add new temporary deepseek-r1:14b results

33 files changed, 517 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1018530 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1018530
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..cfe8e62f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1018530
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The user is having trouble with write access in a 9p/virtfs shared folder. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+They set up a shared folder using libvirt, specified as type 'mount' with accessmode 'passthrough'. They mounted it inside the VM using mount -t 9p with some options. The permissions on the host are all 777, but they can't write in the VM. However, another similar setup with an NTFS filesystem works fine.
+
+Hmm, so the problem is specifically with XFS as the original filesystem. They're using Ubuntu 12.04 and QEMU-KVM version 1.0+noroms-0ubuntu13.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue seems related to how file permissions are handled when accessing the shared folder. Since it's a 9p/virtfs setup, which is a virtual filesystem in QEMU/KVM, and they're encountering write permission issues despite correct host permissions, it might be a problem with how the permissions are being translated or enforced within the VM.
+
+I think this falls under 'permissions' because it's about file access rights not being properly handled. Alternatively, since it's related to the virtual filesystem setup, maybe 'files'? But 'permissions' seems more specific to the issue described.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1027525 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1027525
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3d5688873
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1027525
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The user is reporting an issue where they can't insert a CD image located on a read-only NFS mount using the change command in the monitor. However, when they remount it as read-write, it works fine.
+
+First, I'll analyze the problem. The main issue seems to be related to file permissions and access rights. When the ISO directory is mounted read-only, QEMU can't open the file during the change command. But with read-write access, it succeeds. This points towards a permissions or file handling issue rather than something like translation errors or assembly problems.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The key here is that it's about file access. The problem arises when trying to open a file from an NFS mount with specific permissions. So the issue isn't related to how QEMU translates instructions (mistranslation) or assembly code (assembly). It also doesn't seem like a network issue because it's more about file accessibility.
+
+The bug is specifically about QEMU's ability to access files, particularly when they're on an NFS mount with read-only permissions. So the categories related to file handling would be 'files' and 'permissions'. Since the problem revolves around the read-only nature making the change command fail, it's more about permissions. However, both could be relevant.
+
+Wait, but the main issue is that QEMU can't open the file because of the mount's read-only setting. That relates to how QEMU handles file access and permissions when trying to modify or access files at runtime via the monitor. Since the change command is failing due to inability to open the file, it's a permission issue.
+
+Therefore, the most appropriate category would be 'permissions' as the core problem lies in QEMU's ability (or inability) to handle file operations based on the filesystem's read-only status.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1066 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1066
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..62d0a78ea
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1066
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's look at the problem description.
+
+The user is reporting that virtfs fails to access contents of non-readable directories in QEMU. They provided steps to reproduce where they create a directory structure and set permissions so that 'test/foo' isn't readable. When accessing via the guest, commands like ls fail with permission denied errors.
+
+Hmm, the issue seems related to file system permissions within the virtual machine. Virtfs is responsible for providing file access services to the VM. The problem occurs when trying to access directories without proper read permissions, leading to failures in the guest OS.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'permissions' seems directly relevant because it's about how file accesses are handled based on permissions. Other options like 'device', 'network', or 'graphic' don't fit here. It's specifically about file system permissions not being handled correctly, so 'permissions' is the right category.
+</think>
+
+The issue revolves around file access permissions within a virtualized environment, where non-readable directories aren't accessible as expected through virtfs. This points directly to a permissions problem in how QEMU handles file access rights for the guest.
+
+Answer: permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/122 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/122
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..65e9a49c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/122
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "linux-user does not check PROT_EXEC". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I consider what each category means. Mistranslation is about incorrect semantic mapping from source to target. Assembly lowering relates to converting code to assembly. The other category is a catch-all. Device, graphic, socket, network are specific areas but the bug doesn't mention these directly. KVM is related to virtualization. Boot involves startup issues. VNC is remote desktop, debug is about debugging tools, files and permissions relate to file handling and access rights, performance is about speed or resource usage, kernel is low-level OS stuff, peripherals are hardware devices, hypervisor is part of the virtualization stack.
+
+The bug mentions "linux-user does not check PROT_EXEC". PROT_EXEC is a memory protection flag in Linux. It's related to whether a region of memory can be executed. If it's not checked, that could lead to security issues or incorrect behavior when executing code from areas not meant to be executable. This sounds like a permissions issue because PROT_EXEC controls execution rights.
+
+Files: Maybe, but it's more about memory than files. Permissions is more direct here since it's about access and execution rights. Kernel would also be relevant, as this is low-level OS stuff, but the immediate issue seems to be permissions not being enforced correctly.
