diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-06-30 12:34:26 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-06-30 12:35:44 +0000 |
| commit | 25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 (patch) | |
| tree | 0f056db167683be54ea1e5e72d29d6069af55e7d /results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2687 | |
| parent | 8e6da29e4ee5fc14bc1cc816a24f21271f14090d (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.tar.gz qemu-analysis-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.zip | |
add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2687')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2687 | 29 |
1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2687 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2687 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..eb3098ebc --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2687 @@ -0,0 +1,29 @@ +<think> +Alright, let's see. The user is reporting a bug in QEMU related to the qtest functionality with clock_set and clock_step. They provided a Python script that was working before but now doesn't update the time as expected. + +First, I need to understand what the issue is. The problem seems to be that after a certain commit (bc02be45...), setting the clock via qtest isn't working anymore. When they run their script, the command "clock_set 1234" doesn't result in any time update, and the function qemu_virtual_clock_set_ns is never called. + +Looking at the possible categories: I see options like 'mistranslation', 'assembly', 'device', etc. The issue here isn't about assembly or translation errors since it's related to qtest commands not triggering the expected behavior. + +The bug report mentions that clock_step is used extensively via qtest_clock_step, but no one noticed because the return value wasn't being checked. This suggests that the problem might be in how QEMU handles qtest commands specifically, possibly a regression introduced by a recent change aimed at preventing deadlocks. + +So, the key here is that it's related to testing and control of the emulator's clock via qtest. The qtest subsystem allows for testing QEMU by sending commands over a socket. Since this bug affects the interaction with the clock functions through qtest, it's likely under the 'qtest' category if that were an option, but since it's not listed, I have to choose from the given options. + +Wait, looking back at the categories provided: they are 'mistranslation', 'assembly', 'other', 'device', 'graphic', 'socket', 'network', 'KVM', 'boot', 'vnc', 'debug', 'files', 'permissions', 'performance', 'kernel', 'peripherals', 'hypervisor'. + +None of these directly mention qtest. However, the problem is about how QEMU's internal functions are being called (or not) when using qtest commands. It could be related to the device or perhaps the way the hypervisor interacts with the clock. + +But since it's more about the control flow within QEMU due to a change in handling deadlocks, and the specific function calls aren't happening as they should, I think this might fall under 'other' because it doesn't fit into the other categories provided. Alternatively, perhaps it relates to 'hypervisor', but that seems less likely. + +Wait, 'qtest' is part of the testing framework, not a category here. So given the options, maybe 'device'? Because clock functions could be seen as device-related, or perhaps 'other' since it's more about control flow and function calls not being made as expected. + +But looking again, the problem is that when using qtest to send commands (like clock_set), the corresponding internal QEMU functions aren't being triggered. This points towards an issue in how the qtest subsystem is handling these commands, which could be a bug in the qtest protocol or its implementation. Since none of the categories directly relate to testing or qtest itself, 'other' seems appropriate as it's not fitting into any specific listed category. + +Alternatively, if I consider that this might be an issue with how the clock device is handled, then perhaps 'device' could be the category. But I'm not entirely sure. The problem isn't about a hardware device failing but rather about QEMU's internal functions not being called as they should when using qtest commands. + +Hmm. Given the options and the nature of the bug, I think 'other' is the safest choice because it doesn't neatly fit into any other category provided. +</think> + +The issue revolves around qtest functionality where clock_set isn't updating the time due to a regression in QEMU. The problem affects how QEMU handles internal function calls via qtest commands, which doesn't fall under any specific listed category except 'other'. + +Answer: other \ No newline at end of file |