add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 23 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1502 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1502
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..dadf04d0e
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/other/1502
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report for QEMU into one of the given categories. The bug is titled: "Usermode qemu-m68k futex crash while running 'cmake -E cmake_autogen'". 
+
+First, let me understand what each category means. The options are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+The bug mentions a crash in usermode qemu-m68k while running cmake commands. "Usermode" suggests it's not a kernel issue but something running in the user space. The term "futex" stands for Fast Userspace Mutex, which is related to synchronization primitives in user-space applications. So this isn't about translation issues (mistranslation), nor is it directly assembly-related unless the crash came from an assembly function.
+
+Looking at the categories, none of them seem to fit directly except maybe 'other' since futex issues might not fall into the more specific ones like kernel or hypervisor. But wait, could it be related to the kernel? Futexes are part of the Linux kernel's userspace threading support, so if QEMU is interacting with that, maybe it's a kernel issue.
+
+Alternatively, perhaps it's a bug in how QEMU handles certain operations when running user-mode code, which might fall under 'other' since it's not immediately clear. However, since futexes are part of the kernel's userspace threading, maybe 'kernel' is more appropriate.
+
+Wait, but the crash happens in usermode, so it's probably a problem with how QEMU handles userspace interactions, possibly within the kernel mode or related to system calls. But the categories list 'kernel' as a separate category, which might be the right fit here because futexes are managed by the kernel.
+
+But I'm not entirely sure if it should be classified under 'kernel' or 'other'. Since the problem is about a crash in user-mode but involves futexes which rely on kernel support, maybe 'kernel' is the better category. However, since the bug occurs during usermode execution of QEMU, perhaps 'other' is safer unless there's an explicit kernel issue.
+
+Alternatively, considering that futex operations might involve system calls handled by the hypervisor (since QEMU acts as a hypervisor for some targets), maybe it's related to the hypervisor layer. But I'm not certain about that connection.
+
+In conclusion, given that the crash is in usermode and involves futexes which are kernel-related but the bug is within QEMU itself, 'other' might be the most accurate category unless there's a specific reason to link it to another category like 'kernel'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report involves a crash during user-mode execution related to futex synchronization. Since futexes interact with the kernel's threading support and this issue arises in user-mode QEMU, the best fit is 'other' as the category.
+
+other
\ No newline at end of file