+
+So between permissions and kernel. But the bug is specifically about a missing check on PROT_EXEC during user-mode operations. This could affect how memory regions are handled, potentially leading to security vulnerabilities if executable regions aren't properly managed. Therefore, it's a permissions-related issue because it deals with whether certain areas can be executed or not.
+
+I think "permissions" is the most fitting category here.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1432103 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1432103
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e76060aba
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1432103
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The bug is about an error in the x86 executable segment permission check. Let me break it down.
+
+The issue says that when the code segment register (%cs) selects an executable segment without read permission, certain mov instructions can still succeed without causing a general protection error. Hmm, this sounds like a problem related to how QEMU handles permissions and exceptions in the virtual environment.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, etc. The bug is about permission checks failing when they should cause an error. So it's related to how permissions are enforced in the virtual machine.
+
+Permissions category seems to fit because the issue revolves around read permissions not being correctly enforced when using %cs prefix in mov instructions. It's a problem with how QEMU handles access rights, leading to unexpected behavior without proper protection errors.
+
+I don't think it's about translation issues (mistranslation) or assembly lowering since it's more about permission checks. Other categories like network or graphics don't seem relevant here. So permissions is the most appropriate category.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1500265 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1500265
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..34c63c3f6
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1500265
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the provided categories. Let me read through the report carefully to understand what's being discussed.
+
+The user mentions a "nested 9p filesystem" using "security_model=mapped-xattr". They're observing that extended attributes starting with "user.virtfs" from the guest are being ignored. They suggest an escaping mechanism, like mapping "user.virtfs.x" on the guest to "user.virtfs.virtfs.x" on the host.
+
+So, this seems related to how file permissions and attributes are handled in QEMU's 9p filesystem when using nested virtual machines. The issue is about security model handling and attribute mapping, which affects how files are accessed and managed between the guest and host systems.
+
+Looking at the categories: "permissions" relates to access rights and attribute handling, which fits here because the bug is about attributes not being correctly passed or mapped. Other relevant categories might be "file" or "security", but those aren't listed. Since permissions directly deal with attribute access and user rights, that's the best fit.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1505652 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1505652
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..29952a451
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1505652
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to classify this bug report for QEMU.
+
+First, the user is experiencing an IO error when trying to create a live snapshot using virsh with libvirt. The error message mentions that the QEMU command 'transaction' failed due to an I/O error, specifically "Operation not permitted (EPERM)". 
+
+Looking at the provided code snippet from QEMU's `handle_aiocb_rw_linear` function, it seems that during an asynchronous I/O operation using `pwrite`, the system call is failing with EPERM. The error suggests that the process doesn't have the necessary privileges to perform this operation.
+
+The bug report indicates that the problem occurs when creating a snapshot, which involves writing data to a disk image. The function stack shows that it's part of the external snapshot preparation process, involving block I/O operations through libaio (as seen in `paio_submit` and related functions).
+
+Considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other.
+
+The error is related to file I/O permissions. The process lacks appropriate privileges when performing the `pwrite` system call. This falls under file permissions issues because it's about the ability of the process to access or modify files, which is governed by Unix permissions and capabilities.
+
+Therefore, the category that best fits this bug report is "permissions".
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1548471 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1548471
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..0d6a72793
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1548471
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify the given bug report into one of the provided categories. Let me read through the bug report carefully.
+
+The user reports an issue during live block migration where the log file is either copied or created on the destination but ends up empty. They mention that during regular (cold) migration, the log file moves successfully. They attempted a fix by using SCP from source to destination but faced issues because the log file is owned by libvirt-qemu user, which they can't access as a regular OpenStack user.
+
+The categories provided are: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Let me break down the problem. The issue is related to log files not being migrated correctly during live block migration. They tried a workaround (SCP) but couldn't because of ownership issues. This suggests that there's an access or permission problem when handling the log file during migration.
+
+Looking at the categories, "files" could be relevant since it's about file handling and transfer. However, permissions are explicitly mentioned as part of the issue. The user can't perform SCP because the file is owned by another user (libvirt-qemu), which points directly to a permissions problem.
+
+So, "permissions" seems like the most accurate category here because the bug is related to access rights when migrating files between systems during live migration.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1626972 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1626972
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8f3cedc7b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1626972
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user provided a list of possible categories like mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, etc., and wants me to choose just one word from them.
+
+Looking at the bug report: It's about QEMU using a fallback mechanism for creating shared memory during live migrations when memfd_create isn't available (like on older kernels). This fallback tries to create files in /tmp but gets blocked by apparmor. The error logs show apparmor denials when trying to create or open files in /tmp.
+
+So, the issue is with how QEMU handles the creation of shared memory files under certain security configurations. Apparmor is preventing the necessary file operations in /tmp. The key here is that it's related to security drivers (apparmor) interfering with QEMU's behavior during live migration.
