summary refs log tree commit diff stats
path: root/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1100
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-03 07:27:52 +0000
committerChristian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com>2025-07-03 07:27:52 +0000
commitd0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a (patch)
treef8f784b0f04343b90516a338d6df81df3a85dfa2 /results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1100
parent7f4364274750eb8cb39a3e7493132fca1c01232e (diff)
downloadqemu-analysis-d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a.tar.gz
qemu-analysis-d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a.zip
add deepseek and gemma results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1100')
-rw-r--r--results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/110023
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1100 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1100
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..c9ca3a195
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1100
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report: "It riscv64 platform support user model??". The categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, I should understand the question. It's asking if RISC-V64 supports the user model in QEMU. The "user model" likely refers to user-mode execution, which is different from privileged or kernel mode. In QEMU, supporting a platform in user mode means being able to run user-space applications on that architecture without needing full OS support.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation and assembly relate more to code translation issues.
+- Device, graphic, socket, network are hardware-related but not directly about architecture support.
+- KVM is about virtualization; this isn't specifically about it.
+- Boot relates to system startup, which might be part of user model setup.
+- VNC is remote display, unrelated here.
+- Debugging tools aren't the focus.
+- Files, permissions, performance are more general and not specific to architecture support.
+- Kernel pertains to OS-level issues, but user mode is about running unprivileged code.
+- Peripherals and hypervisor don't fit directly.
+
+The question seems to be about whether QEMU supports RISC-V64 in user mode. This is likely about the architecture's ability to run guest applications without kernel privileges, which relates more to how QEMU handles user-mode emulation for that platform. Since it's about architecture support and execution model (user vs. kernel), the closest category might be 'other' because it doesn't fit into any of the specific predefined categories like KVM or network.
+</think>
+
+The bug report is asking about RISC-V64 support in user mode, which relates to QEMU's ability to emulate that architecture in user space. Since this isn't directly tied to mistranslation, assembly, or other listed categories, it falls under 'other'.
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file