add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 17 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/187 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/187
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..8332b28a0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/187
@@ -0,0 +1,17 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report: "Cannot boot arm kernel images on s390x". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, the issue is about not being able to boot an ARM kernel image on s390x. s390x refers to IBM's mainframe architecture, which QEMU supports for emulation. The user is trying to run an ARM kernel under s390x, but it's failing.
+
+Looking at the categories, "boot" seems relevant because the problem is about the kernel not booting correctly. Alternatively, could it be related to the hypervisor or KVM? Well, QEMU can act as a hypervisor when using KVM for virtualization, but the issue here is about the kernel not booting on a specific target architecture.
+
+The "boot" category directly relates to the process of starting up an operating system kernel. Since the problem is that the kernel isn't booting on s390x, which might involve issues with how the emulation handles the boot process for different architectures, the appropriate category would be "boot".
+
+I don't think it's about translation or assembly because the issue is more about the boot process rather than the code generation. It's also not a performance issue or permissions problem. So, "boot" fits best.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves an issue with booting a kernel on a specific architecture, which falls under the category of booting processes.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file