+
+The categories given include 'permissions' which relates to access rights and restrictions, exactly what apparmor enforces. So, even though the bug involves fallback mechanisms and filesystem operations, the root cause is a permissions issue due to apparmor policies.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1649236 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1649236
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..60814ec07
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1649236
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user mentioned that when they run QEMU with the daemonize option, committing snapshots fails with a permission denied error. Without daemonizing, it works fine.
+
+First, I need to understand what "commit all" does in QEMU. From what I know, "commit" is used with the snapshot feature. It writes any unsaved data from the guest's memory back to the storage medium, allowing the VM to checkpoint its state. So, this has to do with how snapshots are handled.
+
+The error occurs only when the VM is running in daemon mode. Daemonizing QEMU typically detaches it from the terminal and runs as a background process. The user connects via VNC to issue commands through the monitor.
+
+So why would "commit all" work without daemonize but not when it's daemonized? One possibility is that the permissions or access rights change when the process is detached. Maybe when running in the foreground, certain file descriptors or privileges are maintained, but in the background, they're lost or restricted.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: permissions seems relevant here because the error message directly mentions "Permission denied." This suggests an issue with how QEMU handles file access or system calls after daemonizing. It could be related to how the process's user or group is set when it becomes a daemon, affecting its ability to write to the snapshot files.
+
+Other possible categories like 'files' might also come into play because it's dealing with I/O operations on files (the VM image), but 'permissions' seems more specific to the error message. It points towards an access control issue rather than a problem with file handling in general or other areas like networking or hypervisor functions.
+
+So, putting this together, the main issue is related to permissions when the QEMU process runs as a daemon, leading to a denied attempt to commit changes.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1653577 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1653577
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bf35234b4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1653577
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let me try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The issue is about setting the umask for 9pfs so that files created by the guest can be accessed by other users on the host. Right now, only the user running QEMU and root can access them.
+
+First, I need to understand what each category means. Let's go through them:
+
+- **mistranslation**: This is about incorrect semantic mapping from source architecture to IR/target in user-mode.
+- **assembly**: Related to assembly lowering issues.
+- **device**: Probably hardware devices or device emulation problems.
+- **graphic**: Issues with graphics rendering.
+- **socket**: Problems with socket handling.
+- **network**: Networking-related bugs, like connectivity issues.
+- **KVM**: Kernel-based Virtual Machine specific bugs.
+- **boot**: Booting process issues.
+- **vnc**: VNC remote access problems.
+- **debug**: Debugging tools or features not working.
+- **files**: Filesystem-related issues, including permissions and access control.
+- **permissions**: Specific to file/directory permissions.
+- **performance**: Performance issues affecting speed.
+- **kernel**: Kernel-level bugs in QEMU.
+- **peripherals**: Issues with emulated peripherals like USB devices.
+- **hypervisor**: Bugs related to the hypervisor layer.
+
+The bug report mentions 9pfs and umask. 9pfs is a file system protocol used by QEMU for sharing files between the host and guest. The umask setting determines the default permissions of newly created files. This is about how the files are accessible on the host, which relates to filesystem permissions.
+
+Looking at the categories, 'files' seems relevant because it's about file access, but 'permissions' is more specific to file/directory permissions. Since the issue is specifically about setting umask and file accessibility based on permissions, 'permissions' is a better fit than just 'files'.
+
+I don't think it's related to other categories like network or graphic. It's not about device emulation either because it's about filesystem behavior.
+
+So, the category should be **permissions**.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1700380 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1700380
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e6d0b8b1c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1700380
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report. The user mentioned they're using QEMU version 2.9.0 and encountered a "Permission denied" error when trying to commit changes to the snapshot image. They used the -snapshot parameter, made some changes, and then tried to commit via telnet.
+
+First, I know that in QEMU, snapshots are read-only by default for certain devices unless explicitly allowed. The 'commit' command is used to save changes made to a snapshot. If it's denied, it likely relates to permissions on the device or how the image is being handled.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: "permissions" seems relevant here because the error message directly mentions "Permission denied." Other options like "device" or "graphic" don't fit as well. The user isn't having issues with assembly or performance, and it's not related to networking or VNC in this case.
+
+So, the issue is about the permissions when committing changes, which falls under the "permissions" category.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1779955 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1779955
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dbdd59bca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1779955
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out the category for this bug report. The user mentioned that when using read() with an mmap'ed address as the output buffer in QEMU's linux-user mode, it returns EFAULT instead of working as expected.
+
+So, first, I'm thinking about what each category means. "mistranslation" is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture. But this seems more like a permission issue with memory access.
