restructure results

1 files changed, 16 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/assembly/1901359 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/assembly/1901359
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..5e08082d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/assembly/1901359
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I'm looking at this bug report and trying to figure out which category it falls into. The user mentioned an issue with the Plan9 PCI config space access routines in QEMU. Specifically, they're talking about Type 1 accesses where bit 0 of the CONFIG_ADDRESS register is being used incorrectly.
+
+The problem seems related to how addresses are translated from Type 1 to Type 0 transactions. According to thePCI specification, bits 31 and 0 should be excluded when generating configuration transactions for Type 1 translations. However, QEMU is including bit 0, causing an off-by-one error in register addresses.
+
+This sounds like an issue with how assembly code is being generated or handled during the address translation process. It's not a direct hardware problem but rather a mistake in the software's interpretation of the PCI configuration space, which affects the way addresses are calculated and used in user-mode operations.
+
+Looking at the categories provided, "assembly" seems to fit because it involves incorrect mapping from source architecture (like user-mode) to the target or IR. The issue is about how the code translates addresses, not hardware-related like device or network issues. So the category should be "assembly".
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes an issue where bit 0 of the CONFIG_ADDRESS register is incorrectly used during Type 1 access in Plan9's PCI config space routines. This misinterpretation affects address translation and leads to incorrect device behavior. The problem stems from a misunderstanding of the PCI specification, which specifies that bits 31 and 0 should be excluded. QEMU's current implementation includes bit 0, causing an off-by-one error.
+
+This issue is related to how addresses are translated during configuration transactions, specifically involving assembly-level operations. Therefore, it falls under the "assembly" category as it pertains to incorrect handling of address translation in user-mode code.
+
+**Answer:**
+assembly
\ No newline at end of file