restructure results

1 files changed, 25 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/kernel/2560 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/kernel/2560
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..d885c09d4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/kernel/2560
@@ -0,0 +1,25 @@
+<think>
+Okay, I need to classify this bug report into one of the given categories. The problem is that Go's garbage collector crashes when using qemu-x86_64 on an aarch64 host. Let me go through each possible category to see which fits best.
+
+Looking at the options: mistranslation, assembly lowering, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor, and other.
+
+The issue is happening when running a x86_64 binary on an aarch64 system using QEMU. The problem seems to be with the Go garbage collector crashing, which is a runtime issue related to how memory or processes are handled in the emulated environment.
+
+From the bug report, the crash occurs during garbage collection, specifically in lfstack.push. This suggests it's related to memory management. Since QEMU is involved, especially when using binfmt_misc to interpret x86_64 binaries on an aarch64 host, this likely pertains to how QEMU handles certain system calls or memory mappings.
+
+The user mentioned that bisecting points to commits in QEMU's linux-user code, specifically changes related to do_munmap and mmap placement. These are kernel-related functions within QEMU's user-mode emulation layer. So the issue is with how QEMU emulates these system calls on aarch64 when running x86_64 binaries.
+
+Considering that, it's not about translation or assembly lowering directly but more about how QEMU handles certain OS-level operations. It also doesn't seem to be a device, graphic, network, etc., issue. The kernel and hypervisor categories are closer because they relate to system-level emulation.
+
+But wait, the problem is within the user-mode part of QEMU, which emulates system calls for the guest OS. This would fall under the 'kernel' category since it's about how the user-space part (linux-user) handles certain operations that mimic the host kernel functions.
+
+Alternatively, since it's related to memory management and process emulation, perhaps 'other' could be a possibility if it doesn't fit into more specific categories. But given that it's tied to changes in QEMU's linux-user code, which is part of the hypervisor layer providing system calls to the guest, I think 'hypervisor' might be more accurate.
+
+Wait, but looking back, the issue arises when Go runs under QEMU and crashes due to GC issues. The problem isn't with the hypervisor itself but with how user-mode processes are handled in emulation. Therefore, it's more about the kernel part of QEMU that emulates the Linux system calls for the guest.
+
+So, 'kernel' seems appropriate as it relates to the system call handling within the user-mode emulation, which is part of the QEMU's kernel simulation for the guest OS.
+</think>
+
+The issue is related to how QEMU's user-mode emulation handles certain memory management functions when running a x86_64 binary on an aarch64 host. The problem arises from changes in the linux-user code that affect mmap and munmap operations, leading to a crash in Go's garbage collector.
+
+**Classification:** kernel
\ No newline at end of file