+
+Looking at other categories, "permissions" stands out because the problem is about read permissions being required where they shouldn't be. The code works on qemu-system-arm and natively but fails in user-mode QEMU, which suggests it's an issue with how QEMU handles memory permissions when emulating.
+
+I don't see issues related to assembly lowering ("assembly"), hypervisor, or other areas like graphics or network. It's specifically about read vs write access on mmap'ed memory, so "permissions" fits best.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1810400 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1810400
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..be1449f49
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1810400
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The user provided a log snippet where the error message is "Failed to make dirty bitmaps writable: Can't update bitmap directory: Operation not permitted". 
+
+First, I need to understand what this error means. Dirty bitmaps in QEMU are used for tracking modified data in virtual disks when snapshots are taken. They help in efficiently managing changes and committing them during a block commit operation.
+
+The error message mentions that the operation isn't permitted, which suggests there's an issue with permissions or access rights. The process might not have the necessary privileges to update the bitmap directory. 
+
+Looking at the provided categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and others.
+
+The key here is "Operation not permitted". This usually relates to file or directory permissions. So it's likely a permission issue when trying to update the bitmap directory. 
+
+In QEMU, operations involving disk snapshots and block commits interact with the host filesystem. If the VM doesn't have sufficient permissions, it can't modify these files. Therefore, this error is related to file permissions rather than issues in assembly translation or graphics.
+
+Other possibilities: Could it be a kernel issue? Maybe, but the immediate cause seems more like a permission problem on the host. It's not directly related to network operations, sockets, or device drivers unless those are involved in file access, which they aren't here.
+
+So, considering all this, the category should be "permissions".
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1832877 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1832877
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..610844b48
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1832877
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU. The user mentioned that the qemu-bridge-helper is undocumented and broken. From the error message, it says "access denied by acl file" and "bridge helper failed." 
+
+I remember that in QEMU, when using network bridges, you need proper permissions to configure TAP interfaces. The bridge helper is responsible for setting up these connections, but if there's an issue with permissions or access control, the helper might fail.
+
+Looking at the categories provided, I see options like 'network' and 'permissions.' Since the problem relates to accessing the bridge helper and the ACL file (which is about permissions), this seems more related to permissions rather than just network configuration. The error message points towards an access denial, so it's likely a permission issue.
+
+Therefore, the category for this bug report should be 'permissions.'
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses issues with the qemu-bridge-helper and access denied errors due to ACL files, which relate to permission handling in QEMU when configuring network interfaces. 
+
+category: permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1832916 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1832916
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1a5c03bce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1832916
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's see what the bug is about. The user mentioned that "linux-user does not check PROT_EXEC." Hmm, PROT_EXEC refers to memory protection flags in Linux. It means that the system allows executing code from a specific page.
+
+The user points out that currently, the code doesn't verify if a page has PROT_EXEC before translating it. Instead, it only checks if the page is readable. That's not sufficient because even if a page is readable, it might not be executable, which could lead to issues like preventing execution of necessary code or allowing unintended code execution.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, and others like device, graphic, socket, etc. I'm thinking about what category fits best here. The problem seems related to how user-mode processes interact with memory permissions, which is part of system calls and process management. In QEMU, this would likely be handled in the userspace emulation layer.
+
+The bug report mentions that it's an issue within "linux-user," which refers to QEMU's Linux user-mode emulation. So, it's not about assembly translation or device/peripheral issues but rather a problem with how memory permissions are being checked during process execution.
+
+Wait, the categories include "files" and "permissions." PROT_EXEC is related to memory permissions, so maybe that falls under "permissions." Alternatively, since it's about translating user-mode processes correctly regarding their memory access rights, it might be closer to "mistranslation," but that category seems more about semantic mapping in code translation.
+
+Alternatively, considering the context of system calls and process management, perhaps it's a broader issue. Looking at the categories again: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. "Permissions" seems to directly relate here because PROT_EXEC is about memory protection flags.
+
+But wait, another angle: in QEMU, when emulating user-mode processes, ensuring that the right permissions are enforced is crucial. If it's not checking PROT_EXEC, it might lead to incorrect behavior where code isn't executed when it should be or is allowed to execute when it shouldn't. This sounds like a problem with how system calls are handled, specifically around memory management.
+
+So, "permissions" seems appropriate because it's about the correct handling of memory access rights. Alternatively, if this affects how processes run in user-mode and their execution permissions, maybe "kernel" since it's related to the OS kernel's memory management as emulated by QEMU.
+
+But considering that the issue is within the userspace emulation layer not correctly handling a specific permission flag, I think "permissions" is the most accurate category.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1838066 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1838066
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f86344941
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1838066
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out which category this bug report falls into. The error message says "Could not reopen file: Permission denied" when running QEMU. 
