add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 19 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1097 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1097
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..4a8ea082f
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1097
@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I need to classify this bug report: "linux-user build broken on 32-bit ppc". Let me break it down.
+
+First, the user mentioned that the build is broken for the linux-user component. The term "build broken" suggests there's a compilation issue, possibly related to compatibility or architecture support.
+
+Next, they specified "32-bit ppc", which refers to PowerPC architecture in 32-bit mode. I know that QEMU supports various architectures, and sometimes there are issues with specific hardware configurations or OS targets.
+
+Looking at the possible categories: device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other, assembly, mistranslation.
+
+I need to determine which category fits best. The bug is about a build failure in the linux-user module for 32-bit PowerPC. Since it's related to user-mode and possibly an issue with architecture-specific code generation or translation from IR to target, that might fall under "mistranslation". Alternatively, if it's a general compilation error not tied directly to semantic mapping, maybe it's something else.
+
+But considering the options, "other" is a catch-all for issues that don't fit into specific categories. Since this seems like a build problem related to architecture support, which isn't explicitly listed except under 'assembly' or perhaps 'kernel', but I'm not sure if kernel applies here. 
+
+Wait, the user mentioned it's part of QEMU, and "linux-user" is likely referring to the user-mode emulation for Linux on PowerPC. So maybe this is a device-related issue because it might be about how certain devices are emulated or supported in 32-bit mode. Alternatively, it could be related to the kernel module.
+
+But I'm not entirely sure. The mention of build broken makes me think it's a compilation error when targeting 32-bit ppc for user-mode Linux. So perhaps 'mistranslation' is the closest, but if that's not applicable, then 'other' might be the safest bet.
+</think>
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file