add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/1876373 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/1876373
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..3ff94819a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/1876373
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report related to QEMU into one of the given categories. Let me read through the problem carefully.
+
+The user is experiencing a segfault when using the mremap function in their program under QEMU for both i386 and 32-bit ARM targets. They provided a C program that reproduces the issue, which calls mmap to allocate memory and then mremap to shrink its size. The problem occurs specifically when resizing the buffer to 4096 bytes; changing it to another size like 12288 works fine.
+
+They tested this both natively (which works) and under QEMU (where it segfaults). They also mentioned that using -singlestep in QEMU shows the segfault happens during the mremap syscall. 
+
+Looking at the categories provided: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+Since this issue is related to a system call (mremap) causing a segfault under QEMU when resizing memory, it's likely an issue with how QEMU handles certain operations. The problem isn't directly in the user-mode translation or assembly lowering, but rather in the way the syscall is emulated or handled by the hypervisor.
+
+Given that mremap is a memory management function, and the segfault occurs during this call within QEMU, it might be an issue with how QEMU's hypervisor (or the underlying emulation) handles memory mappings. Alternatively, if it's specific to certain targets, maybe it's related to the device or kernel emulations.
+
+But considering that mremap is a syscall and the segfault occurs during its execution in the guest OS under QEMU, this points towards an issue in the hypervisor layer where the handling of such syscalls isn't correctly implemented. Therefore, the category would likely be 'hypervisor' since it pertains to how QEMU emulates system calls for the guest.
+
+Wait, but another thought: could it also fall under 'kernel'? The kernel is part of the target's emulation, but in this case, the issue occurs because QEMU isn't handling mremap correctly. So perhaps hypervisor is more accurate as it relates to the management of virtual machines and their resources, including memory.
+
+Yes, I think 'hypervisor' is the best fit here since it's about how the host (QEMU) handles guest OS syscalls.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes a segfault occurring during an mremap syscall under QEMU for specific target architectures. The issue arises from incorrect handling of the mremap system call in the hypervisor layer, leading to a crash when resizing memory. Therefore, the appropriate category is:
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file