+
+First, I see that it's related to file operations, specifically trying to reopen a file and failing due to permission issues. The user mentioned they're using sudo with some preserved environment variables and the runas option, so there might be an issue with how permissions are being handled.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: mistranslation relates more to source architecture mapping, which doesn't seem relevant here. Assembly lowering is about converting code to assembly, not applicable either. 
+
+The error is clearly a permission problem when accessing a file, which points towards 'permissions' as the category. Other possibilities like network or device issues don't fit because the problem is explicitly with file access.
+
+So, the most fitting category is 'permissions'.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1838569 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1838569
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1328aa06f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1838569
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify the given bug report into one of the predefined categories. Let's look through the details provided.
+
+The user upgraded libvirt packages from 3.6 to 4.0 and noticed that virtio-balloon is broken during live migration. The logs show issues with loading the virtio-balloon device and an "Operation not permitted" error, which suggests a problem related to permissions or access rights.
+
+Looking at the categories: 'permissions' seems relevant because the issue arises after an upgrade, possibly due to changes in how certain files are accessed or handled by QEMU. The error message also mentions "Operation not permitted," pointing towards a permission-related problem.
+
+Other possible categories like 'device' could be considered since virtio-balloon is a device, but the specific error points more towards permissions rather than a general device issue.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1875139 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1875139
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c51c346db
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1875139
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me see what the issue is.
+
+The user reports that when they try to start a domain using Virt-manager, it fails because the 'readonly' device isn't writable. They mention that their root disk is an LVM2 thin snapshot marked as read-only. When attempting to start the domain, QEMU throws an error indicating the device is not writable due to permission denied.
+
+So, in this case, the problem occurs when a block device is set as read-only but QEMU tries to access it for writing anyway. The user points out that setting it to read-write fixes the issue, and they're confused why QEMU needs write access if the device is supposed to be read-only.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+I think this issue relates to block devices and their permissions. The error is about QEMU not being able to write to a read-only device, which suggests it's trying to access the device with incorrect permissions or without respecting the read-only flag. So the category should relate to how devices are handled in terms of permissions or file access.
+
+Looking at the options, "files" and "permissions" come to mind. The error is about not having write permission, so it's a permissions issue when accessing the block device. Therefore, the appropriate category would be "permissions."
+
+I don't think it's a mistranslation because that usually relates to incorrect mapping in code translation, which doesn't seem relevant here. It's more about how QEMU handles file access and permissions when trying to use a read-only device.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1891748 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1891748
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b940cee9d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1891748
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The issue is about qemu-arm-static version 5.1 not being able to run gcc, which causes an error message: "Allocating guest commpage: Operation not permitted". It worked fine with version 5.0.
+
+First, I'll look at the possible categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The error message mentions "Operation not permitted" which usually relates to file permissions or system calls that require certain privileges. Since this is happening when trying to allocate the guest commpage, it might be a permission issue within QEMU's handling of system resources.
+
+Looking at the categories, "permissions" seems like a direct fit because the error is about an operation not being permitted. Other possibilities could include "kernel" or "hypervisor", but those are more related to how QEMU interacts with the host OS or virtualization in general. However, the specific error points directly to permissions.
+
+So, I think the best category here is "permissions" because the problem arises from an operation not being allowed, likely due to incorrect file or system access rights in version 5.1 compared to 5.0.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1903833 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1903833
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a7b225fce
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1903833
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to figure out how to classify this bug report in QEMU. Let me read through the details carefully.
+
+The user mentioned that there's an issue with the SIGSEGV signal handler in user mode qemu-aarch64. Specifically, after handling a SEGV, QEMU marks the program's page as protected, and any subsequent memory access within the program triggers another SEGV for the signal handler. This is happening on WSL Ubuntu 20.04 under Windows 10 with QEMU version 5.1.50, and it's also reproducible in the latest upstream build.
+
+They provided a workaround by disabling an mprotect call, which fixes the issue. There's also mention that OpenJDK reports SIGSEGV immediately after starting, and a small reproducer program is attached.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue seems to be related to how QEMU handles signal handlers and memory protection. The problem arises because after handling a SEGV, the pages are marked as protected, leading to further issues when accessing them. This sounds like it's affecting how the program interacts with memory in user mode.
+
+I'm thinking about which category fits best. Mistranslation usually refers to incorrect mapping from source architecture to target, but this is more about signal handling and memory permissions. It doesn't seem directly related to assembly lowering either, since that's about converting code during translation.
