add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/1505041 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/1505041
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..2cb83ed1a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/performance/1505041
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user provided a detailed bug report about QEMU where reverting live snapshots takes increasingly longer over time, especially in VMs with certain timer configurations.
+
+First, I need to understand the problem. The issue is that when using live snapshots and reverting them after some time, the revert time increases linearly with the snapshot's age. This affects performance because it takes way too long—over 20 minutes for a test run, which isn't feasible. 
+
+Looking at the details, the VMs affected have specific <timer> tags in their libvirt XML files. They include multiple timers like rtc, pit, and hpet with delay tickpolicies. Unaffected VMs only have a simple clock offset without these detailed timers.
+
+The user also provided steps to reproduce: setting up a Windows VM, configuring the clock, taking a snapshot, reverting it, and observing the slowdown. Workarounds involve changing the timer settings, but the default isn't working well.
+
+Now, categorizing this bug. The options are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about performance during snapshot revert, which seems related to how QEMU handles the timers and clock settings. Since it's impacting the time taken for an operation (revert), which is a performance metric, but more specifically tied to how certain components (timers) are managed in the VM configuration.
+
+However, the problem isn't directly about translation between architectures or assembly lowering, so 'mistranslation' and 'assembly' don't fit. It's not related to networking, graphics, or sockets either. The timers are part of the system's clock management, which is more of a kernel or hypervisor-related feature.
+
+But wait, in QEMU/KVM context, the hypervisor is involved when managing VMs. However, the issue here seems specific to how the snapshot revert handles timekeeping, possibly affecting performance metrics during this operation. The user mentioned that changing the clock definition and timer policies affects the revert time, so it's more about how QEMU manages these timers and their impact on system performance.
+
+Alternatively, since the problem is related to the VM's clock settings and their effect on snapshot operations, which are part of the hypervisor's responsibilities, maybe 'hypervisor' could be a category. However, another angle is that this affects the overall performance of the revert process, so it might fall under 'performance'.
+
+But given that the issue is about timers in the VM configuration leading to increased revert times, and since timers are typically managed by the hypervisor (QEMU/KVM) as part of virtualization, I think 'hypervisor' would be appropriate. However, another perspective is that this affects how resources are used during the revert, which could impact performance.
+
+Wait, but looking at the categories again, 'performance' is a separate category. Since the primary issue is about the time taken for the operation (revert), which directly relates to performance degradation, perhaps 'performance' is more accurate. Alternatively, if it's tied to how the hypervisor handles certain virtual devices or timers, 'hypervisor' might be suitable.
+
+But considering that the user provided a workaround involving changing timer settings in the VM configuration, which affects the revert time, and that this isn't about the overall system performance but rather a specific operation's efficiency, I think it's better categorized under 'performance'. The bug is causing a significant delay during the revert process, which is a performance issue.
+
+So after considering all points, the category should be 'performance'.
+</think>
+
+performance
\ No newline at end of file