diff options
| author | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 07:27:52 +0000 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Christian Krinitsin <mail@krinitsin.com> | 2025-07-03 07:27:52 +0000 |
| commit | d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a (patch) | |
| tree | f8f784b0f04343b90516a338d6df81df3a85dfa2 /results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/959 | |
| parent | 7f4364274750eb8cb39a3e7493132fca1c01232e (diff) | |
| download | qemu-analysis-d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a.tar.gz qemu-analysis-d0c85e36e4de67af628d54e9ab577cc3fad7796a.zip | |
add deepseek and gemma results
Diffstat (limited to 'results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/959')
| -rw-r--r-- | results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/959 | 21 |
1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/959 b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/959 new file mode 100644 index 000000000..38e6babf4 --- /dev/null +++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-2/reasoning/performance/959 @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +<think> +Okay, so I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The issue is that when running a FreeBSD guest on an M1 Mac using QEMU, the CPU utilization hits 100% even when the guest is idle. + +First, looking at the possible categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor. + +The problem is about CPU usage spiking to 100%, which indicates a performance issue. So I'm thinking the category might be 'performance'. But wait, let's consider other possibilities too. + +Could it be related to how the code is translated? Mistranslation usually affects specific instructions or functions, causing incorrect behavior. This seems more about resource usage rather than semantic errors. + +Assembly lowering could be a factor if the issue arises from how assembly code is optimized, but again, that's more about specific operations rather than overall CPU usage. + +Looking at other categories: device, graphic, network, etc., these are all related to hardware or system components. The problem here is specifically about CPU utilization, so those don't fit directly. + +Hypervisor could be relevant because QEMU acts as a hypervisor when running virtual machines. If the hypervisor isn't managing resources efficiently, that could lead to high CPU usage. But since the issue is performance-related and not directly about hypervisor functionality itself, 'performance' might still be more accurate. + +Kernel or peripherals: These are lower-level components, but again, the symptom points more towards overall performance rather than a specific kernel module or peripheral device. + +So after considering all options, 'performance' seems like the best fit because it's about how QEMU is using CPU resources under load. +</think> + +performance \ No newline at end of file |