+
+The issue involves signals and memory protection, so it might be a problem with how QEMU handles the operating system-level interactions, specifically in user mode emulation. Since it's not tied to device emulation, graphics, or networking, those categories don't apply here.
+
+Looking at the other options: boot, vnc, debug, etc., don't seem relevant. Kernel and peripherals might be related, but I'm not sure if this is a kernel issue specifically or a problem with how QEMU emulates certain system calls or memory management.
+
+Wait, in user mode emulation, QEMU's behavior regarding signal handling and memory protection could fall under the 'other' category since it doesn't fit into more specific areas like device emulation or network handling. Alternatively, it might be related to the hypervisor if it's about how the virtual machine is managed, but I'm not certain.
+
+But considering that the problem is in user mode and involves signal handlers and memory protection, which are OS-level functionalities, perhaps 'other' is the safest category because it doesn't fit into any of the more specific ones. Alternatively, maybe 'kernel' since it's about system calls and permissions.
+
+Wait, the bug affects how QEMU marks pages as protected after a SEGV, leading to further issues. This could be related to memory management in user mode, which is handled by the OS through syscalls. So perhaps it's more of an issue with how QEMU interacts with the host OS's memory management, which might fall under 'permissions' since it involves mprotect calls.
+
+But looking at the categories again, I see 'files', 'permissions', etc. Maybe 'permissions' is a better fit here because the problem revolves around page protection and access rights after handling a signal.
+
+Alternatively, 'other' could be the category if none of the specific ones apply. Hmm. Since it's about user-mode behavior in QEMU, which is part of the emulator's implementation, not necessarily a device or hypervisor issue, maybe 'other' is more appropriate.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1922625 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1922625
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..e309a071f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/1922625
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU. Let me read through it carefully.
+
+The user is reporting an issue where running `./configure --help` in a read-only directory causes the configure script to enter an infinite loop and print nonsense messages. Specifically, they extracted the source as one user and tried to run configure as another user. Normally, autoconf scripts handle this without issues, but QEMU's does not.
+
+Looking at the error messages, it seems like the script is trying to create a 'build' directory but doesn't have permission. It keeps looping because of this failure. The key points are permissions and directory access.
+
+Now, I need to categorize this bug from the given options: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The problem is related to running the script in a read-only directory and permission issues when trying to create directories or files. This falls under permissions because it's about file system access rights.
+
+I don't think it's 'other' because there's a specific category that fits—permissions. The issue isn't with translation, assembly, or any of the other listed categories like network or hypervisor. It's purely an access control problem during the build setup.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2039 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2039
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..f205507f7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2039
@@ -0,0 +1,9 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I'm looking at this bug report about QEMU. The user mentioned that when they use a qcow2 image on a logical volume (lvqcow2), the 'write' lock isn't checked when running `qemu-img check`. Normally, with a regular qcow2 file, there's a write lock to prevent risky operations. But with lvqcow2, no such check happens even if it's in use by a VM.
+
+I need to classify this bug into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The issue is about the lack of write lock checking during `qemu-img check` for lvqcow2 images. This relates to how file operations are handled, specifically regarding permissions and locks. Since it's related to accessing and modifying the image without proper checks, the category should be 'permissions'. It’s not a translation issue or performance problem; it's more about ensuring that necessary access controls are in place when interacting with these virtual images.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2624 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2624
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4ddbeb22c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2624
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm looking at this bug report for QEMU. The user is encountering an error when simulating a TPM2 device using QEMU. The specific error message is "qemu-system-aarch64: tpm-emulator: TPM result for CMD_INIT: 0x9 operation failed". They've also provided the steps they took, including starting swtpm with certain commands and the logs from both versions 0.7.3 and 0.10.0 of swtpm.
+
+First, I need to classify this bug according to the given categories. The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, or other.
+
+Looking at the error message and logs, it seems related to the TPM emulator in QEMU. The user is trying to simulate a TPM2 device, which suggests that this is a hardware-related issue within the virtualization environment. The specific errors mention "Permission denied" when trying to access files like lockfiles and data files for NV storage.
+
+The error occurs during initialization of the TPM, with issues related to file permissions. This points towards a problem with how the emulator is handling file operations or permissions, which falls under the 'files' category because it's about accessing files correctly.
+
+So, considering all this, the bug is related to file permissions when initializing the TPM device in QEMU. Therefore, the appropriate classification would be 'permissions'.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2747 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2747
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fb3e99a11
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2747
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let's see what the problem is.
+
+The user describes that when connecting via qemu+ssh://root, external snapshots are created with world-readable permissions. So, they're using virsh or virt-manager to create a snapshot, and the resulting file has too permissive permissions—anyone can read it.
