d..000000000 --- a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/1655700 +++ /dev/null @@ -1,20 +0,0 @@ -<think> -Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the details carefully. - -The issue is in the file `qemu/disas/libvixl/vixl/invalset.h`. The problem points out potential issues with binary search code where array indices like 'low' and 'middle' are used before checking their limits. Specifically, there's a style warning about using these indices without ensuring they're within bounds. - -Looking at the code examples provided, it seems that in the while loops, the variables 'low', 'high', and 'middle' are being incremented or decremented without first validating if accessing elements[low] or elements[middle] is safe. This could lead to out-of-bounds errors or undefined behavior. - -The user also mentions that similar code elsewhere didn't get reported, which suggests a possible inconsistency in how such issues are handled. They're puzzled why the standard library's binary search isn't used instead, implying that maybe the custom implementation has more bugs or is harder to maintain. - -Considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and 'other'. - -This bug seems related to code correctness and style issues within a binary search implementation. It's not directly tied to user-mode translation (so not mistranslation), nor does it involve assembly lowering. The issue is more about the implementation of an algorithm (binary search) in C, which falls under programming practices rather than specific QEMU components like device drivers or network handling. - -Since the problem isn't fitting into any of the other listed categories and seems to be a code quality/style issue within the source library used by QEMU, the most appropriate category would be 'other'. -</think> - -The bug report points out potential issues in binary search implementation where array indices are accessed without proper bounds checking. This is related to code correctness rather than specific QEMU components or features. - -**Answer:** -other \ No newline at end of file |