add deepseek and gemma results

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/2946 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/2946
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..44bfcc98a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/2946
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Okay, so I need to classify this bug report for QEMU. Let me read through the problem description carefully.
+
+The issue is in crypto/aes.c, which emulates AES instructions. The problem is a timing side-channel vulnerability. From what I understand, this happens because the code accesses memory arrays where the indices are based on secret data during encryption or decryption. Due to CPU caching and other factors, accessing different memory addresses can take varying amounts of time. This variability could leak secrets over a network by measuring how long crypto operations take.
+
+The user provided a link to the specific line in aes.c where this occurs and compared it to OpenSSL's approach, which uses an algorithm that doesn't depend on data for timing. It seems like the main problem is that QEMU's implementation isn't constant time, making it vulnerable to side-channel attacks.
+
+Now, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The bug is related to cryptographic operations in QEMU's TCG (Translation-Caching Guest) mode. However, the user mentioned that it was initially reported as a security issue but dismissed because TCG isn't considered secure. So, it's more about the implementation of AES rather than a direct security flaw in a traditional sense.
+
+The vulnerability is due to timing side-channels caused by non-constant time operations. This affects performance and could be seen under the 'performance' category since it relates to how efficiently or securely the crypto functions execute. Alternatively, it might fall under 'other' if none of the specific categories fit precisely.
+
+Wait, but let's think again. The issue is about the AES implementation in QEMU not being constant time, which introduces a side-channel vulnerability. Since this affects cryptographic operations, perhaps it's more aligned with performance because it's about how quickly certain operations execute, which can be monitored. Alternatively, it could also relate to 'security' but that category isn't listed here.
+
+Looking at the categories again: The options are mistranslation (incorrect semantic mapping), assembly lowering (assembly code issues), device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, other.
+
+Since it's about crypto/aes.c and the timing issue is part of the cryptographic processing, but none of the specific categories directly mention 'crypto' or 'security'. The closest might be 'performance' because it's about how the code executes over time. Or maybe 'other' since 'security' isn't listed as a category here.
+
+Wait, another angle: the bug report mentions that this is used by TCG and thus not considered a security issue. So perhaps it's more of an implementation flaw in the crypto handling, which would fall under 'performance' because it affects how quickly certain operations are performed, leading to potential side-channel leaks. Alternatively, maybe 'other' since the primary impact isn't on performance but on security, which isn't a listed category.
+
+But considering the options, 'performance' is about efficiency and execution time, so this bug does affect that aspect by introducing timing variations that could be exploited. Therefore, classifying it under 'performance' makes sense because the issue relates to how the code's execution time varies based on data, which impacts performance characteristics.
+</think>
+
+performance
\ No newline at end of file