add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 26 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/626 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/626
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8f9700ff4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/other/626
@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "plugin reference to qemu_plugin_hwaddr_phys_addr fails to dynamically link". Let me think through each possible category.
+
+First, the issue is with a plugin referencing something that doesn't dynamically link. So, it's related to how QEMU handles plugins or their dependencies.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation: No, this would be about incorrect mapping from source to target.
+- Assembly lowering: Unlikely; this is more about code generation.
+- Device: Maybe, but device issues are usually hardware-specific.
+- Graphic, socket, network: Doesn't seem related.
+- KVM: Could be, since it's a hypervisor component. But let me think deeper.
+- Boot, VNC, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor: Hypervisor seems relevant because plugins often integrate with the hypervisor layer.
+
+Wait, but 'hypervisor' is an option. The problem might be in how the plugin interacts with KVM or another hypervisor component. Alternatively, it could fall under 'other' if none of the specific categories fit. However, considering that the issue relates to dynamic linking and a function reference in plugins, which are part of QEMU's core but interact with external modules or the hypervisor.
+
+But actually, 'hypervisor' isn't directly about dynamic linking errors; that's more about runtime issues. Maybe it's better categorized under 'other' since it's a plugin issue not fitting into specific hardware categories like device or network.
+
+Wait, no—plugins can be related to various functionalities. Since the problem is about dynamic linking failure in a plugin reference, perhaps it's more of an application-specific error rather than a hardware component. Therefore, 'other' seems appropriate because it doesn't fall neatly into the given specific categories like device, graphic, etc.
+
+Alternatively, if the plugin is part of KVM or another hypervisor's setup, maybe 'hypervisor'. But I'm not entirely sure. Let me recall that plugins in QEMU can be for various purposes, but this error seems to be about a missing symbol during runtime linking, which could happen in any plugin context regardless of the specific component it's supposed to handle.
+
+So, considering all options, the best fit is 'other'.
+</think>
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file