restructure results

1 files changed, 27 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/897 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/897
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..9094cca8b
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/hypervisor/897
@@ -0,0 +1,27 @@
+<think>
+Alright, I need to classify this bug report: "Warning with 'qemu-s390x -cpu max'". The possible categories are mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+First, the bug mentions a warning when using 'qemu-s390x -cpu max'. QEMU is an emulator and a virtualizer. The '-cpu max' option suggests it's related to CPU configuration in the emulation.
+
+Looking at the categories:
+
+- Mistranslation: Relates to incorrect semantic mapping from source to target, possibly user-mode assembly.
+- Assembly: Lowering of assembly code.
+- Device/peripherals: Hardware device-related issues.
+- Network/socket: Connectivity or networking problems.
+- KVM: Kernel-based virtualization management.
+- Boot: Issues during the boot process.
+- Others.
+
+The warning could be related to CPU configuration. 'qemu-s390x' is the s390x architecture emulator, and '-cpu max' specifies using the maximum supported CPU features. If there's a warning here, it might not fall into assembly or mistranslation directly unless it's about feature mapping.
+
+Possible categories: device/peripherals (as CPU is a hardware component), kernel (if it's related to OS interaction with the virtual CPU), or hypervisor (since QEMU acts as a hypervisor). However, 'hypervisor' seems more specific. Alternatively, if it's a general warning not fitting other categories, 'other' might be applicable.
+
+But considering that '-cpu max' is part of the configuration and could relate to how features are exposed or managed by the hypervisor, 'hypervisor' seems like a better fit. However, sometimes warnings about CPU features might fall under 'boot' if it's during VM initialization, but I think 'hypervisor' is more precise.
+
+Wait, maybe it's about the device configuration or peripherals. Alternatively, perhaps it's related to the CPU model being set too high and causing warnings in the hypervisor layer.
+
+Alternatively, the warning could be about an unsupported feature when using '-cpu max', which might be a performance issue or a kernel interaction, but I'm not sure. Since the other categories don't seem to fit perfectly, 'other' is possible, but maybe 'hypervisor' is more appropriate.
+</think>
+
+hypervisor
\ No newline at end of file