add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/1338 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/1338
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d1b9d81e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/1338
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the bug report "Remove gprof" into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I'm thinking about what "gprof" is. Gprof stands for GNU Profiler. It's a profiling tool used to measure the performance of programs by analyzing their execution time and function calls. In the context of QEMU, which is an emulator and virtualization tool, gprof would likely be used to profile the performance of the emulated machine or the host.
+
+The user wants to "Remove gprof," so this is about removing a profiling feature from the codebase. Profiling tools are typically related to performance analysis. So if they're removing a profiler, it's probably part of optimizing performance or reducing overhead in QEMU.
+
+Looking at the categories, "performance" seems like the most fitting because gprof relates directly to measuring and improving program efficiency. Other categories don't seem as relevant here. Mistranslation is about incorrect semantic mapping during compilation, which doesn't apply. Debugging tools might be related, but removing a profiler isn't exactly debugging—it's more about performance optimization.
+
+So I think the correct category is "performance."
+</think>
+
+performance
\ No newline at end of file