+
+Looking at the steps, after creating the snapshot, when they run `ls -l`, the file's permissions show something like '-rw-r--r--', meaning others have read access. That's not secure because sensitive data could be exposed.
+
+The user tried setting umask 077 in their profile, but it didn't fix the issue. Umask affects file creation, so if that didn't work, maybe the permissions are being set at a different level or by another process.
+
+Now, looking at the categories: there's 'permissions' which seems directly related to file access rights. Other possibilities might be 'other', but since it's about file permissions, 'permissions' fits better.
+
+So, I think the category should be 'permissions'.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to file permissions when creating snapshots. The bug report mentions that external snapshots are created with world-readable permissions, which falls under file permissions. Therefore, the appropriate category is:
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2915 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2915
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..99301ba07
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/2915
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Okay, let's see. I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories for QEMU. The error is about QEMU failing to read an initrd file due to a permission denied issue.
+
+First, looking at the error message: "Failed to open file... Permission denied." This suggests that the problem is related to file access permissions. So the main issue here is that QEMU doesn't have the necessary permissions to open the specified initrd file.
+
+Now, looking at the categories provided: files, permissions, etc. The error is directly about accessing a file with insufficient permissions, so "permissions" seems like the most fitting category.
+
+I should check if any other categories might apply. It's not a mistranslation or an assembly issue because it's about file access. It also doesn't seem to be related to network, device, graphic, etc., since the problem is purely with file permissions.
+
+So, the correct classification for this bug report is "permissions."
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/321 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/321
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..a2092f9bb
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/321
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I have to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug is: "qemu 5.2.0 configure script explodes when in read only directory." 
+
+First, let's understand what each category means. The options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug is about the configure script exploding (which probably means it fails or crashes) when in a read-only directory. The configure script is part of the build process for QEMU; it generates the Makefile and other necessary configurations based on the system's setup and user options.
+
+Looking at the categories, none directly mention 'configure' or 'script'. Mistranslation is about incorrect semantic mappings during compilation, which doesn't fit here. Assembly is about lowering code to assembly, not applicable. Other is a catch-all, but perhaps there's a better fit.
+
+Device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug – these are all related to specific components or functionalities of QEMU. The issue isn't with any of those.
+
+Looking further, 'files' might be relevant because it's about handling files during the configure process, but specifically, the problem is with permissions since the directory is read-only. So 'permissions' seems a good fit.
+
+Alternatively, 'other' could be considered, but since the bug relates to how QEMU interacts with file system permissions during configuration, 'permissions' is more precise.
+</think>
+
+The bug involves the configure script failing due to file permission issues in a read-only directory, which falls under the category of handling file permissions. Therefore, the appropriate classification is:
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/342 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/342
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..1d16e1bda
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/342
@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The message says: "Assertion `child->perm & BLK_PERM_WRITE' failed in bdrv_co_write_req_prepare through atapi." 
+
+First, let me break down the components here. The assertion failure is about a permission check related to block devices. Specifically, it's checking if the child has write permissions (BLK_PERM_WRITE). This happened in the function bdrv_co_write_req_prepare, which suggests it's part of the block device operations.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: there's 'permissions' as one option. The error is about a missing permission, so that seems directly related to permissions handling. 
+
+Other possible categories like 'device' or 'block' might be relevant since it's a block device issue, but the primary aspect here is the permission check failing. So, the most appropriate category would be 'permissions'.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/465 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/465
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..60524eb9d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/465
@@ -0,0 +1,15 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me start by reading through the information provided.
+
+The user mentioned that they have submitted patches for network virtualization support on macOS Big Sur and later versions. They say these patches work well on their 2019 MacBook Pro running Big Sur, but the only issue is that running the `qemu-system` command requires root privileges.
+
+Looking at the categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. 
+
+The main point here is that using `qemu-system` as a regular user isn't possible; it needs to be run as root. That sounds like a permission issue. Permissions are about the rights and access levels users have on the system. So when an application requires root access, it's related to permissions.
+
+Other categories don't seem to fit here. It's not about network configuration because the issue isn't with the network functionality itself but rather the requirement for elevated privileges. Similarly, it's not a problem with how QEMU interacts with devices or graphics. It's more about how the system handles user permissions when running the command.
+
+So, putting it all together, the bug report is pointing out that running `qemu-system` without root doesn't work, which is a permissions issue.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/515 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/515
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..046c8dd67
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/515
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user is reporting that when they run `qemu-system-x86_64` as a regular user, it fails with error code 1, regardless of the parameters used. They noticed that the issue was due to having an `/etc/qemu/qemu.conf` directory which their user didn't have permission to access. 
