add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/2180 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/2180
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..10d366f32
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/2180
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let's read through the details carefully.
+
+The problem is that when an interrupt is triggered whose descriptor isn't in physical memory, QEMU crashes. The user provided a test case using NASM assembly where they set up the IDT with a base address pointing beyond 2GiB, which causes QEMU to crash when the INT 0x00 is called.
+
+The error message mentions an assertion failure in cpus.c related to bql_lock_impl and a Bail out! message. It also notes that under KVM, it either loops forever or reports an internal error and pauses instead of crashing.
+
+Looking at the steps to reproduce, they involve running QEMU with a specific binary, but only when the guest has 2GB or less of memory. The code triggers an interrupt that points to an IDT descriptor not present in physical memory.
+
+Now, considering the possible categories: mistranslation is about incorrect semantic mapping from source to target, which might relate here if it's a translation issue. But looking deeper, the bug seems more related to how QEMU handles interrupts and their descriptors in the context of virtualization.
+
+The issue arises when the IDT base isn't correctly mapped or is beyond physical memory. This suggests a problem with how QEMU emulates hardware interrupts and checks for valid descriptor locations. Since it's about handling interrupt descriptors, which are part of the CPU's interrupt mechanism, this seems related to the hypervisor's management of guest OS components.
+
+The failure occurs during an interrupt handling process, leading me to think it's not a simple mistranslation but more about how QEMU manages virtualization aspects like interrupts and memory mapping. The mention of KVM (which is part of qemu-kvm) makes me consider whether this falls under the hypervisor category.
+
+Other categories like 'graphic' or 'network' don't seem relevant here since the bug is related to interrupt handling, not display or networking. Similarly, 'socket' isn't involved. 'Kernel' could be a possibility, but in this case, it's more about how QEMU emulates hardware for the guest OS, which points towards hypervisor functionality.
+
+Therefore, the most fitting category is probably 'hypervisor'.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file