add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 30 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/2626 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/2626
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..ff89b02f1
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/hypervisor/2626
@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I'm trying to classify this bug report for QEMU. The problem is that QEMU crashes after the host time moves backwards. Hmm, let's think about what each category means.
+
+The options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I need to understand the issue. The user mentioned that QEMU crashes after time synchronized and moved backwards on the host. They provided steps: changing tick period in the guest and running a loop that synchronizes hardware clock on the host.
+
+So, this seems related to how QEMU handles timing or synchronization between the host and the virtual machine. When the host's time moves backward, it affects QEMU's operation, causing a crash.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, probably not relevant here.
+- Assembly lowering: maybe, but this seems more about translation issues during compilation.
+- Other could be a catch-all, but perhaps there's a better fit.
+- Device: if it's related to hardware devices, maybe.
+- Graphic: doesn't seem related unless the display driver is involved.
+- Socket/network: possible if timing affects network operations, but not sure.
+- KVM: since QEMU often uses KVM for virtualization, this might be relevant. Timekeeping in hypervisors could be a key area.
+- Boot, vnc, debug: less likely as they don't directly relate to time issues.
+- Files, permissions, performance: maybe, but not the most direct fit.
+- Kernel/peripherals: if it's an issue with how QEMU interacts with the host kernel or hardware peripherals.
+
+Wait, moving host time could affect the way QEMU synchronizes time in the VM. This might involve the hypervisor layer because KVM is a type 2 hypervisor, and time management can be complex between host and guest.
+
+Alternatively, it could be a timing-related issue in device emulation, but devices usually don't handle time as directly. KVM manages virtualization at a low level, including timekeeping. So perhaps the crash is due to an inconsistency or error in how QEMU/KVM handles time changes on the host.
+
+So I'm thinking between 'other', 'device', 'hypervisor', and maybe 'kernel'. But since it's about time management which is handled by the hypervisor layer, the most appropriate category might be 'hypervisor'.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file