add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 33 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/2729 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/2729
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..b59a2e0a7
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/boot/2729
@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to figure out how to classify this bug report for QEMU. The user mentioned that when they run `qemu-system-aarch64 -M raspi4b`, there's no valid DTB provided in x0 register. Let me break down the problem and see which category it fits into.
+
+First, understanding what a DTB is: DTB stands for Device Tree Blob. It's used by some architectures (like ARM) to describe hardware details at boot time. The error suggests that when QEMU starts, it doesn't have a valid DTB loaded into register x0, which is supposed to point to the device tree.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce: They create a simple loop binary and run QEMU with `-kernel loop.bin`. Then they start GDB and monitor x0 register. From the GDB session, it looks like x0 isn't pointing to a valid DTB; instead, it has some other values.
+
+So the issue is that QEMU isn't providing a proper DTB when starting with the Raspi4b machine type. This likely affects device initialization because the kernel or boot process expects a valid DTB for hardware configuration.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: The options are mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other. 
+
+I think "device" might be relevant because it's about hardware setup (DTB) during the boot process. But another possibility is "boot", since the issue occurs when starting QEMU. However, the problem seems more related to device initialization rather than the boot process itself.
+
+Wait, perhaps "hypervisor" isn't right because this is about the guest OS setup, not the hypervisor's operation. It could be "peripherals" if it's about hardware devices in the VM, but I'm not entirely sure.
+
+Alternatively, since the DTB is part of the initial boot information for the machine, maybe it's a "boot" issue. But given that the DTB is supposed to be provided during the setup, perhaps under the "device" category because it pertains to hardware configuration.
+
+But then again, when you start QEMU, if the machine type (Raspi4b) requires a specific device tree and isn't providing it correctly, that's more of a boot issue. So maybe "boot" is the correct category.
+
+Wait, but in this case, the user didn't specify a DTB explicitly with `-dtb` option, so perhaps QEMU should provide one automatically for Raspi4b. If it doesn't, then it's an issue with how QEMU handles the machine setup during boot.
+
+I'm torn between "boot" and "device". Since the problem is about the absence of a necessary device tree blob at startup, which is part of the initial hardware configuration provided to the guest, I think "device" might be more accurate. Alternatively, it could be "peripherals" if it's about the devices attached.
+
+Hmm. Another angle: The error occurs during the setup, specifically related to the machine type (Raspi4b), which suggests that the issue is with how QEMU initializes the machine, including its hardware description via DTB. Therefore, this seems like a boot-time configuration problem.
+
+But looking back at possible categories, "boot" is one of them, so maybe that's where it fits.
+</think>
+
+The bug report indicates an issue during the boot process where QEMU fails to provide a valid DTB for the Raspi4b machine type. This points to a problem in how QEMU initializes the machine configuration.
+
+**Answer:**
+
+boot
\ No newline at end of file