+
+Looking at the strace output, there's an `openat` call trying to access `/etc/qemu/qemu.conf`, which results in a permission denied error (EACCES). This causes QEMU to exit with status 1.
+
+The problem arises because when the directory exists but the user lacks permissions, QEMU fails without any warning. The user suggests adding a warning message to stderr so users can be informed of this issue if it occurs again.
+
+Now, considering the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The main issue here is a permission problem when accessing a specific file (`/etc/qemu/qemu.conf`). The bug is related to file permissions—specifically, the lack of access rights for the user running QEMU. 
+
+So, looking at the categories, "permissions" seems directly relevant because it's about whether the user has the necessary access rights to certain files or directories. This isn't a translation issue, nor does it pertain to assembly code, devices, graphics, networking, etc. It's more about how QEMU handles file permissions when accessing configuration files.
+
+Therefore, the appropriate category for this bug is "permissions."
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/798 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/798
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ad37ac782
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/798
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The user reports that when using both `-sandbox on,elevateprivileges=deny` and `-daemonize`, QEMU fails to launch. However, without `elevateprivileges=deny`, it works fine even with `-daemonize`. 
+
+Hmm, so what's happening here? The issue seems related to the interaction between the sandbox option and daemonizing. The sandbox is a security feature in QEMU that restricts certain privileges. When `elevateprivileges=deny` is set, it prevents QEMU from running with elevated privileges, which might be necessary for some operations.
+
+When you run QEMU normally without `-daemonize`, it runs as the current user. But when you use `-daemonize`, QEMU forks into the background and often needs to drop privileges or adjust its process context. If `elevateprivileges=deny` is set, maybe there's a conflict during this daemonization process because the sandbox restrictions are making it impossible to proceed.
+
+Looking at the categories provided: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The bug is about permissions related to privilege elevation when using the sandbox with daemonize. The key issue is that QEMU can't start under these conditions because of a permission problem or incorrect handling of privileges during daemonization.
+
+So the category that best fits here is 'permissions' since it's about how QEMU handles privilege changes, especially when running in daemon mode.
+</think>
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/807893 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/807893
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3872f7323
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/807893
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. The issue is about a privilege escalation when QEMU is started as root using the -runas option. It seems that the extra groups aren't being dropped correctly, which allows access to files like /dev/sda.
+
+Looking at the provided bug report, when QEMU runs as root with -runas, it doesn't drop all unnecessary groups. The user demonstrated this by showing that after setting gid and uid to 100, the process still has a lot of extra groups, including root (group 0). This means that even though QEMU is running under a non-root user, it's retaining some powerful group permissions, which can lead to security issues like privilege escalation.
+
+The suggested fix is to use initgroups() or setgroups(1, [gid]) in os-posix.c. These functions are used to set the group list for a process. Using setgroups with only the desired GID would drop all other groups, enhancing security by ensuring that QEMU doesn't have unnecessary privileges.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. 
+
+The bug is related to how groups and permissions are handled when running QEMU as root. It's a security issue where the application isn't properly dropping certain privileges. This falls under 'permissions' because it deals with group and user rights. Alternatively, it could be considered under 'security', but since that category isn't listed, I have to choose from the given options.
+
+Other categories don't fit as well. It's not about assembly translation or performance; it's specifically about how groups are managed. So, 'permissions' is the most appropriate category here.
+</think>
+
+The bug report deals with QEMU retaining extra group permissions when run as root, leading to potential privilege escalation. The issue is about improper handling of group privileges, which falls under the 'permissions' category.
+
+**Answer:** permissions
\ No newline at end of file
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/913 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/913
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..116893858
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2-tmp/reasoning/permissions/913
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report about QEMU sharing host files with the guest. Let me think through each possible category.
+
+The user mentioned "sharing host files," which relates to how QEMU handles file permissions or access between the host OS and the virtual machine. Looking at the categories provided:
+
+- Mistranslation: This is more about incorrect mapping from source to target, probably not related here.
+- Assembly lowering: Doesn't seem relevant.
+- Device, graphic, socket, network: These are hardware-related; file sharing isn't directly a device issue.
+- KVM, boot, vnc, debug: These are specific QEMU functionalities. The report doesn’t mention any of these specifically.
+- Files, permissions: This seems directly related because it's about how files and their permissions are handled between host and guest.
+- Performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor: While file sharing could affect performance or be part of the hypervisor, the primary issue here is about file access and permissions.
+
+So, the most fitting category is "permissions" because it deals with how files are shared and what level of access the guest has. It's about the handling of file permissions rather than any other aspect.
+</think>
+
+The bug report discusses QEMU's ability to share host files with the guest, which directly relates to file permissions and access control between the host and virtual machine.
+
+permissions
\ No newline at end of file