summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2932
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:34:26 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-06-30 12:35:44 +0000
commit25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320 (patch)
tree0f056db167683be54ea1e5e72d29d6069af55e7d /results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2932
parent8e6da29e4ee5fc14bc1cc816a24f21271f14090d (diff)
downloadqemu-analysis-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.tar.gz
qemu-analysis-25f8033d556aa17afaea4a5196ea7a69fe248320.zip
add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2932')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/293221
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2932 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2932
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a7fb567e7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/2932
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have this bug report: "QEMU flag fuzz targets not WAI". Hmm, I'm not exactly sure what that means, but let's try to break it down.
+
+First, QEMU is a versatile machine emulator and virtualization tool. It allows you to run different operating systems and hardware under emulation. So when something goes wrong with QEMU flags, it's probably related to how certain features or behaviors are being set or handled.
+
+The term "fuzz targets" makes me think of fuzzing, which is a software testing technique where random inputs are used to find security issues or bugs in programs. In this context, maybe the bug report refers to some part of QEMU that's supposed to handle specific flags but isn't working correctly when being tested via fuzzing.
+
+The phrase "not WAI" is confusing. I'm not sure what WAI stands for here. It could be an acronym related to testing or compliance—maybe something like "Well-Defined, Architected Interface"? Or perhaps it's a typo and they meant "WAI" as in the World AI Initiative? That doesn't seem right. Alternatively, "WAI" might refer to "Windows Anti-virus" or another specific term, but I'm not certain.
+
+Putting this together, the bug is likely about QEMU flags not being handled correctly when tested with a fuzzing tool. So which category does that fall into?
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Hmm. "Fuzz targets" might relate to how QEMU handles certain inputs or flags during testing, which could be a general bug that doesn't fit into the more specific categories like device, graphic, etc. Since I'm not sure if it's related to assembly translation (mistranslation) or some other aspect, and considering "other" is an option for miscellaneous bugs.
+
+So maybe the category is "other".
+</think>
+
+The bug report mentions QEMU flags and fuzz targets, which doesn't fit into specific categories like device or network. It's likely a general issue, so the category is:
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file