restructure results

1 files changed, 21 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1787002 b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1787002
new file mode 100644
index 000000000..fc0fed4fc
--- /dev/null
+++ b/results/classifier/deepseek-r1:14b/reasoning/mistranslation/1787002
@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
+<think>
+Alright, let me try to figure this out. So the user is having a bug when compiling QEMU, specifically in the disas/i386.c file. The error message mentions an assembler issue with 'L0
' not resolving between the *ABS* and .bss sections. That sounds like it's related to how the linker or the compiler is handling the sections.
+
+Looking at the problematic line: strcpy (obuf + strlen (obuf) - 6, alt);. The user mentioned that if they comment this out, compilation works fine. So this line must be causing some sort of issue during assembly.
+
+The error occurs only on 32-bit systems but not on 64-bit. I'm thinking about why that might be the case. Maybe it's related to how pointers or memory addresses are handled differently in 32-bit vs 64-bit environments. 
+
+Looking at the possible categories, mistranslation is about incorrect mapping from source to target architecture, which seems relevant here since it's a compilation issue. The error is during assembly, so it might be an issue with how the code is being translated or lowered into assembly.
+
+The function is INVLPG_Fixup in disas/i386.c. Thestrcpy line is trying to manipulate the obuf variable. If obuf isn't correctly addressed, especially on 32-bit where memory management can be more tight, it might cause section mismatches. This could relate to how pointers are handled or perhaps buffer overflows.
+
+Another possibility is that in 32-bit mode, the way strings are handled or addresses are computed could lead to incorrect sections being referenced. The error mentions 'L0
' not resolving between *ABS* and .bss, so maybe obuf isn't properly aligned or is pointing to an invalid section.
+
+Since it's a compile-time error in the assembler step, it's more about how the code is generated rather than runtime issues. This makes me think it's related to the translation process—how the C code is being converted into assembly. So mistranslation seems appropriate because it's a mapping issue from source (C) to IR or target (assembly).
+
+I don't think it fits into other categories like device, graphic, or network since those are more runtime issues with specific hardware interactions. It's not related to KVM, VNC, or debug either because the error is during compilation, not runtime.
+
+Therefore, mistranslation seems to be the correct category here because it's about the incorrect mapping from source code (C) to assembly, specifically on 32-bit systems.
+</think>
+
+mistranslation
\ No newline at end of file