restructure results

1 files changed, 29 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1727259 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1727259
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..83d413eca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/manual-review/1727259
@@ -0,0 +1,29 @@
+<think>
+Alright, so I've got this bug report to classify. Let me start by reading through it carefully.
+
+The user mentioned that qemu-io-test 58 segfaults when configured with gcov. They provided steps to reproduce, including cloning the repo, configuring with --enable-gcov and a target list of ppc64-softmmu, then making and running tests. 
+
+Looking at the output, there are segmentation faults occurring during specific parts of the test. The problematic part is when running under gcov. Without gcov, the test passes.
+
+I need to categorize this bug into one of the given categories: mistranslation, assembly, other, device, graphic, socket, network, KVM, boot, vnc, debug, files, permissions, performance, kernel, peripherals, hypervisor.
+
+Segfaults often point to issues in memory management or incorrect pointer dereferencing. Since this happens when using gcov, which is a code coverage tool, the problem might be related to how functions are called or how data is accessed under profiling.
+
+Gcov usually instruments the code and may cause changes in control flow or function behavior. The test segfaults specifically during I/O operations (since it's qemu-io-test), which suggests that something is wrong when interacting with disk images, possibly due to incorrect memory handling or pointer issues introduced by gcov.
+
+Looking at the categories again: 'device' might relate if it's a hardware device emulation issue, but this seems more about software execution. 'Kernel' could be relevant if it's a problem in the hypervisor kernel, but I'm not sure. 'Other' is a catch-all category for issues that don't fit elsewhere.
+
+Since the bug is triggered by gcov and affects an I/O test, it might be related to how the code is instrumented or optimized when coverage is enabled. This could point towards issues in function calls, memory access, or perhaps even assembly optimizations, but without specific details on where in the code this happens, it's hard to pinpoint.
+
+Given that it's a segfault during I/O operations under profiling, and considering the categories provided, 'other' seems like the safest bet because it doesn't fit neatly into any of the more specific categories like device or network. It could be an edge case related to how gcov interacts with the code, possibly leading to undefined behavior or incorrect memory access that's not present without the profiling.
+
+I should also consider whether it's a performance issue, but the problem is a crash rather than just slow performance, so 'performance' might not fit. Similarly, debug isn't about runtime issues but rather debugging tools.
+
+So, after considering all these points, I think the bug is best categorized under 'other'.
+</think>
+
+The bug report describes a segfault occurring in qemu-io-test 58 when using gcov for profiling. Since the issue doesn't specifically relate to any of the more targeted categories like device or network and seems related to code instrumentation by gcov, it's best classified as:
+
+**Other**
+
+This category captures issues that don't neatly fit into other specific areas, particularly those involving unexpected behavior under profiling tools.
\ No newline at end of file