restructure results

1 files changed, 13 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1165 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1165
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..bf6f38881
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/1165
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let's try to figure out how to classify this bug report about supporting LoongArch architecture in QEMU. First, I need to understand what each category means.
+
+The user provided several categories: mistranslation, assembly lowering, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Looking at the bug report, it mentions adding support for LoongArch architecture. Since QEMU is a hypervisor and emulator, supporting a new architecture would likely involve changes in the hypervisor layer or possibly device emulation. But LoongArch is a CPU architecture, so maybe it's more about the instruction translation or the virtualization aspect.
+
+Wait, but the categories don't have 'architecture' as an option. The closest might be 'hypervisor' since adding support for a new architecture in QEMU would involve modifying how the hypervisor handles that architecture. Alternatively, if it's related to device drivers or peripherals, maybe under 'peripherals', but I think hypervisor is more appropriate because it's about the emulation and virtualization of the CPU instruction set.
+
+I'm not entirely sure, but considering QEMU's structure, adding a new architecture support would primarily affect the hypervisor's translation layers. So, I'd say the category is 'hypervisor'.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file